To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study examines how university curriculum reforms that increase course selection flexibility influence entrepreneurial outcomes. Departing from traditional emphasis on educational attainment, we explore how institutional changes in education shape entrepreneurial tendencies among alumni. Leveraging a reform that removed constraints on course selection at a major university, we find that increased educational choice significantly fosters entrepreneurship. Our analysis reveals partial support for the moderating effects of individual, family, and spatial factors: the positive impact of these reforms is contingent on the type of electives and courses taken, with stronger effects observed among alumni with entrepreneurial parents, those born in urban areas, and those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. These groups leverage specific course patterns to align their educational choices with entrepreneurial aspirations, enhancing their likelihood of pursuing entrepreneurial ventures. However, these findings also underscore the potential for educational reforms to exacerbate inequalities, disproportionately benefiting those with preexisting advantages. By integrating insights on institutional changes, course-taking patterns, and individual moderators, this study advances understanding of the interplay between education and entrepreneurship, offering implications for designing more equitable educational policies.
This editorial essay describes what is phenomenon-based research and why it is important to conduct indigenous Chinese management research. Grounded in the Chinese context, the author identifies emerging new organizational phenomena in the digital age that calls for new theoretical explanations and empirical validation. Adopting an evolution of theories perspective, the author outlines the various paths that can move a new theory explaining an indigenous phenomenon toward becoming a universal theory that can transcend time and space.
This editorial essay introduces three approaches for advancing management research through contextualization in Chinese management research. While the Chinese context offers fertile ground for theoretical contributions, scholars often struggle to effectively leverage contextual elements to extend existing theories. I address this gap by presenting three approaches: the counter-intuitive approach, which challenges established assumptions by identifying relationships that contradict conventional wisdom; the contrasting approach, which reveals paradoxical or opposing effects of organizational phenomena across different contextual conditions; and the theory integration approach, which combines different theoretical perspectives to create richer understanding of organizational phenomena. Using published works on guanxi and social networks as examples, I demonstrate how these approaches help scholars articulate why the Chinese context matters theoretically. These approaches provide researchers with tools to move beyond simply testing Western theories in China toward making substantive theoretical contributions that extend and enrich existing management theories through contextualization.
The institutional logics perspective provides a powerful theoretical lens that emphasizes how meanings and practices are intertwined in relatively enduring configurations that can profoundly shape organizational behavior across space and time. In this article, we propose the need for a broader research agenda on the dynamics of institutional logics in the Chinese context, particularly in three aspects. We begin by elaborating on the distinct configuration of logics in China, where state logic is more dominant and often directs other logics, thus shaping organizational behavior differently than its Western counterpart. We then argue for the need to examine (1) the change of logics per se, leveraging China’ market transition, which provides a unique opportunity to observe how existing configurations of logics undergo transformational change and regain coherence; (2) the governance of logics, focusing on the influence of social evaluators and command posts; and (3) the diffusion of the China Model, a distinct configuration of logics and orders, to other countries through the Chinese state’s political and economic campaigns.
Since the 1980s, state capacity has been a major explanation for countries leaving the middle-income trap. However, this literature is unable to explain the failed experiences of countries with relatively high state capacity. This was the case of Chile after the unsuccessful enaction of a series of policies in the mid-2010s to upgrade the country’s position in the lithium value chain. To understand this failure, we combine the literature on developmental states and the literature on business power. We use the concept of institutional business power to understand how business actions erode state capacities leading to countries’ persistent inability to leave the middle-income trap. In the case of Chile, despite the relatively high levels of state capacity, previous processes of deregulation and privatization in the country configured a situation favorable to business’ monopolization of information and technical knowledge about lithium production and innovation processes that directly affected the capacity of the state to regulate the sector, let alone implement policies designed to upgrade the industry. The article highlights the need to investigate further the role of not just the state, but of the private sector in either facilitating or blocking value chain upgrading in countries caught in the middle-income trap.
Andrew Fowler is an award-winning investigative journalist based in Australia. He is a reporter for ABC's Foreign Correspondent and Four Corners programmes. He has been chief of staff and acting foreign editor of The Australian newspaper and a reporter with SBS Dateline and Channel 7, as well as heading up the ABC's investigative unit. He has published numerous newspaper articles and books on the subject of whistleblowing. His ABC 2012 documentary about Julian Assange and WikiLeaks won the New York Festival Gold Medal.
