Extreme events (e.g. floods and disease outbreaks) can overwhelm healthcare workers (HCWs) and healthcare systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, high levels of distress and mental ill health were reported by HCWs.

To examine and synthesise research findings reported in the qualitative literature regarding the stressors, and their psychosocial impacts, faced by HCWs in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to provide lessons for future support.

Qualitative articles were identified in EMBASE and OVID (preregistered on PROSPERO: CRD42022304235). Studies were required to have been published between January 2021 and January 2022 and to have examined the impact of COVID-19 on UK HCWs. We included 27 articles that represented the experiences of 2640 HCWs, assessed their quality using National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criteria and integrated their findings using thematic synthesis.

Several secondary stressors were identified, including lack of personal protective equipment, ineffective leadership and communication, high workloads and problems stemming from uncertainty and a lack of knowledge. Stressors were related to adverse psychosocial outcomes including worry, fatigue, lack of confidence in oneself and senior managers, impacts on teamwork and feeling unappreciated or that one’s needs are not recognised.

Our thematic synthesis moves beyond simply mapping stressors faced by HCWs by considering their antecedents, origins and psychosocial impacts. Utilising a theoretical framework that points towards systemic deficiencies, we argue that secondary stressors can be modified to remove their negative effects. Consequently, workforce planning should shift from focusing on individual change towards amending psychosocial environments in which HCWs work.

User engagement is recognised as a critical and pervasive challenge that has limited the potential evidence base being developed for mental health apps.

To understand young people’s motivations for participating in a randomised controlled trial for a mental health app and the role of intrinsic (e.g. improving well-being) and extrinsic (e.g. financial incentives) drivers in engagement.

Emotional Competence for Well-Being (ECoWeB) was a superiority parallel three-arm randomised cohort trial recruiting a cohort of 16–22 year-olds across the UK, Germany, Spain and Belgium, who, depending on risk, were allocated respectively to the PREVENT (n = 1262) versus PROMOTE (n = 2532) trials. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews in the UK (n = 18, mean age = 17.7, s.d. = 1.5) and Spain (n = 11, mean age 20.6, s.d. = 1.7) to explore participants’ self-reported motivations and engagement. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04148508.

Across arms, 21% of participants never set up an account to access the app and approximately 50% did not complete the 3-month follow-up assessment. Engagement was not significantly higher in the intervention arm compared to the control arms across metrics. Qualitative findings demonstrated that although extrinsic factors alone may be enough to prompt someone to sign up to research, intrinsic drivers (e.g. finding the app useful) are needed to ensure longer-term engagement.

Incentivising participation in clinical trials needs to be consistent with incentives that might be utilised at the point of dissemination and implementation to ensure that findings are replicated if that intervention is adopted at scale.

Physical health checks in primary care for people with severe mental illness ((SMI) defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and non-organic psychosis) aim to reduce health inequalities. Patients who decline or are deemed unsuitable for screening are removed from the denominator used to calculate incentivisation, termed exception reporting.

To describe the prevalence of, and patient characteristics associated with, exception reporting in patients with SMI.

We identified adult patients with SMI from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), registered with a general practice between 2004 and 2018. We calculated the annual prevalence of exception reporting and investigated patient characteristics associated with exception reporting, using logistic regression.

Of 193 850 patients with SMI, 27.7% were exception reported from physical health checks at least once. Exception reporting owing to non-response or declining screening increased over the study period. Patients of Asian or Black ethnicity (Asian: odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80; Black: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.76–0.97; compared with White) and women (odds ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.92) had a reduced odds of being exception reported, whereas patients diagnosed with ‘other psychoses’ (odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.15–1.23; compared with bipolar disorder) had increased odds. Younger patients and those diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to be exception reported owing to informed dissent.

Exception reporting was common in people with SMI. Interventions are required to improve accessibility and uptake of physical health checks to improve physical health in people with SMI.

Patients with psychosis face an elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality and are more likely to disengage from care. While antipsychotics are essential for treatment, they further increase this risk. Despite this, Ghana lacks a national policy for monitoring cardiovascular risk factors in individuals on antipsychotics.

To evaluate disengagement in care and weight changes among newly diagnosed psychotic patients at Accra Psychiatric Hospital, and to inform clinical practice.

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for patients newly diagnosed with non-affective psychotic disorders between June 2022 and May 2023. Patients were reviewed for 6 months, with assessments at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Outcomes included antipsychotic prescription patterns, dropout rates, cardiovascular disease monitoring and weight changes. Descriptive statistics, multinomial logistic regression and linear mixed-effects models were used for analysis.

The number of patients disengaged from care within the first month was 53.1%, and within 6 months 75.5%; 62.8% received olanzapine at baseline. Weight gain was exponential, with 40% experiencing clinically significant weight gain at 3 months, increasing to 58% at 6 months. Less than 50% of patients had their blood sugar and lipid profiles checked before starting antipsychotics. Higher baseline weight was associated with increased weight over time (β = 0.96, t = 80, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.93, 0.98).

High disengagement rates, low cardiovascular disease monitoring and exponential weight gain were observed. Targeted interventions, robust monitoring protocols and further research are needed to improve patient outcomes.