To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We study a discrete time self-interacting random process on graphs, which we call greedy random walk. The walker is located initially at some vertex. As time evolves, each vertex maintains the set of adjacent edges touching it that have not yet been crossed by the walker. At each step, the walker, being at some vertex, picks an adjacent edge among the edges that have not traversed thus far according to some (deterministic or randomized) rule. If all the adjacent edges have already been traversed, then an adjacent edge is chosen uniformly at random. After picking an edge the walker jumps along it to the neighbouring vertex. We show that the expected edge cover time of the greedy random walk is linear in the number of edges for certain natural families of graphs. Examples of such graphs include the complete graph, even degree expanders of logarithmic girth, and the hypercube graph. We also show that GRW is transient in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ for all d ≥ 3.
We consider two graph colouring problems in which edges at distance at most t are given distinct colours, for some fixed positive integer t. We obtain two upper bounds for the distance-t chromatic index, the least number of colours necessary for such a colouring. One is a bound of (2-ε)Δt for graphs of maximum degree at most Δ, where ε is some absolute positive constant independent of t. The other is a bound of O(Δt/log Δ) (as Δ → ∞) for graphs of maximum degree at most Δ and girth at least 2t+1. The first bound is an analogue of Molloy and Reed's bound on the strong chromatic index. The second bound is tight up to a constant multiplicative factor, as certified by a class of graphs of girth at least g, for every fixed g ≥ 3, of arbitrarily large maximum degree Δ, with distance-t chromatic index at least Ω(Δt/log Δ).
We are given a graph G with n vertices, where a random subset of k vertices has been made into a clique, and the remaining edges are chosen independently with probability $\frac12$. This random graph model is denoted $G(n,\frac12,k)$. The hidden clique problem is to design an algorithm that finds the k-clique in polynomial time with high probability. An algorithm due to Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov [3] uses spectral techniques to find the hidden clique with high probability when $k = c \sqrt{n}$ for a sufficiently large constant c > 0. Recently, an algorithm that solves the same problem was proposed by Feige and Ron [12]. It has the advantages of being simpler and more intuitive, and of an improved running time of O(n2). However, the analysis in [12] gives a success probability of only 2/3. In this paper we present a new algorithm for finding hidden cliques that both runs in time O(n2) (that is, linear in the size of the input) and has a failure probability that tends to 0 as n tends to ∞. We develop this algorithm in the more general setting where the clique is replaced by a dense random graph.
We consider irreducible Markov chains on a finite state space. We show that the mixing time of any such chain is equivalent to the maximum, over initial states x and moving large sets (As)s, of the hitting time of (As)s starting from x. We prove that in the case of the d-dimensional torus the maximum hitting time of moving targets is equal to the maximum hitting time of stationary targets. Nevertheless, we construct a transitive graph where these two quantities are not equal, resolving an open question of Aldous and Fill on a ‘cat and mouse’ game.
We prove a “special point” result for products of elliptic modular surfaces, elliptic curves, multiplicative groups and complex lines, and deduce a result about vanishing linear combinations of singular moduli and roots of unity.
We study the (1:b) Maker–Breaker component game, played on the edge set of a d-regular graph. Maker's aim in this game is to build a large connected component, while Breaker's aim is to prevent him from doing so. For all values of Breaker's bias b, we determine whether Breaker wins (on any d-regular graph) or Maker wins (on almost every d-regular graph) and provide explicit winning strategies for both players.
To this end, we prove an extension of a theorem of Gallai, Hasse, Roy and Vitaver about graph orientations without long directed simple paths.
We prove several results from different areas of extremal combinatorics, giving complete or partial solutions to a number of open problems. These results, coming from areas such as extremal graph theory, Ramsey theory and additive combinatorics, have been collected together because in each case the relevant proofs are quite short.
