To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Robert Tibbo is known for his work in the areas of administrative and constitutional law focused on human rights and asylum and refugee law. Mr Tibbo has acted for clients in high-profile extradition and deportation cases. Such cases include the NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, the refugees who sheltered Snowden in Hong Kong, and Xiao Hui in Australia's largest case of insider trading. He was a barrister-at-law at the Hong Kong bar from 2005 to June 2023. He was granted special authorisation to practise law by the Quebec Bar from 2022 to 2023. He is currently a barrister and solicitor and has been a member of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society since June 2023.
Introduction
People generally take their freedom of speech for granted. When they feel safe and secure, they will readily speak up and support a popular cause or person, often regardless of whether the cause is just or the person morally deserving. There, the stakes are low and the risks few in exercising this fundamental right. But when it comes to a just-but-unpopular cause, such as those often taken up by whistleblowers, very few have the courage and moral fortitude to step up and speak out. Those who do so put themselves at real, personal, and immediate risk since governments, empowered by a largely indifferent or fearful public, have the ability to arbitrarily use their powers, directly and indirectly, to silence them.
In this chapter I will try to offer some reflexive analysis of my whistleblowing experience as related in Chapter 5. Time is a great healer, and I have found that, while I have remained utterly committed to ensuring that the case was brought to a successful conclusion, much of the psychic pain has softened, and I am much more sanguine about the eventual outcome. Immersion in the academic process has also had a profound effect. A disciplined studious approach, based on objectivity in research, and the exploration of a range of experiences and views with many previously undisclosed facts, has led to a much better understanding of what really happened. The successful conclusion of the separate, but related, trials of Airbus Group, GPT, and the executive individuals intimately involved in the corruption has also led to a sense of vindication and satisfaction at my whistleblowing having procured an effective result. But it has not been an easy journey over the past 12 years as the following paragraphs will describe.
Whistleblowers UK
In May 2012, the late Gavin McFadyen, director of the Centre for Investigative Journalism (CIJ), gathered together a group of prominent whistleblowers to suggest that we coordinate our individual efforts to create an improved response to whistleblowing. Out of this meeting was born a self-help group, Whistleblowers UK. I was voted in as executive chairman, based on their observation that I was one of the least damaged and, with a personal employment drought, had the necessary time and energy and project management/organisational experience to devote to its establishment.
Dr Deepa Driver teaches and does research in the areas of state and corporate accountability, financial regulation, risk, and ethics, at the University of Reading. For about five years, Deepa acted as the legal observer in the UK extradition case of Julian Assange, attending almost all administrative and substantive hearings. She served in this role on behalf of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, the European Lawyers for Democracy and Human Rights (ELDH) and the Union of European Liberals (UEL) grouping at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
Deepa's career to date includes roles in banking, financial regulation, advisory work, and in the not-for-profit sector. Deepa is currently chair of negotiators for the union side, on the Joint Negotiating Committee of the £75 billion sector-wide USS pension scheme of the higher education sector in the UK. She also serves as a member of the national executive of her trade union, the University and College Union (UCU), as vice-chair of Finance Watch, Brussels, and as vice-chair of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers.
It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn't happening. It didn't matter.
Introduction
In June 2024, after a David versus Goliath battle, Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange was freed, having survived a decade and a half of persecution and prosecution. Assange accepted a plea agreement.
Craig Murray worked for the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office between 1984 and 2004, with postings to Nigeria, Poland, Ghana, and Uzbekistan. While he was the British ambassador to Uzbekistan between 2002 and 2004, he discovered evidence of the British government's complicity with torture and widespread human rights violations. After he blew the whistle about this situation, he was subject to a smear campaign, but was ultimately exonerated. He is the author of number of books on subjects of history and his own experiences a whistleblower. The following is a transcript of Murray's talk at Newcastle University, on 15 May 2019.
Craig Murray's speech at Newcastle University
There are so many things that make it so hard to become a whistleblower. One of which I find emotionally most difficult is the fact that the people who turn on you and turn against you are your friends and colleagues. I had worked in the Foreign Office for over 20 years when I left over the UK's complicity in torture. I found that, not only were my friends and colleagues involved in complicity in torture, most of them not liking it, but nobody was prepared to lose their career over it. But some of the people I knew were prepared to turn against me and take an active part in not just my dismissal but my potential prosecution. Discovering that the people, your milieu, the people you associate with are not actually your friends is a very hard thing to do.
