Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T01:18:54.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of clinical and translational neuroscience approaches to psychiatric illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Juyoen Hur
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. jhur1@umd.edurmtillma@umd.edu
Rachael M. Tillman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. jhur1@umd.edurmtillma@umd.edu
Andrew S. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. dfox@ucdavis.eduhttp://foxlab.ucdavis.edu California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Alexander J. Shackman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. jhur1@umd.edurmtillma@umd.edu Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. shackman@umd.eduhttp://shackmanlab.org1

Abstract

Borsboom et al. confuse biological approaches with extreme biological reductionism and common-cause models of psychopathology. In muddling these concepts, they mistakenly throw the baby out with the bathwater. Here, we highlight recent work underscoring the unique value of clinical and translational neuroscience approaches for understanding the nature and origins of psychopathology and for developing improved intervention strategies.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable