To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We develop a theory of abstract arithmetic Chow rings, where the role of the fibres at infinity is played by a complex of abelian groups that computes a suitable cohomology theory. As particular cases of this formalism we recover the original arithmetic intersection theory of Gillet and Soulé for projective varieties. We introduce a theory of arithmetic Chow groups, which are covariant with respect to arbitrary proper morphisms, and we develop a theory of arithmetic Chow rings using a complex of differential forms with log-log singularities along a fixed normal crossing divisor. This last theory is suitable for the study of automorphic line bundles. In particular, we generalize the classical Faltings height with respect to logarithmically singular hermitian line bundles to higher dimensional cycles. As an application we compute the Faltings height of Hecke correspondences on a product of modular curves.
Dans ce papier nous étudions une correspondance de Jacquet–Langlands locale pour toutes les représentations lisses irréductibles. La correspondance est caractérisée par le fait qu’elle respecte la correspondance de Jacquet–Langlands classique et commute avec le foncteur d’induction parabolique. Elle est compatible dans un sens à préciser au foncteur de Jacquet et à l’involution d’Aubert–Schneider–Stuhler. Nous utilisons cette correspondance pour montrer qu’une certaine classe de représentations d’une forme intérieure de $\mathrm{GL}_n$ sur un corps $p$-adique sont unitarisables. C’est le premier pas dans la preuve de la conjecture U1 de Tadić.
We study a local Jacquet–Langlands correspondence for all smooth irreducible representations. This correspondence is characterized by the fact that it respects the classical Jacquet–Langlands correspondence and it commutes with the parabolic induction functor. It has good behavior with respect to the Jacquet’s functor and the involution of Aubert–Schneider–Stuhler. Using this correspondence, we prove some particular cases of the global Jacquet–Langlands correspondence and we deduce that a certain class of representations of an inner form of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ over a $p$-adic field are unitarizable. This is the first step towards the proof of Conjecture U1 of Tadić.
In this paper we study the category of non-degenerate modules over the Harish-Chandra Schwartz algebra of a p-adic connected reductive group. We construct functors of parabolic induction and restriction and show that they are exact and both ways adjoint to each other.
We say that $n$-vertex graphs $G_1,G_2,\ldots,G_k$pack if there exist injective mappings of their vertex sets onto $[n] = \{1, \ldots,n \}$ such that the images of the edge sets do not intersect. The notion of packing allows one to make some problems on graphs more natural or more general. Clearly, two $n$-vertex graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ pack if and only if $G_1$ is a subgraph of the complement $\overline{G}_2$ of $G_2$.
A convenient fact which was observed and then repeatedly used in the preceding lectures is that one can construct a family of noncommutative random variables with a prescribed joint distribution (where quite often the joint distribution is indicated in the guise of a prescribed joint R-transform). Sometimes there may be more than one way of doing such a construction; an example of such a situation is the one of free semicircular families, which can be obtained by an abstract free product construction, but can also be “concretely” put into evidence by using operators of creation and annihilation on the full Fock space (cf. Lecture 7).
Of course, all the different methods for constructing a family of elements with a prescribed joint distribution are ultimately equivalent, in the respect that the calculations with moments and with cumulants performed on the family give the same results, no matter how the family was constructed. Nevertheless, there can be a substantial difference in the transparency of the calculations – it may happen that the solution to the problem we are trying to solve shows up more easily if one method of construction is used over another.
So this is, in a nut-shell, the idea of “modeling”: find a good way of constructing a family of non-commutative random variables with a given joint distribution, so that we are at an advantage when computing moments and cumulants of that family.
In the final two lectures we want to treat one of the most important and inspiring realizations of free independence. Canonical examples for free random variables appeared in the context of group algebras of free products of groups and in the context of creation and annihilation operators on full Fock spaces. These are two (closely related) examples where the occurrence of free independence is not very surprising, because its definition was just modeled according to the situation on the group (or von Neumann) algebra of the free group.