After World War II, Japan was severely degraded, and its people were generally devastated. For the country’s very survival, the beleaguered Japanese people sought to rebuild economically and reputationally. During this postwar period, Japanese business, union, and government leaders grappled with lagging progress and the necessary abandonment of prior transwar social and business arrangements. They sought new strategies to stimulate advancement in the wake of a governmental vacuum, labor unrest, and the threat of communism. In this context, Moral Re-Armament (MRA) took root in some areas of Japan during the period when Japan’s gross domestic product (GDP) grew from $102 billion in 1945 to $420 billion by 1961. MRA introduced Western-oriented societal values, intended to help nurture individual and societal change, including collaborative relations between unions and management. Of the first eight Japanese prime ministers after World War II, six either worked openly with or endorsed the MRA movement.
Drawing on the two-factor model of organizational justice and social exchange theory, this study investigates the mediating roles of procedural and distributive justice in the relationship between work locus of control (WLOC) and leader–member exchange (LMX). Using data collected from two cultural contexts – the United States and South Korea – this research further examines whether culture moderates the indirect relationship between WLOC and LMX through perceived justice. The findings indicate that subordinates with an internal WLOC tend to report higher-quality LMX relationships, and that both procedural and distributive justice partially mediate this relationship. Moderated mediation analyses reveal that the indirect effects of WLOC on LMX via justice perceptions are significantly stronger in the U.S. sample than in the Korean sample. These results contribute to the literature by identifying perceived justice as a key psychological mechanism linking individual traits to relational outcomes at work, and by highlighting how cultural values shape this process.
This article contributes to the understanding of why some management experiences of non-family CEOs (NF-CEOs) in privately owned family firms (POFFs) are successful, while others are not. It uses the flexible pattern-matching technique to examine seven case studies of POFFs with different experiences in recruiting NF-CEOs. Drawing on human capital specificity and heterogeneity, as well as socio-emotional wealth perspectives, our analysis suggests that NF-CEOs and owning families must invest time to gain knowledge of each other. Consequently, longer minimum tenures are required compared to non-FFs, making the alignment of NF-CEO and successor life cycles crucial for success. A cooperative and long-term-oriented personality of NF-CEOs is also relevant to fit the context of family businesses. This article is the first to adapt the specificity of human capital theory to the study of NF-CEOs.
We analyze the effects of limited investor attention on the stock market reaction to innovation announcements and develop a new measure of patents’ economic value. We hypothesize that, when some investors pay delayed attention to innovation announcements, there will be a post-announcement drift in addition to the announcement effect, with the former decreasing and the latter increasing in investor attention. Using media coverage and abnormal Google search volume as investor attention proxies, we find consistent evidence. Our new attention-weighted measure of patents’ economic value has greater predictive power for future firm performance than measures based on the announcement effect alone.
This study explores the relationships between board internationalization, board size, and strategic change of firms from emerging markets. Building upon resource dependency theory (RDT), this study proposes that board internationalization has a positive impact on strategic change. A higher level of nationality heterogeneity on the board of directors, an organization receives more diverse perspectives and experiences from foreign directors. This, in turn, influences firms to identify areas of improvement and engage in strategic change. In addition, conventional wisdom suggests that board size per se has a negative relationship with strategic change. However, this study proposes that large board sizes together with board internationalization can foster strategic change. In other words, board size and board internationalization can jointly counteract the inertial nature of a large board, resulting in strategic change. The analyses of 255 publicly listed firms from nine emerging countries for the 2013–2018 financial years confirm these predictions.
On the basis of signaling and trust theories, we explore the impact of focal firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on their collaborative innovation (co-innovation). We argue that high ESG performance serves as a positive signal that focal firms engage less in opportunistic behavior in the co-innovation process. This, in turn, makes it easier for focal firms to gain the trust of potential external innovation collaborators (collaborators) and ultimately increases the level of co-innovation in focal firms. Guided by signaling and trust theories, we further argue that heavy polluting firm attributes and historical co-innovation alter the impact of ESG signals on collaborators’ trust, which in turn leads to heterogeneity in the positive impact of ESG performance on firms’ co-innovation. Based on empirical data on A-share manufacturing companies listed in China from 2010 to 2021, we obtained empirical evidence to support the above theoretical arguments. This study provides new insights for a refined understanding of the innovation consequences of ESG performance and important implications for shareholders and policymakers to better encourage and guide firms in co-innovation.
