To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 1 offers a précis of the feste di ballo in Naples from the ascension of Carlo di Borbone in 1734 to the long reign of his son Ferdinando IV, whose Austrian consort, Maria Carolina, remained a significant patron in local artistic life. It considers the Neapolitan milieu against the backdrop of the wider European diffusion and patronage of social dance, especially in Paris (Carlo’s great-grandfather was Louis XIV), Milan, and Rome. The contemporary letters of Alessandro and Pietro Verri provide firsthand insights into the existence of similar feste di ballo, and their influence and social resonance in these cosmopolitan cities. The deep interest of Ferdinando and Maria Carolina from the very beginning of their reign in the second half of the eighteenth century encouraged their active engagement in the programming of feste di ballo. Their well-known passion for social dancing extended from the direct planning thereof to taking center stage in the public performance of the minuet and contradance, as well as requiring the study of dance for their children. These circumstances were meticulously documented in the contemporary periodicals Gazzetta Universale and Notizie del Mondo, and in the personal correspondence and diaries discussed here.
Chapter 4 focuses on treatises by Giambattista Dufort, Il Trattato del Ballo Nobile (1728), and Gennaro Magri, Trattato teorico-prattico di ballo (1779). Given the intentionally didactic nature of Dufort’s treatise and its concentration on the minuet, the presentation of the fundamentals, mechanics of the genre, and how to execute the mandatory steps are the primary points for discussion. Magri’s later treatise is a much broader reflection on the contemporary dance environment of Naples (including ample reference to the pantomime and grottesco traditions), and it mirrors the preference for the contradance that emerged in the latter part of the century. Accordingly, Magri concentrates on this more intricate social dance, not only providing the reader with detailed explanations of its content but also devising specific graphic notation paired to original music. This approach provides unprecedented insight into contemporary social dancing and its place within the aristocratic culture of Naples. Given Magri’s career as a primo ballerino in the grottesco tradition, the narrative references ongoing polemics with Charles LePicq (student of Noverre and principal exponent of pantomime style). Finally, Magri’s role at the royal festivities in the capital city and in Caserta is considered.
The sixth chapter covers a broader expanse of time, yet provides equally detailed descriptions of the feste, as the tradition returned to the Teatro di San Carlo in 1774. Responding to criticisms of both Carlo di Borbone (now king of Spain) and the Neapolitan Secretary of State Bernardo Tanucci (who provided the Spanish sovereign with detailed complaints about the lifestyles of his son and consort), the feste di ballo returned to the capital city and the royal theater. In the period 1774–86, the feste take on greater significance, not only as an instrumentum regni projecting positive images of sovereignty, but also as a financial bulwark against the significant losses incurred in virtually every opera season (meticulously detailed in memoranda contained in the fondo Archivio Farnesiano). Surviving financial documents, personnel rosters, and ledgers provide important details about the annual feste, ranging from fundamental questions about the physical transformation of the theater into a dance space to the retention of key artistic and managerial personnel. These sources relate closely to and often confirm many of the observations found in the historical accounts of Sara Goudar and Magri’s treatise Trattato teorico-prattico di ballo (1779), among others.
The introduction offers a brief overview of dance traditions in Naples, noting the principal venue (Teatro di San Carlo) practitioners (Charles LePicq and Gennaro Magri), and genres: ballet d’action, grottesco, and social forms.
Chapter 2 returns to the early eighteenth century and the impact of Carlo di Borbone’s urban renewal of the capital city. Among the most significant initiatives were the renovation and expansion of the Palazzo Reale and the construction of the eponymous Teatro di San Carlo. Although unprecedented achievements by the Crown, they were not singular, and these structures were complemented by a constellation of siti reali (royal residences) within and along the periphery of Naples, including the imperial palaces of Caserta, Capodimonte, and Portici. The book explores the architectural parameters and inclusion of dance spaces within each sito reale, bolstered by contemporary documents, whether architectural or the inclusion of accounts detailing specific events, and it includes detailed consideration of court etiquette and associated protocols regarding the feste di ballo based on archival sources. The chapter concludes by placing attention on the resonance of social dance within the larger aristocratic community of Naples, in particular, the decision of the Accademia de’ Nobili Cavalieri, who counted Ferdinando and Maria Carolina as primary patrons and members, to program feste di ballo in its private palazzo in the latter part of the century.
Chapter 7 considers the music created for the feste di ballo. The Library of the Conservatory of Naples contains an extensive selection of eighteenth-century dance music with a clear emphasis on the minuet and contradance. Several compilations can be directly associated with specific years and members of the local musical establishment. For example, a manuscript anthology (shelf mark Od.3.10) bears the inscription “Minuetti composed for the feste of the royal palace,” positing its use for events organized in the associated dance space. It bears the name of Antonio Montoro and the date 1776, alongside a handwritten annotation citing Giovanni Battista Bergantino as an author of additional selections. Both Montoro and Bergantino had long associations as violinists with the orchestra of the Teatro di San Carlo (de facto band for the feste di ballo) and as composers of the dances for such events. Another contemporary source is a compendium of printed dance tunes by composers both local (including Luigi Marescalchi, the royal printer) and foreign (including Joseph Haydn, a favorite of the Neapolitan sovereigns). These collections provide an intimate guide to the practicalities of the feste di ballo tradition, namely a direct understanding of the music preferred and performed therein.
