To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A real polynomial $P$ of degree $n$ in one real variable is hyperbolic if its roots are all real. A real-valued function $P$ is called a hyperbolic polynomial-like function of degree $n$ if it has $n$ real zeros and $P^{(n)}$ vanishes nowhere. Denote by $x_k^{(i)}$ the roots of $P^{(i)}$, $k=1,\dots,n-i$, $i=0,\dots,n-1$. Then, in the absence of any equality of the form
(the Rolle theorem). For $n\geq4$ (respectively, for $n\geq5$) not all arrangements without equalities \eqref{*} of $\tfrac12n(n+1)$ real numbers $x_k^{(i)}$ and compatible with \eqref{**} are realizable by the roots of hyperbolic polynomials (respectively, of hyperbolic polynomial-like functions) of degree $n$ and of their derivatives. For $n=5$ and when
we show that all such 102 arrangements are realizable by hyperbolic polynomial-like functions (of which 66 are obtained by hyperbolic polynomials and another 8 by perturbations of such).
We study the solutions of topological type for a class of self-dual vortex theories in two dimensions. We consider the regime corresponding to the limit of small vortex core size with respect to the separation distance between vortices, namely as the scaling parameter $\delta>0$ tends to zero. Using a gluing technique for the corresponding nonlinear elliptic equation on the plane, with any number (finite or countable) of prescribed singular sources, we prove the existence of multi-vortex solutions which behave as a single vortex solution near each vortex point, up to an error exponentially small, as $\delta\to0$. Moreover, in the physically relevant cases, namely when the vortex points are either finite or periodically arranged in the plane, we prove that the multi-vortex solution satisfying a ‘topological condition' is unique, for $\delta>0$ sufficiently small.
with non-negative initial data, where the constant $d>0$ is the Lewis number. Our purpose is to study the global dynamics of solutions under mild decay of initial data as $|x|\rightarrow\infty$. In particular, we show that, for a substantial class of $L^1$ initial data, the exact large-time behaviour of solutions is characterized by a universal, non-Gaussian spatio-temporal profile, subject to the apparent conservation of total mass.
We now turn to real interpolation, and in particular to the Marcinkiewicz theorem, stated by Marcinkiewicz in 1939. Marcinkiewicz was killed in the Second World War, and did not publish a proof; this was done by Zygmund in 1956. The theorem differs from the Riesz–Thorin theorem in several respects: it applies to sublinear mappings as well as to linear mappings; the conditions at the end points of the range are weak type ones and the conclusions can apply to a larger class of spaces than the Lp spaces. But the constants in the inequalities are worse than those that occur in the Riesz–Thorin theorem.
We begin by giving a proof in the simplest case. This is sufficient for many purposes; the proof is similar to the proof of the more sophisticated result that we shall prove later, and introduces techniques that we shall use there.
Theorem 10.1.1 (The Marcinkiewicz interpolation theorem: I)Suppose that 0 < p0 < p < p1 ≤ ∞, and that T : Lp0(Ω, Σ, µ) + Lp1(Ω, Σ, µ) → L0(Φ, T, ν) is sublinear. If T is of weak type (p0, p0), with constant c0, and weak type (p1, p1), with constant c1, then T is of strong type (p, p), with a constant depending only on c0, c1, p0, p1and p.
In this chapter, we introduce the idea of a Banach function space; this provides a general setting for most of the spaces of functions that we consider. As an example, we introduce the class of Orlicz spaces, which includes the Lp spaces for 1 < p < ∞. As always, let (Ω, Σ, µ) be a σ-finite measure space, and let M = M(Ω, Σ, µ) be the space of (equivalence classes of) measurable functions on Ω.
A function norm on M is a function ρ : M → [0, ∞] (note that ∞ is allowed) satisfying the following properties:
(i) ρ(f) = 0 if and only if f = 0; ρ(αf) = |α|ρ(f) for α ≠ 0; ρ(f + g) ≤ ρ(f) + ρ(g).
(ii) If |f| ≤ |g| then ρ(f) ≤ ρ(g).
(iii) If 0 ≤ fn ↗ f then ρ(f) = limn→∞ ρ(fn).
(iv) If A ∈ Σ and µ(A) < ∞ then ρ(IA) < ∞.
(v) If A ∈ Σ and µ(A) < ∞ there exists CA such that ∫A|f| dµ ≤ CA ρ(f) for any f ∈ M.