When the Metropolitan Police dragged Julian Assange from the Ecuador embassy in London in April 2019, the world witnessed the physical representation of what governments in the West have been attempting to do to journalism, particularly since 9/11: silence it or control it. In many cases, criminalise it. From the moment Assange and WikiLeaks revealed the atrocities being committed by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan – including the gunship video Collateral Murder in 2010 – they were singled out and targeted. But it was not that, or even the quarter of a million US State Department cables, or even the Gitmo papers, that told us so much about the US use of torture at Guantanamo Bay – released by WikiLeaks in April 2011 – which reignited the US desire to file for Assange's extradition from the UK.
Recent digital developments provide new opportunities for entrepreneurs to market and present themselves. For solo entrepreneurs, where the business and entrepreneur coincide, self-presentation strategies on social media may be particularly relevant. Using regression analysis, we investigate the personal and business-related characteristics of solo entrepreneurs who typically rely heavily on social media for self-presentation. Data are used from a unique survey conducted among solo entrepreneurs in Austria. At the conceptual level, the impression management theory of Goffman from the 1950s creates the theoretical background, and our paper links three fields of research: social media use, impression management, and aspects relating to solo self-employment. The empirical analysis reveals that the typical solo entrepreneur who attaches great importance to social media use for self-presentation purposes is a female entrepreneur running a young business (younger than 5 years) in the retail industry, with good mental health but relatively poor financial health.
This chapter describes the rapidly changing landscape surrounding whistleblowers, particularly those working in government, national security, and intelligence roles. Whistleblowing protections: both national legislation and internal organisational policies can and do fail to protect the individual (Melzer, 2022; Mendez, 2012). When this occurs, the whistleblower can find themselves vulnerable to retaliation. Central to this is the experience of being publicly named, which can result in blacklisting, smear tactics, and other more serious forms of retaliation. Yet changes are occurring. Networked whistleblowing has represented a step-change here, enabling the collectivisation of information disclosure and, crucially, the maintenance of anonymity for the discloser. Some pressing gaps and questions remain, as we outline here.
Whistleblowing laws: new provisions for some
The activist Ralph Nader was among the first to popularise the term ‘whistleblower’. He defined whistleblowing as ‘An act of a man or woman who, believing that the public interest overrides the interest of the organization he serves, blows the whistle that the organization is involved in corrupt, illegal, fraudulent or harmful activity’ (Nader, 1972, p ili). Lawyers Tom Devine and Tarek Massarani (2011, p 316), working for one of the world's biggest whistleblower protection organisations, define the whistleblower as, ‘A person of good conscience who uses free speech rights to challenge abuses of power that betray the public trust and who acts for the good of the public at great person risk.’
Ian Foxley is a retired army lieutenant colonel and the founding chairman of Whistleblowers UK and Parrhesia Inc. He spent 14 years in the telecommunications industry until 2010 where, as programme director for a £1.96 billion UK/Saudi government defence procurement contract, he uncovered corrupt payments to the Cayman Islands and blew the whistle to the Serious Fraud Office.
Introduction
Whistleblowing is not concentrated on a single point in time: it is a process emerging from an observation of anomalies, measured against personal values, experience and training to a critical decision point of action and thence to surviving the aftermath and rehabilitation into some form of normal existence. In this chapter I will describe my personal experience of whistleblowing, along with my thought processes surrounding the decision to act and the complications that ensured that it took over a decade to come to a conclusion. In that time, I have reflected deeply over the whole process and been drawn into academic study of both the detrimental effects and personal strategies needed to survive them and, most lately, the root causes for individuals speaking up or remaining silent. My experience and research have driven me to actively campaign for change, ensuring stronger protections for future whistleblowers, and a belief that employers and organisations need to rethink their attitudes of loyalty and responsibility towards their employees and members to allow an honest revelation of concerns and an open mind to hear them.
John Kiriakou worked for the CIA for 15 years. He worked as a counter-terrorism operations officer and worked in Greece and later as chief of counterterrorist operations in Pakistan. He describes being the only CIA officer to refuse to participate in the CIA programme for ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ – later identified as a torture programme. He blew the whistle about the use of torture as official US policy in the ‘War on Terror’. As a result of his disclosures Kiriakou was sentenced to 30 months in prison.1 He now works as a human rights campaigner and journalist and is the author of several books on whistleblowing and the US ‘War on Terror’. Kirkiakou's story has been relayed in the New Yorker, ABS News, and many other outlets.2 Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the International Committee of the Red Cross continue to report on the human rights abuses in US government military prisons. The following is a transcript of Kiriakou's talk at Newcastle University, on 15 May 2019.
