To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
There is, in the second (Cambridge, 1911) edition of Burnside's Theory of Groups of Finite Order, an example on p. 371 which must have aroused the curiosity of many mathematicians; a quartic surface, invariant for a group of 24.5! collineations, appears without any indication of its provenance or any explanation of its remarkable property. The example teases, whether because Burnside, if he obtained the result from elsewhere, gives no reference, or because, if the result is original with him, it is difficult to conjecture the process by which he arrived at it. But the quartic form which, when equated to zero, gives the surface, appears, together with associated forms, in a paper by Maschke1, and it is fitting therefore to call both form and surface by his name.
The method here explained affords a complete solution of the problem to determine by geometric construction the values of any number of unknowns connected by an equal number of equations of the first degree. The construction consists entirely of straight lines, and can be carried out by the aid of a straight-edge and a scale; or, in its modified form, in which parallel lines are required, by these instruments along with a set-square.
Let X be any real or complex Banach space. If T is a bounded linear operator on X then denote by N(T) the null space of T and by R(T) the range space of T.
Now if X is finite dimensional and N(T) = N(T2) then also R(T) = R(T2). Therefore X admits a direct sum decomposition
.
Indeed it is easy to see that N(T) = N(T2) implies that and, using dimension theory of finite dimensional spaces, that N(T) and R(T) span the whole space (see, for example, (2, pp. 271–73))
In investigating the properties of the cubic curve C, we are led to consider its Hessian C′, its Cayleyan Γ and the Hessian of its Cayleyan Γ′. In the present paper we propose to deal with the intersections of the systems C + λC and Γ + μΓ′.
In the solution of boundary value problems in mathematical physics by means of integral transforms, we often find that the solution of a particular problem can be expressed in terms of integrals of the type
where r and z are positive, and v and n are integers satisfying the convergencecondition v+n>−1.
Let ABC, A′B′C′ (Fig. 4) be two triangles equiangular in the same sense. Let BC, B′C′ meet in X. Describe circles round BXB′, CXC′ to meet again in O. Then it is easy to see that the triangles BOC, COA, AOB are equiangular in the same sense to the triangles B′OC′, C′OA′, A′OB′ respectively. Hence the triangles AOA′, BOB′, COC′ are similar;
∴ a. AA′, b. BB′, c. CC′ are proportional to a. AO, b. BO, c. CO, where a, b, c are the sides of the triangle ABC.
There are many proofs of the principle of this planimeter, but all that are accessible to me seem a little beyond the grasp of many students who use the instrument. It seems worth while, therefore, to notice the following proof, which, to the best of my knowledge, is new.
In this paper, for R a commutative ring, with identity, of characteristic p, we look at the group G(R) of formal power series with coefficients in R, of the form
and the group operation being substitution. The results obtained give the exponent of the quotient groups Gn(R) of this group, n∈ℕ.
Bernstein's famous result, that any non-zero module M over the n-th Weyl algebra An satisfies GKdim(M)≥GKdim(An)/2, does not carry over to arbitrary simple affine algebras, as is shown by an example of McConnell. Bavula introduced the notion of filter dimension of simple algebra to explain this failure. Here, we introduce the faithful dimension of a module, a variant of the filter dimension, to investigate this phenomenon further and to study a revised definition of holonomic modules. We compute the faithful dimension for certain modules over a variant of the McConnell example to illustrate the utility of this new dimension.
Let OQ, OR be two straight lines meeting at 0, and P any point. Required to draw through P a straight line cutting off a given area OAB from the two straight lines.
Draw PD parallel to OR cutting OQ in D.
Construct a ΔOPC equal to the given area, and such that OP is one of its sides, and that another of its sides, OC, lies along OQ.
Patterson (4) introduced the concept of a pseudo-ring and considered the pseudo-ring of infinite matrices over a ring. In this paper we shall generalize and improve the work of Patterson, using certain additions to the general theory of pseudo-rings which have recently been introduced (1). We shall follow the conventions and notations used in (1) and (4).
If the tangent at a point P on the parabolic curve cy=xn meet the axis of x at M, it is a well-known property that the area between the radius vector OP and the are OP is n times that between the arc OP and the two tangents OM, MP, O being the origin and n > 1. The converse is also true; for taking any point O on a curve as origin and the tangent at O as axis of x, let us seek for the locus of P if the area between OP and the arc OP be n times the area between the arc OP and the tangents OM, MP.
A number of n individuals are separately arranged in order of preference by a number of k electors ; it is desired to ascertain the order of preference in the opinion of the electors as a whole.
Without discussing what is the best solution of this problem, there are three plausible methods, and it will appear as the result of a curious theorem that two of them lead to identical results.
The theory of representing continuous linear operators on function spaces in terms of integrals has had a long and fruitful history, beginning with the Riesz representation theorem in 1909. If T is such an operator, then the standard representation is T (f) = ∫f dμ, where the integral is denned in diverse ways, depending on the nature of the set of functions and the nature of T.
One of the many interesting problems discussed by Ramanujan is concerned with the effect of truncating at its maximum term nn/n! the exponential series for en, where n is a positive integer. When n is large, the sum of the first n terms is, roughly speaking, half the sum of the whole series.