If ρ is a function norm, the space E = {f ∈ M: ρ(f) < ∞} is called a Banach function space. If f ∈ E, we write ∥f∥E for ρ(f). Then condition (i) ensures that E is a vector space and that ∥.∥E is a norm on it.
Many of the inequalities that we shall establish originally concern finite sequences and finite sums. We then extend them to infinite sequences and infinite sums, and to functions and integrals, and it is these more general results that are useful in applications.
Although the applications can be useful in simple settings – concerning the Riemann integral of a continuous function, for example – the extensions are usually made by a limiting process. For this reason we need to work in the more general setting of measure theory, where appropriate limit theorems hold. We give a brief account of what we need to know; the details of the theory will not be needed, although it is hoped that the results that we eventually establish will encourage the reader to master them. If you are not familiar with measure theory, read through this chapter quickly, and then come back to it when you find that the need arises.
Suppose that Ω is a set. A measure ascribes a size to some of the subsets of Ω. It turns out that we usually cannot do this in a sensible way for all the subsets of Ω, and have to restrict attention to the measurable subsets of Ω. These are the ‘good’ subsets of Ω, and include all the sets that we meet in practice. The collection of measurable sets has a rich enough structure that we can carry out countable limiting operations.
Suppose that (E, ∥.∥E) is a Banach function space and that f ∈ E. Then ∥f∥E = ∥|f|∥E, so that the norm of f depends only on the absolute values of f. For many important function spaces we can say more. Suppose for example that f ∈ Lp, where 1 < p < ∞. By Proposition 1.3.4, ∥f∥p = (p ∫ tp−1µ(|f| > t)dt)1/p, and so ∥f∥p depends only on the distribution of |f|. The same is true for functions in Orlicz spaces. In this chapter, we shall consider properties of functions and spaces of functions with this property.
In order to avoid some technical difficulties which have little real interest, we shall restrict our attention to two cases:
(i) (Ω, Σ, µ) is an atom-free measure space;
(ii) Ω = N or {1, …, n}, with counting measure.
In the second case, we are concerned with sequences, and the arguments are usually, but not always, easier. We shall begin by considering case (i) in detail, and shall then describe what happens in case (ii), giving details only when different arguments are needed.
Suppose that we are in the first case, so that (Ω, Σ, µ) is atom-free. We shall then make use of various properties of the measure space, which follow from the fact that if A ∈ Σ and 0 < t < µ(A) then there exists a subset B of A with µ(B) = t (Exercise 7.1).
Many important inequalities depend upon convexity. In this chapter, we shall establish Jensen's inequality, the most fundamental of these inequalities, in various forms.
A subset C of a real or complex vector space E is convex if whenever x and y are in C and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 1 then (1 − θ)x + θy ∈ C. This says that the real line segment [x, y] is contained in C. Convexity is a real property: in the complex case, we are restricting attention to the underlying real space. Convexity is an affine property, but we shall restrict our attention to vector spaces rather than to affine spaces.
Proposition 4.1.1A subset C of a vector space E is convex if and only if whenever x1, …, xn ∈ C and p1, …, pn are positive numbers with p1 + … + pn = 1 then p1x1 + … + pnxn ∈ C.
Proof The condition is certainly sufficient. We prove necessity by induction on n. The result is trivially true when n = 1, and is true for n = 2, as this reduces to the definition of convexity. Suppose that the result is true for n − 1, and that x1, …, xn and p1, …, pn are as above.
Inequalities lie at the heart of a great deal of mathematics. G.H. Hardy reported Harald Bohr as saying ‘all analysts spend half their time hunting through the literature for inequalities which they want to use but cannot prove’. Inequalities provide control, to enable results to be proved. They also impose constraints; for example, Gromov's theorem on the symplectic embedding of a sphere in a cylinder establishes an inequality that says that the radius of the cylinder cannot be too small. Similar inequalities occur elsewhere, for example in theoretical physics, where the uncertainty principle (which is an inequality) and Bell's inequality impose constraints, and, more classically, in thermodynamics, where the second law provides a fundamental inequality concerning entropy.
Thus there are very many important inequalities. This book is not intended to be a compendium of these; instead, it provides an introduction to a selection of inequalities, not including any of those mentioned above. The inequalities that we consider have a common theme; they relate to problems in real analysis, and more particularly to problems in linear analysis. Incidentally, they include many of the inequalities considered in the fascinating and ground-breaking book Inequalities, by Hardy, Littlewood and Pólya, originally published in 1934.
The first intention of this book, then, is to establish fundamental inequalities in this area. But more importantly, its purpose is to put them in context, and to show how useful they are.