To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the previous chapter we looked at the role of rumours in dislodging the image of the colonial state and the activities of various revolutionary parties in attempting to politicise the countryside in preparation for a revolutionary struggle. Let us now pan out of Bengal in this chapter to analyse the responses of the Government of India (GOI), as well as Gandhi, to the movement. In the following pages, I undertake an analysis of the different ideas and meanings of ‘responsibility’ for the movement, passed around between the GOI and Gandhi. Both tried to completely deny any sort of responsibility for the movement or the violence that ensued, but for different reasons. This then will give us an insight into the desperate situation that Britain found itself in the global context of the War as well as Gandhi's position at this critical juncture of anti-colonial politics. But before that, and since in the previous chapter we have studied the preparations made by the revolutionary parties, let us first take a look at how prepared exactly the GOI was in meeting any threat of civil disobedience from Gandhi and the Congress. This will also reveal subtle tensions between routes envisaged by the GOI and the British government, an aspect that continued to find echoes even in the post-war political scenario (see Conclusion).
This chapter focuses on the co-production of commercial social credit ratings by citizens and e-payment platforms, and on the financial transaction and financial network data provided by citizens when participating in Alibaba and Tencent’s commercial credit-rating systems. It starts by laying out the regional variation in voluntary subscription to commercial credit ratings. It finds that, surprisingly, less developed provinces are taking the lead in this development. The chapter then investigates who engages in data production, focusing on the role of privacy concerns and motivation. Despite strong evidence for privacy concerns, these play a minor role in decisions about joining commercial social credit-rating systems. Instead, citizens predominantly join for financial motivations. Financial rewards help overcome privacy concerns, thus drawing citizens into volunteering their data for the construction of the SCS. Data production is therefore skewed toward those who see SCS as a financial rather than political tool. These users volunteer financial transaction and network data to the firm, which can be leveraged by Alibaba and Tencent as informational and organizational resources in the state–company relationship around developing the SCS.
Film theorists rewrote the history of cinema by claiming that standard Hollywood products, long regarded as patently unreal, escapist entertainment, were realist. The chapter shows how and why they were wrong, and it argues that there are significant inherent limitations that the medium of the commercial fiction film places on any attempt at realism, especially the standard theatrical running time. In order to do this, I focus on the films of Howard Hawks, whose films have been said to best illustrate what Robert Ray calls Hollywood’s invisible style. Hawks was used to illustrate classic Hollywood’s supposed illusionistic realism, which it was claimed allowed movies to disseminate all manner of ideological mischief. But one only need to pay attention to the films themselves to see that they don’t claim to be realist. Indeed, Hawks’s films often seem to be hermetically sealed off from ordinary life, ignoring the details of social relations in which realist narratives are grounded. In this he entirely typical of Hollywood film then and now. Finally, I look at Italian neorealism, the films of John Sayles, and other films that are more properly understood as realist.
The Harvard sociologist Talcott Parsons is one of the prime intellectual actors of World War II producing applied studies of Nazi Germany and providing training to members of the military government entering the occupied areas in Germany. Chapter 6 revisits his collaboration with Carl J. Friedrich, especially on a pamphlet on Nazi Poison, his momentous meeting with social philosopher Alfred Schutz and political theorist Eric Voegelin. I argue that the insights that he gained into the supposed “anomie,” that is, the chaotic nature of Nazi Germany starting in 1938 and throughout World War II, significantly shaped – by means of inversion and contrast – his positive design of a functioning social system in his post-war study The Social System, at first for the United States, but then also globally, as a scheme for the organization of modern society as such.
Russian imperial nationalists demand Ukrainians accept they are a Little Russian branch of the pan-Russian nation and will never accept a Ukraine independent of Russia with a right to decide its own memory politics, language, foreign and security policies. Since 1991, Russia has found it very difficult to accept an independent Ukraine. The Soviet Union included a Ukrainian republic and recognised Ukrainians as a separate people, although forever bonded with Russians. Putin reverted to the Tsarist imperial denial of the existence of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Russia’s first invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea in 2014 made imperialism and nationalism the driving forces of Russian foreign policy. During the decade between Russia’s two invasions of Ukraine, from 2014 to 2021, Russian imperial nationalism became a dominant force in Putin’s Russia, providing ideological justification for the Kremlin’s plan to destroy the Ukrainian state and Ukrainian identity.
Through investigating how exactly bribery take place, this chapter examines why guanxi is a necessary conduit of corruption in China. I argue that guanxi-practice embodies an alternative contracting mechanism of corruption with three functions. First, it allows corruption practitioners to communicate their intent to exchange without explicitly expressing it. Second, it minimizes the otherwise prohibitively high transactional costs and reduces the moral and cognitive barriers of corruption. Third, it contains a self-enforcing mechanism that allows the terms of corruption to be negotiated and enforced. Performed with tactics and etiquettes, guanxi-practice seamlessly grafts a corrupt and immoral agreement upon a social setting, in which venality is neutralized and rationalized. In this redefined social reality of corruption, an instrumental relationship is perceived or at least presentable as a reciprocal relationship based on social commitment. Lastly, I draw attention to the emergence of professional guanxi-brokers that has marketized guanxi and extended the otherwise highly restricted opportunity to engage in parochial corruption to a much-broadened user base.