Resilient enterprises thrive under adverse conditions given their preparedness for crises. This study proposes that executives’ vigilant managerial cognition is essential for enhancing enterprise resilience. To measure this cognition, the study developed a textual index using machine learning methods and analyzed a sample of Chinese enterprises to assess the impact of executives’ vigilant managerial cognition on enterprise resilience. The findings indicate that this cognition is positively related to enterprise resilience, where the relationship is stronger in enterprises with robust internal controls. The primary contribution of this study is the conceptualization of vigilant managerial cognition and its established positive relationship with enterprise resilience. Furthermore, by introducing a novel quantitative measure of managerial cognition through textual analysis and machine learning, the study paves the way for future research on managerial cognition within firms.
This study examined the motivational factors influencing African immigrants in New Zealand to become entrepreneurs and the factors that ensured their business success. Data were collected from 117 participants through survey questions employing the Qualtrics platform and its link was sent to participants in the Auckland region. Auckland was decided on for data collection, being the most populated city and the business nerve centre of New Zealand. The research was conducted using a descriptive and quantitative approach. From the analysis, the study found that passion for business entrepreneurship, flexibility, financial independence, generic independence, autonomy, and being one’s own boss are the most highly motivational factors for influencing African immigrants in New Zealand to opt for business ownership. The study also found that the six highest-rated reasons for African immigrants’ entrepreneurial business success in New Zealand were readiness to make sacrifices to succeed, always giving the best in everything that had to be done, the importance of action, a belief that everything is possible if the entrepreneur believes he/she can do it, the challenge of taking on new projects, and learning lessons from past failure. These findings are the most important factors helping African immigrant business owners in New Auckland Zealand to attain entrepreneurial and business success. This research maintains that the results shed light on why African migrants adopt business entrepreneurship and gear themselves up for success in New Zealand.
We propose CTREND, a new trend factor for cryptocurrency returns, which aggregates price and volume information across different time horizons. Using data on more than 3,000 coins, we employ machine learning methods to exploit information from various technical indicators. The resulting signal reliably predicts cryptocurrency returns. The effect cannot be subsumed by known factors and remains robust across different subperiods, market states, and alternative research designs. Moreover, it survives the impact of transaction costs and persists in big and liquid coins. Finally, an asset pricing model that incorporates CTREND outperforms competing factor models, providing a superior explanation of cryptocurrency returns.
With China’s economy transitioning into a post-industrial phase focused on knowledge and technology, there has been a notable shift in the patterns of Chinese Outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). This change has led to the emergence of new research perspectives, underscoring the importance of organizing them systematically. To address this, our research presents a thorough analysis of eighty-eight publications examining Chinese OFDI in natural resource-rich (NRR) and technology-intensive (TI) locations across various global regions and countries. Based on the geographical scope and comprehensive coverage of studies published between 1998 and 2023, we summarize the major themes, theories, and methodologies used in this research area. Identifying three elements related to Chinese investment (antecedents and motives, operational strategies, and investment outcomes), we develop a matrix based on the discussion of Chinese firms’ investment behavior in the foreign environment in which they operate. We describe the theoretical distinctions between investments in NRR global regions, such as Africa and Central Asia, and TI regions, such as Europe and North America, with regard to technology acquisition, creation, co-creation, and transfer. We identify several research sub-themes (e.g., control and learning mechanisms, technology transfer, intellectual property, etc.) that remain under-investigated and suggest future research opportunities.
This study examines coronavirus disease 2019-related law-drafting using Finnish data. The impact assessments of 17 government bills are analyzed using content analysis. These 17 government bills have been selected based on their societal significance and are related to restrictions on fundamental rights under the Finnish constitution. The purpose of this study is to examine how ex ante impact assessments and the planning of forthcoming implementation and ex post impact assessments have been carried out in these regulatory projects. The results indicate that, based on the ex ante assessments presented in the government bills, it is not possible to conclude that the benefits of the proposed restrictions would exceed the costs. Despite the rush, uncertainty and the incompleteness of information caused by the pandemic, the government bills should clearly justify why the presented regulation is the preferred alternative. Furthermore, the subsequent ex post impact assessment measures have been planned to produce information only about the general development of the pandemic situation instead of the functionality of individual restriction regulations. In this respect, special attention should have been paid to the individual restriction measures.