To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article examines Irish nationalist girl scouts in the period 1911‒23 with a particular focus on the organisation Clan na Gael (or Clann na nGaedheal). It illuminates the involvement of girls in Irish nationalist youth organisations in the early twentieth century and situates them in the wider contexts of uniformed youth groups and the Irish nationalist movement during this period. Like their male counterparts in Na Fianna Éireann, Irish nationalist girl scouts received forms of military training and provided military support services to their adult colleagues in the Irish independence movement. Thus, these Irish girls challenged the gender conventions of the time more overtly than members of the international Girl Guide movement. Participation in these groups could also serve as a conduit to future membership and activism in Cumann na mBan or the Irish Citizen Army. The contributions of Clan na Gael and other girl scouts to the Irish nationalist movement demonstrate that girls, as well as boys, sought to further the struggle for Irish independence. Yet, these adolescent female activists have received far less recognition for their efforts. This may be due to their relatively small numbers, dismissive preconceptions of their contribution, and the sparsity of primary source material.
That on 22 January 2007 at 12h00 at 96A PERCHERSON STREET, BEAULIEU, KYALAMI being the defendant's residential address, payment of the judgement debt in the amount of R325,000.00, my costs plus VAT was demanded from WILLIAMSON CRAIG MICHAEL … declared that he has no money, moveable or disposable property wherewith to satisfy the said warrant …
It is further certified that WILLIAMSON CRAIG MICHAEL was requested to declare whether he owns any immovable property which is executable, on which the following reply was furnished, ‘No.’
— J van den Heever, ‘Return: Execution of Writ of Execution’ to the High Court, Johannesburg
The attempts to bring Craig Williamson to justice for the murders of Jeanette and Katryn Schoon took many forms, spanning more than a decade. Even though Williamson confessed to his role in the murder and despite the tenacious persistence of the Schoon family to do everything in their power to stop Williamson from evading justice, their efforts ended with the limp, pathetic lie that Williamson gave to Deputy Sheriff Van den Heever.
To make sense of this remarkable travesty of justice, an entirely separate book could be written. There is neither time nor space to analyse all the twists and turns in Craig Williamson's path to amnesty and beyond. However, it is necessary briefly to sketch the broad contours of this process, towards an assessment of the specific significance of this book to contemporary contestations around justice for the crimes of apartheid. In addition, tracing Williamson's successful evasion of justice offers important signposts for further research, which could build on this book and take it in new directions.
Evading justice
Crucially, it was Marius Schoon who first sought justice for the murder of his wife and daughter by filing a civil suit against Craig Williamson, on 18 August 1995. Marius Schoon's case against Williamson came about in response to a televised confession by Williamson, who showed no shame for his role in the 1984 bombing of the Schoons’ home in Angola. Citing over a decade of trauma endured by himself and young Fritz, Marius Schoon sued for R1 million, with roughly a quarter designated in Williamson's ‘personal capacity’ and the rest in his ‘representative capacity’ as a servant of the police.
Famars (ancient Fanum Martis) is situated in northern Gaul, in the south of the Nervian territory. Large-scale investigations undertaken over the last ten years have enabled in-depth analyses of archaeobotanical, archaeozoological and ceramic data, alongside other artefacts. These analyses have demonstrated the town's management of raw materials yielded by its territory, as well as the processing and redistribution of the finished products on a local and regional scale, and across the whole of northern Gaul. Such settlements were part of the Empire's system for supplying troops and inhabitants with food and materials of all kinds. Although data from perishable or otherwise ephemeral materials are limited, ceramics can act as proxy evidence of the production and distribution of other products. This paper provides an overview of these recent discoveries and places them in the broader context of Roman-period supply networks.
Racism, in its first and last instance … is about controlling white people: reinforcing an amoral self-abnegation and attenuating moral accountability in order to exact compliance with the administrative, ideological, and material annihilation of black and non-black people.
— Tiffany Willoughby-Herard, Waste of a White Skin
This book focuses on a small group of white radicals, centred on the experiences of Jeanette (Jenny) Curtis and Marius Schoon, between 1972 and 1984. In large part, the individuals who are at the core of this book are largely absent from the existing historiography of the anti-apartheid struggle. Jenny's story has been told, in part, via a memoir by her father, Jack Curtis, and Jonathan Ancer's 2017 biography of Craig Williamson. Interviews with Marius Schoon were included in The Rift, Hilda Bernstein's collection on the exile experience, as well as Julie Frederikse's book on nonracialism, The Unbreakable Thread, published in 1990. Beyond this, there is little to speak of. Unlike their better-known contemporaries, Joe Slovo and Ruth First, no full biographies have been published for either of the Schoons and neither are they generally spoken of in books that cover the armed struggle or the ANC. Part of the reason for this absence, I argue, is because the Schoons’ story is – in important respects – ‘unusable’ in the sense that neither their participation in the anti-apartheid struggle nor the multiple moments of tragedy in their lives fits neatly within a triumphant narrative. However, it is precisely the fact that this history is not easily contained within the standard narratives of the liberation struggle that it deserves to be researched and analysed.
This book is not a biography of either Jeanette or Marius Schoon. To the extent that what is contained here is of a biographical nature, I’ve taken inspiration from a growing trend among historians to write ‘biographies of a generation’. Luisa Passerini's Autobiography of a Generation, for example, analyses the radical upheaval in Italy in 1968, while Robert Foster's Vivid Faces depicts the Irish generation that fought for independence around the turn of the twentieth century.