Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T14:20:11.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neither biological nor symptomatology reductionism: A call for integration in psychopathology research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Benjamin C. Nephew
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01605. bcnephew@aol.comhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Nephe Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655
Marcelo Febo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610. febo@ufl.eduhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcelo_Febo
Hudson P Santos Jr.
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. hsantos@unc.eduhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hudson_Santos_Jr

Abstract

We agree with Borsboom et al. in challenging neurobiological reductionism, and underscore some specific strengths of a network approach. However, they do not acknowledge that a similar problem is present in current psychosocial frameworks. We discuss this challenge as well as describe valuable parallels between symptom and neurobiological network theories that will substantially augment psychopathological research when integrated.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable