To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let us consider the following long standing question:
(*) Suppose that X, Y are infinite dimensional Banach spaces. Does then exist a compact non-nuclear operator T:X → Y?
The problem has positive answer under quite general assumptions. Positive answer of the finite–dimensional version of (*) was given in. Close to (*) is another problem posed by Grothendieck and solved by the example of Pisier–s space P: P is an infinite dimensional Banach space such that
1) p ⊗ εp = p ⊗ πp
and
2) P and P' are of cotype 2.
G. Pisier already observed that if P were reflexive or merely if P* had R.N. property then every bounded operator T:P → P' would be nuclear and thus (*) would have negative answer. Indeed, 1) implies that every T:P → P' is integral. Unfortunately no reflexive Pisier's space P is known to exist. We may also translate the problem into the category of locally convex spaces:
Suppose that X, Y are non-nuclear locally convex spaces. Does then exist a compact non-nuclear operator T:X→Y? This generalized problem has a negative answer,: There is a non-nuclear F space X and a non-nuclear DF space Z = Y' such that every continuous operator T: X→Z is (strongly) nuclear. X and Z are obtained via Pisier's observation mentioned above from an example with properties similar to 1):
There are non-nuclear F spaces X, Y such that X ⊗ ε Y = X ⊗ ε Y. Moreover X, Y are hilbertizable.
This largely expository article describes some recent results concerning the mixed summing norm Πp, 1 as applied to operators on ℓ∞-spaces (especially the finite-dimensional spaces). The whole subject of summing operators and their norms can be said to have started with a result on Π2, 1 – the theorem of Orlicz (1933) that the identity operators in ℓ2 and ℓ1 are (2, 1)-summing. However, since that time the study of mixed summing norms has been somewhat neglected in favour of the elegant and powerful theory of the “unmixed” summing norms Πlp. A breakthrough hasnow been provided by the theorem of Pisier, which does for mixed summing norms what the fundamental theorem of Pietsch does for unmixed ones (see e.g.). One version of Pisier's theorem states that the operator can be factorised through a Lorentz function space Lp, 1 (λ). Such spaces were introduced in, and are discussed in and. However, it is not easy to find a really simple outline of the definition and basic properties of these spaces adapted to the (obviously simpler) finite-dimensional case, so the present paper includes a brief attempt to provide one.
It is of particular interest to compare the value of Π2, 1 and Π2 for operators on ℓ∞ or. It is a well-known fact, underlying the famous Grothendieck inequality, that there is a constant K, independent of n, such that for all operators T from to ℓ1 or ℓ2, we have Π2 (T)≤ K∥T∥. This equates to saying that Π2 (T) s K'Π2, 1 (T) for such T.
By
Fernando Cobos, Dpto. de Matemáticas, Univ. Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain,
Ivam Resina, Inst. de Matemática, Univ. Estadual de Campinas,S.Paulo, Brasil
Abstract. We prove a representation theorem in terms of finite rank operators for operators belonging to. Some information on the tensor product of operators belonging to these ideals is also obtained.
INTRODUCTION.
The n-th approximation number an (T) of a bounded linear operator T∈ (E, F) acting between the Banach spaces E and F, is defined as
For the ideal is formed by all operators T betwen Banach space, with a finite quasi-norm
Weyl ideals are defined in a similar way, by substituting approximation numbers for Weyl numbers (xn (T)). Ideals have been studied by the authors in. Since xn (T) ≤ an (T) for al 1 n ∈ N (see), as a direct consequence of, Thm. 3, we have
Theorem 1. Let 0 < n ∞. Then there is a constant M = M such that for any complex Banach space E and any operator T ∈∞, ∞ (E, E) the following holds
Here (λn (T)) denotes the sequence of all eigenvalues of the compact operator T counted accoding to their algebraic multiplicities and ordered such that |λ1 (T)| ≥ |λ2(T)| ≥ … ≥ 0.
In this note we continue the study of -ideals. We derive a representation theorem for the elements of in terms of finite rank operators. This result is on the same lines as we established in for the case of the ideals (0 < q < ∞). We also obtain some information on the tensor pordect of operator belonging to the scale of the ideals.
This is the final paper of the series of three papers under the same title. The finite dimensional theory developed in the first of them 7 contains first of all:
(a) a calculus having among its consequences the calculi of convex subdifferentials and generalized gradients of Clarke (henceforth sometimes abbreviated C.g.g.) in the most general form which is partly due to the fact that in a finite dimensional space
for any convex function f and
for any SX (A means approximate, C means Clarke); and (b) a theorem stating that approximate subdifferentials are minimal (as sets) among all possible subdifferentials satisfying one or another set of conditions (usually very natural).
For a typical convex body in Ed a typical shadow boundary under parallel illumination has infinite (d - 2)-dimensional Hausdorff measurewhile having Hausdorff dimension d2.
By a well-known theorem of Szemerdi 8 any set of integers that has positive density contains arithmetic progressions of arbitrary length. One might expect that there are conditions of similar generality, under which an integer set contains arbitrarily long strings of consecutive integers, i.e., arithmetic progressions with 1 as common difference. Results of this kind would be of great importance because of potential applications to arithmetically interesting sets such as the set n: (n) = 1, where (n) is the Liouville function, or the sets
where P(n) denotes the greatest prime factor of n and 0<< 1. One naturally expects that such sets contain arbitrarily long strings of consecutive integers, but no results in this direction are known, and the problem seems to be a very difficult one, perhaps comparable in depth to the prime k-tuple conjecture.
The theorem of Aleksandrov-Fenchel-Jessen states that two convex bodies in n-dimensional Euclidean space En which, for some p l, , n - l 007D;, have equal area measures of order p (see Section 2 for a definition) differ only by a translation. Two independent proofs were given by Aleksandrov 1 and by Fenchel and Jessen 18 see also Busemann 5 (p. 70) and LeichtweiG 25 (p. 319), 26. If the boundaries of the two bodies are sufficiently smooth and of everywhere positive curvatures, then the assumption of the theorem is equivalent to saying that at points with parallel outer normals the p-th elementary symmetric functions of the principal radii of curvature of both boundary hypersurfaces are the same. For this case, Chern 6 gave a uniqueness proof by means of an integral formula.
The purpose of this paper is to take some first steps the investigation of the negative moments
where k>0 and12, and the related discrete moments
whereruns over the complex zeros of the zeta-function. We assume the Riemann hypothesis (RH) throughout; it then follows that Ik(, T) converges for every k > 0 when>but for no k =when =. We further note that Jk(T) is only defined for all T if all the zerosare simple and, in that case, Ik(, T) converges for all k<.
Ramsey's theorem implies that every function f:0, 1ℝ isconvex or concave on an infinite set. We show that there is an upper semicontinuous function which is not convex or concave on any uncountable set. We investigate those functions which are not convex on any r element set (r). A typical result: if f is bounded from below and is not convex on any infiniteset then there exists an interval on which the graph of f can be covered by the graphs of countably many strictly concave functions.