To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
While bioelectronic devices hold great promise in revolutionizing medicine and healthcare, they also face numerous challenges that must be overcome (you can add some references from above here). This includes improving the longevity and safety of these devices, ensuring their ethical use, and ensuring their compatibility with the human body and the environment.
There are several concerns with the use of bioelectronic sensors for healthcare applications, including:
1. Implantation: Bioelectronic sensors that are implanted into the body can cause discomfort, infection, and scarring, and they can also trigger an immune response that can affect their performance over time. This degradation of the sensor can be toxic to the body.
2. Power supply: Bioelectronic sensors often require a power source to operate, which can be a challenge for devices especially those that are implanted inside the body. If at all, bioelectronic sensors must draw power, then it must be at a minimum possible.
3. Data security: Bioelectronic sensors can generate sensitive medical information, which must be protected from unauthorized access, hacking, or data breaches.
4. Performance: Bioelectronic sensors must be highly accurate and reliable, as even small errors in readings can have significant consequences for patient health.
5. Interoperability: Bioelectronic sensors must be able to work seamlessly with other medical devices and software, to enable the exchange and analysis of data.
6. Cost: Bioelectronic sensors can be expensive, both to manufacture and to maintain, which can limit their accessibility and affordability for patients.
7. Regulatory approval: Bioelectronic sensors must be approved by regulatory agencies such as the FDA, which can be a lengthy and complex process that requires extensive testing and data analysis.
8. Designing good bioelectronic sensors remains a challenge due to unavailability of necessary circuit simulation tools. Software currently available may be good for normal electronic circuits, but design of any bioelectronic circuit is different and challenging. Proposed solutions must show that value addition.
There are a number of concerns with the use of bioelectronic sensors for environmental monitoring:
1. Durability: Bioelectronic sensors can be vulnerable to physical damage and degradation from exposure to harsh environmental conditions.
2. Interference: Bioelectronic sensors can be susceptible to interference from other electrical signals or devices, leading to inaccurate readings.
3. Power supply: Bioelectronic sensors often require a power source to operate, which can be a challenge in remote or inaccessible locations.
4. Sensitivity: Bioelectronic sensors can be sensitive to a wide range of environmental variables, making it difficult to isolate the specific signals of interest.
5. Data processing: Bioelectronic sensors generate substantial amounts of data, which can be challenging to process, analyse, and interpret.
6. Cost: Bioelectronic sensors can be expensive to manufacture, maintain, and replace, which can limit their widespread deployment.
7. Biofouling: Bioelectronic sensors can be susceptible to fouling or build-up of biological material on their surfaces, reducing their performance over time.
Bioelectronics have been gaining popularity in recent years due to their potential use in the field of neurorehabilitation. The aim is to use these technologies to help individuals recover from various neurological conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury. The basic principle behind bioelectronics is to use electrical/optical stimulation to activate neurons in the brain and promote functional recovery. One example of bioelectronics use in neurorehabilitation is through the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). BCIs are computer systems that use electrodes to detect and interpret electrical signals generated by the brain. These signals can then be used to control external devices such as robotic limbs, exoskeletons, and computer interfaces. The hope is that BCIs will help individuals with paralysis or other conditions regain movement and control over their limbs.
The Defining Issues Test (DIT) has been widely used in psychological experiments to assess one’s developmental level of moral reasoning in terms of postconventional reasoning. However, there have been concerns regarding whether the tool is biased across people with different genders and political and religious views. To address the limitations, in the present study, I tested the validity of the brief version of the test, that is, the behavioral DIT, in terms of the measurement invariance and differential item functioning (DIF). I could not find any significant non-invariance at the test level or any item demonstrating practically significant DIF at the item level. The findings indicate that neither the test nor any of its items showed a significant bias toward any particular group. As a result, the collected validity evidence supports the use of test scores across different groups, enabling researchers who intend to examine participants’ moral reasoning development across heterogeneous groups to draw conclusions based on the scores.
Seven varieties of forage oats from China were evaluated in the temperate environment of Bhutan for morphological traits, dry matter production, and forage quality. The oat variety Qingyin No. 1 provided a greater plant height (61 cm) and the largest number of tillers per plant (five tillers per plant). The leaf-stem ratio (LSR) was highest for Longyan No. 2 (LSR 0.73). During harvest in late winter, Longyan No. 2 had a greater plant height (64 cm) and the highest number of tillers per plant (seven tillers per plant), followed by Qingyin No. 1. The top three varieties with high LSRs of 1.49, 1.31, and 1.35 were Longyan No. 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In both summer and winter, Longyan No. 2 had the highest forage yields of around 5.00 and 4.00 DM t/ha, respectively. Qingyin No. 1 was the second largest forage producer, with under 5.00 DM t/ha in summer and under 3.00 DM t/ha in winter. For forage quality, Longyan No. 2 and Longyan No. 3 had the highest levels of crude protein (15%) in summer. However, during late winter, the Linna variety had the highest crude protein content (13%). The overall results of the field experiments suggest that Longyan No. 2 and Qingyin No. 1 are promising new oat varieties for winter fodder production in the temperate environments of Bhutan.
Under the influence of γ-quanta (60Co, P = 9.276 rad/s, T = 300 K), the amount, formation rate, and radiation-chemical yield of molecular hydrogen obtained from the radiolysis process that changes the mass of water (m = 0.0001 ÷ 0.8 g) have been defined in the created nano-SiO2/H2O system with m = 0.2 g mass and d = 20 nm particle size. It was determined that the radiation-chemical yield of molecular hydrogen obtained from the water radiolysis process in the nano-SiO2/H2O system created by the adsorption of water on the nanoparticle surface had a low value. In systems created with the addition of water, the radiation-chemical yield of molecular hydrogen obtained from its radiolysis increased in direct proportion to the water mass. This proves that due to ionizing rays, the yield of electrons emitted from the nanoparticle surface into the water and solvated there increases. Therefore, the radiation-chemical yield of molecular hydrogen is higher than that of the adsorbed system.
The general premise of this chapter is to address thermodynamic behaviors and structure of charged macromolecules in non-dilute conditions, such as semidilute and concentrated solutions. After a summary of uncharged macromolecules in concentrated solutions, the coupling between the electrostatic and topological correlations is treated. Five regimes of polymer concentrations are outlined accompanied by a collection of experimental data. Spontaneous formation of large aggregates formed by similarly charged macromolecules is described in detail.
The scope of the book is outlined with specific examples of phenomenology that are outlined and explained in subsequent chapters. The necessity of bridging electrostatic and topological correlations to understand the behavior of charged macromolecules is addressed.
This chapter introduces important concepts such as Gouy-Chapman length, double-layer, Manning condensation, and regularization of the charge of a geometrical object in electrolyte solutions. A clear description of counterion distribution around charged objects is presented.
This chapter summarizes the various models to treat isolated uncharged flexible chains and outlines the properties of the chains with a comparison with experimental results. The summary presented in this chapter is the first step to enter into the field of charged macromolecules.