The Wire is an example of the way that new technologies and methods of dissemination have made realism possible on television. Where broadcast TV required episodes that could be watched independently and that were structured by the need for commercial interruptions, pay networks such as HBO and the more recent streaming services allow for long-form narratives that develop over many weeks and stretch on for years. The Wire has been widely recognized for its realism, which, however, is usually equated with what is seen as the program’s accuracy. I show how it makes use of conventions of realism inherited from nineteenth century fiction, which are enabled by its structure as a long-form program. The Wire makes use of genres not typically associated with realism, including crime fiction (the police procedural), TV’s police melodramas, and the ancient genre of tragedy as a plot form in Hayden White’s sense. The series incorporates this variety of genres in the service of a vision of ordinary life that continually surprises the viewers. The Wire thus demonstrates the power of new forms of television to represent social complexity to a degree not found in media other than print.
This chapter begins Part II of the book – on the SCS as participatory space. It explores the relationship between government and companies in developing commercial social credit ratings targeting citizens. It starts by explaining the overall structure of the SCS, followed by background information on the two most important company players – Alibaba and Tencent. Drawing on procurement notices and process tracing of the evolution of SCS over time based on expert interviews, Chinese academic publications, news articles, and policy documents, it outlines the nature of the state–company partnership and the dynamic changes in the partnership over time. It argues and demonstrates that the user base and architecture built by companies preceding the 2014 plan for the SCS created a certain degree of dependency on platforms for the state. This in-depth analysis of the role of companies during the evolution of social credit rating of individual citizens highlights that commercial credit rating was not established under a command-and-control system where the state dominates the design of the system and corporate players merely follow the state’s vision, instructions, and directives. Instead, Alibaba and Tencent significantly influenced the design and implementation of the central government’s vision.
Moving the focus back from the global to the regional, let us now take a look at the nature of the movement as it developed in Bengal between 1942 and 1944. Almost a century after the Revolt of 1857, the Quit India Movement emerged as one of the biggest moments of a direct confrontation between the colonial state and the masses. Just like in other parts of the country, in Bengal too, the movement first started in the urban areas, but as the violence and disturbances in these areas started subsiding, it sprang up with renewed vigour in the countryside. This chapter is divided into two main sections. The first section looks at the main centres of the movement in the urban areas in parts of north Bengal, Birbhum, Howrah and Calcutta. Midnapore, which was the main storm centre in the countryside, has been discussed in a separate section, as the formation of the Tamralipta Jatiya Sarkar deserves a separate analysis. More or less, the movement followed a similar pattern throughout the province.
In north Bengal, students played a key role in popularising and leading the movement. Here, student politics was heavily influenced by revolutionary groups, especially the resurgent Anushilan Party and Jugantar, whose main areas of influence were Dinajpur, Pabna, Rajshahi, Japlpaiguri and Rangpur. In Pabna, Siliguri and Rajshahi, a large number of students left schools and colleges and led hartals, processions and distribution of anti-British pamphlets.
Why did the movement come to an end? Despite arguments of Gandhian legitimacies, the seemingly ‘sudden’ end of a ‘popular’ movement that survived for two years is baffling, to say the least. Upon his release from prison in May 1944, Gandhi unilaterally gave a call for surrender for all those who were ‘underground’, distancing himself and the Congress High Command from the violent ‘underground’ revolutionaries. But while most of the remaining underground revolutionaries, including those of Midnapore, surrendered, those of the Satara Prati Sarkar did not; rather, some revolutionaries of the Prati Sarkar argued that the question of surrender did not even arise.1 In Satara, police repression made little difference to the movement; Gandhi's original call of ‘Do or Die’ took precedence over his current demands of surrender, and the activities of the Prati Sarkar – local nyayadan mandal (justice board or law board) work, punishment of criminals, sporadic bank and post office robberies – intensified from mid-1944.2 Given the intense struggle that the revolutionaries of Tamralipta Jatiya Sarkar had waged for nearly two years, why did they not follow the Satara example, then? Attempts to answer this question must, at least in part, find context in the famine of 1943, which impacted Bengal in unprecedented ways, in terms of not only hunger but also communal politics around famine relief and rehabilitation.3
The famine of 1943 impacted Midnapore as severely as it did the rest of Bengal. Famine conditions appeared in Midnapore earlier than they did in other parts of the province, and deaths by starvation started to occur as early as June 1943.
El comercio transpacífico entre América Latina y Asia Oriental durante el período previo a la Segunda Guerra Mundial ha sido escasamente estudiado. En este artículo, analizamos la construcción desde Argentina del vínculo mercantil con Japón entre 1934 y 1940. Al hacerlo, ponderamos las oportunidades y las limitaciones que surgieron en un contexto de des-globalización económica, y arrojamos luz sobre las posibilidades de diversificación geográfica del comercio exterior argentino. Abordando diversas fuentes de los sectores público y privado, el estudio revela que las iniciativas gubernamentales por profundizar los lazos con el socio oriental, apoyadas por los agroexportadores, enfrentó críticas de los empresarios textiles, quienes acusaron a Japón de ejercer dumping financiero y social.