We study the consequences of stationary and semi-stationary set reflection. We show that the semi-stationary reflection principle implies the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis, the failure of the weak square principle, etc. We also consider two cardinal tree properties introduced recently by Weiss, and prove that they follow from stationary and semi-stationary set reflection augmented with a weak form of Martin’s Axiom. We also show that there are some differences between the two reflection principles, which suggests that stationary set reflection is analogous to supercompactness, whereas semi-stationary set reflection is analogous to strong compactness.
The mixed volume V (Kl,…,Kn), which is a centralnotion of the Brunn–Minkowski theory, remains unchanged if the same volume-preserving affinetransformation of ℝn is applied to each of the convex bodiesKl,…,Kn. The general theory of mixed volumes thusbelongs to the affine geometry of convex bodies.
This affine geometry of convex bodies has much more to offer. In fact, affine-invariantconstructions, functionals and extremum problems for convex bodies are a rich source of questionsand results of considerable geometric beauty. Moreover, surprising relations to some other fieldsand unexpected applications have surfaced. In some parts of this field, the Brunn–Minkowskitheory may be of help, and its extensions considered in the previous chapter play a prominent roleand have had considerable impact, while other parts require various tools and methods of their own,and some new approaches still need to be discovered.
This last chapter is meant as an outlook. We collect and present various aspects of the affinegeometry of convex bodies, but give very few proofs. We hope that this survey will be helpful forinterested readers to find their own way into this fascinating field and its originalliterature.
The Brunn–Minkowski theory is the classical core of the geometry of convex bodies. Itoriginated with the thesis of Hermann Brunn in 1887 and is in its essential parts the creation ofHermann Minkowski, around the turn of the century. The well-known survey of Bonnesen and Fenchel in1934 collected what was already an impressive body of results, though important developments werestill to come, through the work of A. D. Aleksandrov and others in the thirties. In recent decades,the theory of convex bodies has expanded considerably; new topics have been developed and originallyneglected branches of the subject have gained in interest. For instance, the combinatorial aspects,the theory of convex polytopes and the local theory of Banach spaces attract particular attentionnow. Nevertheless, the Brunn–Minkowski theory has remained of constant interest owing to itsvarious new applications, its connections with other fields, and the challenge of some resistantopen problems.
Aiming at a brief characterization of Brunn–Minkowski theory, one might say that it is theresult of merging two elementary notions for point sets in Euclidean space: vector addition andvolume. The vector addition of convex bodies, usually called Minkowski addition, has many facets ofindependent geometric interest. Combined with volume, it leads to the fundamentalBrunn–Minkowski inequality and the notion of mixed volumes. The latter satisfy a series ofinequalities which, due to their flexibility, solve many extremal problems and yield severaluniqueness results. Looking at mixed volumes from a local point of view, one is led to mixed areameasures.
The theory of mixed volumes is a powerful tool for treating some questions on closed convexhypersurfaces from the point of view of differential geometry, but in a general form withoutdifferentiability assumptions. Under smoothness assumptions, the results we have in mind concern thedetermination of closed convex hypersurfaces from curvature functions, such as Gauss curvature, meancurvature and their generalizations. Here ‘determination’ comprises questions ofexistence, uniqueness and stability. Without differentiability assumptions, the usual curvaturefunctions, namely the elementary symmetric functions of the principal curvatures on the boundary ofa convex body or of the principal radii of curvature on the spherical image, have to be replaced bycurvature measures and area measures, respectively. The area measures are particularly accessible tothe Brunn–Minkowski theory. In Section 8.1 we treat uniqueness theorems for these. Section8.2 is devoted to Minkowski's existence theorem for convex bodies with given surface areameasure (area measure of order n – 1) and Section 8.3 deals with areameasures of order one, where the existence problem is known as the Christoffel problem. Theintermediate cases, area measures of orders strictly between 1 and n – 1,are briefly considered in Section 8.4. The final section is devoted to corresponding stabilityestimates and to a few uniqueness results for curvature measures.
Uniqueness results
We start with the uniqueness assertion for the determination of a convex body by its surface areameasure. Although this result will be improved and generalized by later theorems, we give itsformulation and proof separately, to show in a basic example the close connection with results onmixed volumes.