But there are objects from a quite different mathematical universe which are also free (at least asymptotically), namely special random matrices. A priori, random matrices have nothing to do with free independence and this surprising connection is one of the key results in free probability theory. It establishes links between quite different fields.
We will present in this and the next lecture the fundamental results of Voiculescu on the asymptotic free independence of special random matrices. Our approach will be quite combinatorial and fits well with our combinatorial description of free independence. In a sense, we will show that the combinatorics of free probability theory arises as the limit N → ∞ of the combinatorics of the considered N × N random matrices.
Moments of Gaussian random variables
Random matrices are matrices whose entries are classical random variables, and the most important class of random matrices are the socalled Gaussian random matrices whose entries form a Gaussian family of classical random variables.
Our main concern in this lecture will be the understanding and effective description of the sum of freely independent random variables. How can we calculate the distribution of a + b if a and b are free and if we know the distribution of a and the distribution of b. Of particular interest is the case of selfadjoint random variables x and y in a C*-probability space. In this case their distributions can be identified with probability measures on ℝ and thus taking the sum of free random variables gives rise to a binary operation on probability measures on ℝ. We will call this operation “free convolution,” in analogy with the usual concept of convolution of probability measures which corresponds to taking the sum of classically independent random variables. Our combinatorial approach to free probability theory, resting on the notion of free cumulants, will give us very easy access to the main results of Voiculescu on this free convolution via the so-called “R-transform.”
Free convolution
Definition 12.1. Let μ and ν be probability measures on ℝ with compact support. Let x and y be selfadjoint random variables in some C*-probability space such that x has distribution μ, y has distribution ν, and such that x and y are freely independent. Then the distribution of the sum x + y is called the free convolution of μ and μ and is denoted by μ ⊞ ν.
The original use of the R-transform was in connection to the problem of describing the distribution of a sum of free random variables (via the formula Ra+b = Ra + Rb, which always holds when a is free from b in some non-commutative probability space – cf. Lectures 12 and 16). Similarly, the S-transform was introduced to solve the problem of multiplication of free random variables (cf. Lecture 18). By following these lines, it is natural to ask what happens when one considers the commutator ab−ba, or the anti-commutator ab+ba of two free elements. Some remarks about this have already been made in Lecture 15. In the present lecture we will continue the discussion started there, by using the convenient language of the operation of boxed convolution.
The problem of the free commutator can be treated on two levels, which will be discussed separately.
First there is a level where one considers even random variables. At this level the problem can be solved as an application of the results on R-diagonal elements. One comes to a formula which is at the same time valid for the anti-commutator (of two free, even random variables), and which was already presented in Theorem 15.20.
Then there is the general level, where the assumption that the random variables are even is dropped. Quite surprisingly, it turns out that the free commutator (unlike the free anti-commutator) is still described in this case by the same formula as we had in the even case.
Free probability theory is a quite recent theory, bringing together many different fields of mathematics, for example operator algebras, random matrices, combinatorics, or representation theory of symmetric groups. So it has a lot to offer to various mathematical communities, and interest in free probability has steadily increased in recent years.
However, this diversity of the field also has the consequence that it is considered hard to access for a beginner. Most of the literature on free probability consists of a mixture of operator algebraic and probabilistic notions and arguments, interwoven with random matrices and combinatorics.
Whereas more advanced operator algebraic or probabilistic expertise might indeed be necessary for a deeper appreciation of special applications in the respective fields, the basic core of the theory, however, can be mostly freed from this and it is possible to give a fairly elementary introduction to the main notions, ideas and problems of free probability theory. The present lectures are intended to provide such an introduction.
Our main emphasis will be on the combinatorial side of free probability. Even when stripped from analytical structure, the main features of free independence are still present; moreover, even on this more combinatorial level it is important to organize all relevant information about the considered variables in the right way. Anyone who has tried to perform computations of joint distributions for non-commuting variables will probably agree that they tend to be horribly messy if done in a naive way.