Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:16:46.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond reduction with the representation: The need for causality with full complexity to unravel mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Martin Desseilles  and
Christophe Phillips
Martin Desseilles
Affiliation:
GIGA Cyclotron Research Centre (CRC) in vivo imaging, University of Liege, Liège B-4000, Belgium. Department of Psychology, University of Namur, Namur B-5000, Belgium. martin.desseilles@unamur.behttp://mentalhealthsciences.com/index_en.html Clinique Psychiatrique des Frères Alexiens, Henri-Chapelle B-4841, Belgium Transition Institute, University of Namur, Namur B-5000, Belgium
Christophe Phillips
Affiliation:
GIGA Cyclotron Research Centre (CRC) in vivo imaging, University of Liege, Liège B-4000, Belgium. GIGA in silico medicine, University of Liege, Liege B-4000, Belgium. c.phillips@uliege.behttp://www.giga.uliege.be/cms/c_17732/en/home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary on Borsboom et al.’s target article, we argue that researchers should be aware of the historical development of models in neuroscience. Considering the importance of causality in anatomo-clinical approach and stressing the complexity of mental phenomenon, we provide new insight on reductionism and representation limitation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e6
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbara, J.-G. (2008) L'adaptation biologique et les neurosciences [Biological adaptation and neuroscience]. Paper presented at the REHSEIS Conference on Adaptations, UPMC, Université Diderot, REHSEIS, CNRS UMR7596, Paris, October 21, 2008 (journée «Adaptations», journée de rentrée du REHSEIS, organisée par J. G. Barbara, C. Lefève, G. Gachelin, 21 octobre 2008, Université Diderot, CNRS UMR7596). Available at: http://www.rehseis.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article313; and at : http://www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/chn/docpdf/adaptation.pdf.Google Scholar
Collignon, O., Dormal, G., Albouy, G., Vandewalle, G., Voss, P., Phillips, C. & Lepore, F. (2013) Impact of blindness onset on the functional organization and the connectivity of the occipital cortex. Brain 136(Part 9):2769–83.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2007) Les neurones de la lecture. Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
de Ricqlès, A. (2015) Adaptation: Adaptation biologique. In: Dans Encyclopedia Universalis. (Online publication). Available at: http://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/adaptation-adaptation-biologique/.Google Scholar
Desseilles, M. & Phillips, C. (2016) How cognition affects perception: Brain activity modelling to unravel top-down dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e238. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15002757.Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(2):127–38. doi:10.1038/nrn2787.Google Scholar
Juignet, P. (2015) Edgar Morin et la complexité [Edgar Morin and complexity]. Philosophie, Science et Société. (Online publication). Available at: https://philosciences.com/philosophie-generale/complexite-systeme-organisation-emergence/17-edgar-morin-complexite.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (2005) Introduction à la pensée complexe. Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1864–1867) Adaptation. In: The principles of biology, vol. 1, Part II, Ch. V, p. 184-200. Williams and Norgate. [Book available in pdf at: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k779237/f2.image.r=The%20principles%20of%20biology]Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.Google Scholar