Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- 12 Ethics of visual research in the offline and online world
- 13 A meta-disciplinary framework for producing and assessing visual representations
- 14 Advancing visual research: pending issues and future directions
- Index
- References
13 - A meta-disciplinary framework for producing and assessing visual representations
from Part V - Visual research in a wider perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- 12 Ethics of visual research in the offline and online world
- 13 A meta-disciplinary framework for producing and assessing visual representations
- 14 Advancing visual research: pending issues and future directions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reframing Visual Social ScienceTowards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology, pp. 280 - 308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
7 References
Cambrosio, A., Jacobi, D. and Keating, P. (1993) ‘Ehrlich’s “Beautiful Pictures” and the Controversial Beginnings of Immunological Imagery.’ ISIS 84: 662–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Gombrich, E. H. (1994) Art & Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon (first published 1960).Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1996) ‘Transparent Vision.’ In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, D. N. and Pea, R. D. (1995) ‘Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology.’ The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4: 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (2006) ‘Edward Tufte and the Promise of a Visual Social Science.’ In: Pauwels, Luc (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, Hanover, NH/London: Dartmouth College Press / University Press of New England, pp. 222–65.Google Scholar
Knor-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1998) ‘Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text.’ In: Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. (eds.) Reading Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985a) ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.’ Social Studies of Science 15: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985b) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (eds.) (1998) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Pasveer, B. (1992) Shadows of Knowledge: Making a Representing Practice in Medicine: X-Ray Pictures and Pulmonary Tuberculosis, 1895–1930. University of Amsterdam: dissertation.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2000) ‘Taking the Visual Turn in Research and Scholarly Communication: Key Issues in Developing a More Visually Literate (Social) Science.’ Visual Sociology 15: 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002) ‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’ Visual Studies 17(2): 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. D. (1994) ‘Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications.’ Journal of the Learning Sciences 3: 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, B. (1978) Photographers at Work: A Sociology of Photographic Styles, York/London: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and Bowen, G. M. (1999) ‘Digitizing Lizards: The Topology of “Vision” in Ecological Fieldwork.’ Social Studies of Science 29: 719–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and Bowen, G. M. (2001) ‘“Creative Solutions” and “Fibbing Results”: Enculturation in Field Ecology.’ Social Studies of Science 31: 533–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and McGinn, M. K. (1997) ‘Graphing: Cognitive Ability or Practice.’ Science Education 81: 91–106.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W-M., Bowen, G. M. and McGinn, M. K. (1999) ‘Differences in Graph-Related Practices between High School Biology Textbooks and Scientific Ecology Journals.’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 977–1019.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W-M., Bowen, G. M. and Masciotra, D. (2002) ‘From Thing to Sign and “Natural Object”: Toward a Genetic Phenomenology of Graph Interpretation.’ Science, Technology & Human Values 27: 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijder, J. (1989) ‘Benjamin on the Reproducibility and Aura: A Reading of “The Work of Art in the Age of its Technical Reproducibility.”’ In: Smith, G. (ed.) Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History. University of Chicago Press, pp. 158–74.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.Google Scholar