Chapter 3 focuses on the early feste di ballo organized by Carlo di Borbone, specifically in 1737 and 1747. The former represented his first forays into a public projection of himself as the sovereign as well as related social and political iconography of the newly established kingdom. Supported by a heretofore little-examined anonymous account of the festivities from 1737, this book derives considerable insight into the nascent social and artistic protocols established by Carlo for the feste di ballo. In contrast, the feste di ballo of 1747 were a fundamental pillar of extensive celebrations marking the birth of the Neapolitan heir. These events were thoroughly documented in contemporary sources, including architectural and scenographic engravings as well as detailed accounts of each festa in related materials. Through the examination of correlative and newly uncovered archival sources from the Archivio di Stato di Napoli (located in the fondi Regia Camera della Sommaria and Casa Reale Antica), an understanding of the musical ensembles, and their specific personnel and makeup can be determined with precision.
The first extended overview of the life, times, and music of Michael Mosoeu Moerane (1904-1980) that explores the political changes and social conditions of the African choral composer's life. Lucia describes his ancestry, upbringing, education and teaching career and analyses his symphonic poem and four choral pieces.
The Times Do Not Permit is the first extended overview of the life, times, and music of Michael Mosoeu Moerane (1904-1980), an African composer brought up in rural South Africa in the early twentieth century, one of many mission-trained musicians who wrote short a cappella choral works for churches and schools.
It explores the political changes and social conditions that made life for Moerane both possible and impossible as a composer. He was the first black South African to qualify with a BMus degree in 1941. However, this caused difficulties for him both within the African choral circuit, where his advanced modernist style was considered strange and difficult, and within white concert life, from which he was largely excluded.
Lucia describes his ancestry, upbringing, education and teaching career, and offers an analysis of his music: his famous symphonic poem, 'Fatšo La Heso', and four of his choral pieces, grouped to reflect the major themes he expressed. The Times Do Not Permit is supplemented with interviews with those who knew Moerane and ends with a coda of professional letters to, from, and about him that gives his voice a presence in the absence of much personal documentation.
In the words of Eric Lewis, “approaching Afrological musics from the theoretical perspective of a Western aesthetic…yields not only a lack of understanding…but can have pernicious political and social results.” In this paper, I demonstrate the relevance of this statement to the British Music classroom. In Part One, I outline the current state of the UK’s Model Music Curriculum and seek to identify its underlying ideology. Part Two offers a survey of how the universal understanding of music as a series of autonomous products generates a prescribed set of criteria for musical evaluation. By ascribing idiosyncratically European notions to our evaluation of music on a universal scale, we are left with an incomplete understanding and appreciation of music not conceived according to this ideology. Looking to the future, Part Three suggests how we might approach music in a fair and germane way via a transfer of emphasis from the musical product to the people involved in the musical process. I name this an outside-in approach to music, and consider it a universally applicable and fruitful mode of musical analysis—people are, after all, the common denominator for music-making. By beginning with the social and cultural conditions in which musicians create, students are equipped with a multiplicity of lenses through which they can better appreciate the value and beauty of musical cultures both near and far.
Leonard Feather (1914−1994) was one of the first (and only) prominent jazz critics to recognize gender discrimination within jazz and attempt to redress the issue. But even by the 1950s, Feather grew frustrated with his inability to effect meaningful change for women musicians. He could not understand why women like Beryl Booker, Melba Liston, Vi Redd, and others did not receive more attention, even after he arranged tours and produced record dates for them (Feather 1987). The privileged position he held within the music industry—a position he had cultivated and leveraged in support of other musicians he felt had been unfairly discriminated against—ultimately seemed to do little for many of the women he championed. Women jazz masters remain few and far between.
What does it mean to be a jazz master, and who determines modes of mastery? In this article, I examine some of the musicians for whom he advocated and how he advocated for them, including columns he authored, albums he produced, and Blindfold Tests he administered. To conclude, I follow Feather into the 1990s to examine how he dealt with who was to blame for jazz’s gender discrimination. In doing so, I reveal how jazz patriarchy maintained dominance over one of jazz’s most prominent decision-makers. I demonstrate how, despite his intentions, Feather’s embeddedness and investment in jazz patriarchy (in its ideological and commercial systems) resulted in a gender ignorant failure to critique the systems of mastery at the root of his connoisseurship.
Renowned as a city of entertainment, Naples was unequaled in eighteenth-century Italy for the diversity of its musical life. During the reigns of Carlo di Borbone and his heir Ferdinando IV, the sponsorship of feste di ballo, elaborate celebratory balls featuring social dance such as the minuet and contradance, grew increasingly lavish. Organized for carnevale, occasions of state, and personal celebrations in the lives of the royal family, the feste di ballo fostered both a public agenda and a personal rapport between the monarchs and local aristocracy. As the century progressed, the frequency of and resources accorded to the feste di ballo and its showcasing of social dance came to match those of stage drama and instrumental music. Based on extensive archival research, this book reveals the culture of social dance at the Bourbon court and how these spectacular events served to project images of authority, power, and identity.