John Kiriakou's speech at Newcastle University
My name is John Kiriakou. I was very fortunate to have spent 15 years at the CIA. The first half of my career was in Middle Eastern analysis, and the second half was in counterterrorism operations. I used to think was a great thing. I thoroughly enjoyed my career, and I rose through the ranks of the CIA quickly.
Grounded in institutional theory, this study delves into the heterogeneous responses of politically connected top executives (PCTEs) to uniform institutional requirements for corporate environmental responsibility (CER). Specifically, we scrutinized the moderating role of organizational visibility in shaping the association between PCTEs and both environmentally responsible and irresponsible practices. Analyzing data from listed Chinese firms in heavily polluting industries spanning from 2010 to 2018, the findings indicate that PCTEs contribute to an increase in firms’ environmentally responsible activities and a decrease in their environmentally irresponsible activities. Notably, the impact on environmentally responsible activities is significant only for privately controlled PCTEs. Furthermore, the moderating influence of organizational visibility is validated. The implications of these findings for the broader research on political connections and CER are thoroughly discussed.
No one is ever going to tell me again that I have to lie, that I have a duty to lie, that it's alright because someone's telling me to do it. No one is going to say that and have me believe him, or think I have to obey him.
Daniel Ellsberg, 2003
Where everybody lies about everything of importance, the truthteller, whether he knows it or not, has begun to act; he, too, has engaged himself in political business, for in the unlikely event that he survives, he has made a start towards changing the world.
Hannah Arendt, 1968
The last 50 years have seen dramatic news stories featuring whistleblowers informing the public of systemic corruption arising from state and corporate power concentrations. Global scandals have emerged related to tax evasion, the 2008 global financial crisis, environmental pollution, climate change, mass surveillance, war crimes, and the mishandling of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Much of our knowledge of these scandals come from whistleblowers who have spoken out against misconduct they have witnessed.
The practice of whistleblowing is important in reforming corporate and state misconduct. It is also a crucial mechanism of democratic oversight, which addresses both state and corporate corruption and human rights abuses (Benkler, 2014; Jaffer, 2021). When Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times in 1971, the US public learned a different side to the official history of their nation's involvement in Vietnam (Ellsberg, 2003).
The contributing authors of this book highlight their personal experiences of whistleblowing or supporting whistleblowers: their struggle to get their voices heard, the retaliation and smear campaigns against them, and, ultimately, their ongoing efforts to effect reform and social change. They each shed light on the process, practice, and impact of whistleblowing today. Each case comprises a unique set of circumstances, but they share many commonalities and, in what follows, we explore the meanings for existing understandings of whistleblowing. The authors each describe their experience of personal and professional transformation through whistleblowing – often becoming activists and politicised subjects as a result. Yet this was by no means easy, and the authors also shared common obstacles to speaking up: a lack of adequate legal protections and, in some cases, a weaponisation of legislation aimed at silencing whistleblowers and their supporters – and all in light of a weakened field of investigative journalism. We note how many contributions speak to the erosion of democratic institutions formerly taken for granted.
Nevertheless, we also observe and wish to emphasise the ultimate impact of each person's disclosure as representing an intervention in efforts to conceal serious wrongdoing from the public and, through these interventions, opening the possibility for change. As organisational scholars, we are particularly concerned with the organising dynamics evidenced in the accounts presented here, along with the valuable insights emerging from people's lived experiences.
Family dynamics can significantly influence entrepreneurship, yet the temporal complexities of this relationship remain inadequately explored. This special issue addresses this gap by emphasizing the intricate interplay between internal family evolvability such as generational transitions and identity shifts, cultural continuity, and external adaptability to rapidly changing economic, institutional, and technological contexts in China. We introduce a dual tuning model that highlights how entrepreneurial and family firms (FFs) strategically synchronize their internal and external temporal rhythms to manage conflicts and optimize performance. This lead article reviews existing literature, articulates the dual tuning model, and synthesizes insights from the articles in this special issue to illuminate how Chinese FFs navigate tensions between evolving internal dynamics and external market demands. We conclude by identifying promising future research avenues that leverage this temporal perspective to deepen our understanding of family dynamics and entrepreneurship in China.
This article provides a brief Introduction to this special Journal of Benefit–Cost Analysis issue dedicated to comments filed by former presidents of the Society for Benefit Cost Analysis and editors of this journal on the Office of Management and Budget’s draft Circular A–4 on regulatory impact analysis guidelines.