Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- 1 Prologue and outline: (re)framing visual social science?
- 2 An integrated framework for conducting and assessing visual social research
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
1 - Prologue and outline: (re)framing visual social science?
from Part I - Remodeling visual social science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- 1 Prologue and outline: (re)framing visual social science?
- 2 An integrated framework for conducting and assessing visual social research
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reframing Visual Social ScienceTowards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology, pp. 3 - 15Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
4 References
Ball, M. and Smith, G. (1992) Analyzing Visual Data. Newbury Park, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M. (2007) Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1986) Doing Things Together: Selected Papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York/London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Revised and expanded edition with Collier, M. (1986), Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Curry, T. and Clarke, A. (1983) [1977] Introducing Visual Sociology. 2nd edn. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
De Heusch, L. (1988) ‘The Cinema and Social Science: A Survey of Ethnographic and Sociological Films.’ Visual Anthropology 1: 99–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmison, M. and Smith, P. (2000) Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A. and Ravetz, A. (eds.) (2004) Visualizing Anthropology: Experimenting with Image-Based Ethnography. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Heider, K. (2006) [1976] Ethnographic Film, revised edn. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Henny, L. (1986) ‘Theory and Practice of Visual Sociology.’ Current Sociology 34(3): 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, P. (ed.) (2003) [1975] Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd ed. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
MacDougall, D. and Taylor, L. (eds.) (1998) Transcultural Cinema. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (2011) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. (1963) ‘Anthropology and the Camera.’ In: Morgan, W. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Photography, New York: Greystone Press, pp. 166–84.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1975) ‘Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) (2003) Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd edn. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. and Bateson, G. (1985) [1942] Balinese Character: A Photographic Analysis. New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. (2011) Doing Visual Research. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1996) De Verbeelde Samenleving: Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002) ‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’ Visual Studies 17: 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2010) ‘Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.’ Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4): 545–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S. (2001) Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Prosser, J. (ed.) (2000) Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In: Hockings, P. (2003) [1975] (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd edn. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (1986) ‘The Future of Anthropological Cinema: A Modest Polemic.’ Visual Sociology Review 1: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. (2011) Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Visions, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stanczak, G. (ed.) (2007) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.Google Scholar