To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let C be a convex cone in ℛd with non-empty interior and a compact basis K. If H1 and H2 are any two parallel hyperplanes tangent to K, whose slices with C are two other compact basis K1 and K2, let D, D1 and D2 be the truncated subcones of C generated by K, K1 and K2. We prove that K is an ellipsoid if, and only if, vol (D)2 = vol (D1) vol (D2) for every such pair of hyperplanes H1, and H2.
We prove that in every finite dimensional normed space, for “most” pairs (x, y) of points in the unit ball, ║x − y║ is more than √2(1 − ε). As a consequence, we obtain a result proved by Bourgain, using QS-decomposition, that guarantees an exponentially large number of points in the unit ball any two of which are separated by more than √2(1 − ε).
We consider continuous time random walks on a product graph G×H, where G is arbitrary and H consists of two vertices x and y linked by an edge. For any t>0 and any a, b∈V(G), we show that the random walk starting at (a, x) is more likely to have hit (b, x) than (b, y) by time t. This contrasts with the discrete time case and proves a conjecture of Bollobás and Brightwell. We also generalize the result to cases where H is either a complete graph on n vertices or a cycle on n vertices.
For any integer k, we prove the existence of a uniquely k-colourable graph of girth at least g on at most k12(g+1) vertices whose maximal degree is at most 5k13. From this we deduce that, unless NP=RP, no polynomial time algorithm for k-Colourability on graphs G of girth g(G)[ges ]log[mid ]G[mid ]/13logk and maximum degree Δ(G)[les ]6k13 can exist. We also study several related problems.
We consider the function χ(Gk), defined to be the smallest number of colours that can colour a graph G in such a way that no vertices of distance at most k receive the same colour. In particular we shall look at how small a value this function can take in terms of the order and diameter of G. We get general bounds for this and tight bounds for the cases k=2 and k=3.
For any Boolean function f, let L(f) be its formula size complexity in the basis {∧, [oplus ] 1}. For every n and every k[les ]n/2, we describe a probabilistic distribution on formulas in the basis {∧, [oplus ] 1} in some given set of n variables and of size at most [lscr](k)=4k. Let pn,k(f) be the probability that the formula chosen from the distribution computes the function f. For every function f with L(f)[les ][lscr](k)α, where α=log4(3/2), we have pn,k(f)>0. Moreover, for every function f, if pn,k(f)>0, then
formula here
where c>1 is an absolute constant. Although the upper and lower bounds are exponentially small in [lscr](k), they are quasi-polynomially related whenever [lscr](k)[ges ]lnΩ(1)n. The construction is a step towards developing a model appropriate for investigation of the properties of a typical (random) Boolean function of some given complexity.
We prove that there exists n0, such that, for every n[ges ]n0 and every 2-colouring of the edges of the complete graph Kn, one can find two vertex-disjoint monochromatic cycles of different colours which cover all vertices of Kn.
To bound the probability of a union of n events from a single set of events, Bonferroni inequalities are sometimes used. There are sharper bounds which are called Sobel–Uppuluri–Galambos inequalities. When two (or more) sets of events are involved, bounds are considered on the probability of intersection of several such unions, one union from each set. We present a method for unified treatment of bivariate lower and upper bounds in this note. The lower bounds obtained are new and at least as good as lower bounds appearing in the literature so far. The upper bounds coincide with existing bivariate Sobel–Uppuluri–Galambos type upper bounds derived by the method of indicator functions. A numerical example is given to illustrate that the new lower bounds can be strictly better than existing ones.
Combinatorics played an important role in the development of probability theory and the two have continued to be closely related. Now probability theory, by offering new approaches to problems of discrete mathematics, is beginning to repay its debt to combinatorics. Among these new approaches, the methods of asymptotic analysis, which have been well developed in probability theory, can be used to solve certain complicated combinatorial problems.
If the uniform distribution is defined on the set of combinatorial structures in question, then the numerical characteristics of the structures can be regarded as random variables and analyzed by probabilistic methods. By using the probabilistic approach, we restrict our attention to “typical” structures that constitute the bulk of the set, excluding the small fraction with exceptional properties.
The probabilistic approach that is now widely used in combinatorics was first formulated by V. L. Goncharov, who applied it to Sn, the set of all permutations of degree n, and to the runs in random (0,1)-sequences. S. N. Bernstein, N. V. Smirnov, and V. E. Stepanov were among those who developed probabilistic combinatorics in Russia, building on the famous Russian school of probability founded by A. A. Markov, P. L. Lyapunov, A. Ya. Khinchin, and A. N. Kolmogorov.
This book is based on results obtained primarily by Russian mathematicians and presents results on random graphs, systems of random linear equations in GF(2), random permutations, and some simple equations involving permutations.
The probabilistic approach to enumerative combinatorial problems
The solution to enumerative combinatorial problems consists in finding an exact or approximate expression for the number of combinatorial objects possessing the property under investigation. In this book, the probabilistic approach to enumerative combinatorial problems is adopted.
The fundamental notion of probability theory is the probability space (Ω, A, P), where Ω, is a set of arbitrary elements, A is a set of subsets of Ω forming a σ-algebra of events with the operations of union and intersection of sets, and P is a nonnegative countably additive function defined for each event A ∈ A so that P(Ω) = 1. The set Ω is called the space of elementary events and P is a probability. A random variable is a real-valued measurable function ξ = ξ(ω) defined for all ω ∈ Ω.
Suppose Ω consists of finitely many elements. Then the probability P is defined on all subsets of Ω if it is defined for each elementary event ω ∈ Ω. In this case, any real-valued function ξ = ξ(ω) on such a space of elementary events is a random variable.
Instead of a real-valued function, one may consider a function f(ω) taking values from some set Y of arbitrary elements. Such a function f(ω) may be considered a generalization of a random variable and is called a random element of the set Y.
In studying combinatorial objects, we consider probability spaces that have a natural combinatorial interpretation: For the space of elementary events Ω, we take the set of combinatorial objects under investigation and assign the same probability to all the elements of the set.
Given a sequence of nonnegative real numbers λ0, λ1, … that sum to 1, we consider a random graph having approximately λin vertices of degree i. In [12] the authors essentially show that if [sum ]i(i−2)λi>0 then the graph a.s. has a giant component, while if [sum ]i(i−2)λi<0 then a.s. all components in the graph are small. In this paper we analyse the size of the giant component in the former case, and the structure of the graph formed by deleting that component. We determine ε, λ′0, λ′1 … such that a.s. the giant component, C, has εn+o(n) vertices, and the structure of the graph remaining after deleting C is basically that of a random graph with n′=n−[mid ]C[mid ] vertices, and with λ′in′ of them of degree i.