Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
Part IV - Applications / case studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reframing Visual Social ScienceTowards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology, pp. 191 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
7 References
Boerdam, J. and Martinius, W. Oosterbaan (1978) ‘Het Fotogenieke van het Samenleven (part 1 and 2).’ Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 5(1), June: 3–36, and (5) 2, October: 301–25.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (ed.) (1978) Un art moyen: essai sur les usages sociaux de la photographie, 2nd edn. Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit (first edition 1965).Google Scholar
Cheung, C. (2000) ‘A Home on the Web: Presentations of Self on Personal Homepages.’ In: Gauntlett, D. (ed.) Web.Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London: Arnold, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
De Haas, W. (1975) De Fotografie in Sociologisch Perspectief, bijdrage tot een sociologie der techniek, PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Freund, G. (1980) Photography & Society. London: Gordon Fraser. (Original: Photographie et Société, 1974, France.)Google Scholar
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. and Zhao, Y. (2003) ‘Writing photo captions for the Web.’ First Monday 8(9). Available from: www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_9/garner/index.html [accessed May 14, 2007].Google Scholar
Lee, R. M. (2000) Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. (1992) The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Musello, C. (1979) ‘Family Photography.’ In: Wagner, J. (ed.) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage, pp. 101–18.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1979) De Fotografie Sociologisch Belicht: 1. De geschiedenis van de fotografie als een samenspel van sociale en technologische ontwikkelingen en 2. Aanzetten tot een sociologie van het foto-amateurisme (unpublished Master’s thesis), University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1994) ‘De Betekenis van het Banale, familiefotografie als sociale praktijk en sociologische databron.’ Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 15(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002a) ‘Communicating Desired Pasts: On the Digital Construction of Private Histories: What Is Really at Stake?’ Journal of Visual Literacy 22, Autumn: 166–44.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002b) ‘Families on the Web.’ In: Newman, D. Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge, pp. 231–35.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2005a) ‘Websites as Visual and Multimodal Cultural Expressions: Opportunities and Issues of Online Hybrid Media Research,’ Media, Culture & Society 27(4): 604–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2005b) ‘De Private Fotografie als Sociaal-cultureel Fenomeen en Wetenschappelijke Databron: van familiealbum tot webstek.’ In: Pauwels, L. and Peters, J.-M. Denken over Beelden: Theorie en Analyse van het Beeld en de Beeldcultuur. Leuven/Voorburg: Acco, pp. 105–61.Google Scholar
Reis, G. (2004) Digital image integrity. Available from: www.adobe.com/digitalimag/pdfs/digital_image_integrity.pdf [accessed May 14, 2007]Google Scholar
Wakeford, N. (2000) ‘New Methodologies: Studying the Web.’ In: Gauntlett, D. (ed.) Web Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London: Arnold, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Weare, C., and Lin, W. Y. (2000) ‘Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges.’ Social Science Computer Review 18(3): 272–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 References
Forty, A. (1986) Objects of Desire: Design & Society from Wedgwood to IBM. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1996) De Verbeelde Samenleving: Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Pepper, G. (1994) Communicating in Organizations: A Cultural Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York/London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
References
Albrecht, H., Bergman, H., Diederich, G., Grober, E., Hofman, V. and Keller, P. (1990) Agricultural Extension, Vol. 2: Examples and Background Materials. Eschborn: BMZ/GTZ.Google Scholar
Brouwer, H. (1995) ‘Communicating with Pictures: The Role of Pictures in Health Education in Outpatient Clinics of Rural African Hospitals.’ Visual Sociology 10(1–2): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lange, R. (2000) ‘The Effect of Culture on the Efficacy of Pictures in Developing Communities: A Review of Certain Research and Some Guiding Principles.’ Journal of Visual Literacy 20(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epskamp, K. (1992) Cross-Cultural Interpretations of Cartoons and Drawings. The Empowerment of Culture: Development Communication and Popular Media. CESO paperback No. 17. The Hague: Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries (CESO).Google Scholar
Fuglesang, A. (1982), About Understanding: Ideas and Observations on Cross-Cultural Communication. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar
Markova, I. and Power, K. (1992) ‘Audience Response to Health Messages about Aids.’ In: Edgar, T., Fitzpatrick, M. A. and Freimuth, V. S. (eds.) AIDS: A Communication Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 111–30.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. (1995) ‘The Gatekeeping Process: The Right Combinations to Unlock the Gates.’ In: Maibach, E. and Parrott, R. L. (eds.) Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 199–217,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1993) ‘The Visual Essay: Affinities and Divergences between the Social Scientific and the Social Documentary Modes.’ Visual Anthropology 6: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, K., Cameron, K. A., Lapinski, M. K. and Nzyuko, S. (1998) ‘A Theoretically Based Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Prevention Campaigns along the Trans-Africa Highway in Kenya.’ Journal of Health Communication 3: 345–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, A. and Zimmer, F. (1978) Visual Literacy in Communication: Designing for Development. Teheran/London: International Institute for Adult Literacy Methods/Hulton Educational Publishers.Google Scholar