Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T18:14:38.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

John Drury
John Drury*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, School of Psychology, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom. j.drury@sussex.ac.uk http://drury.socialpsychology.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In line with Dixon et al.'s argument, I contend that prejudice should be understood in broadly political rather than in narrowly psychological terms. First, what counts as prejudice is a political judgement. Second, studies of collective action demonstrate that it is in “political” struggles, where subordinate groups together oppose dominant groups, that prejudice can be overcome.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 430 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Coulter, J., Miller, S. & Walker, M. (1984) State of siege: Politics and policing of the coalfields: The miners' strike 1984. Canary.Google Scholar
Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2000) Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology 39:579–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2005) Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology 35:35–58.Google Scholar
Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2009) Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues 65: 707–25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Reicher, S. & Stott, C. (2003) Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: From the “local” anti-road campaign to “global” resistance? Social Movement Studies 2:191–212. DOI: 10.1080/1474283032000139779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. (1990) The enemy without: Policing and class consciousness in the miners' strike. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, R. (1989) Racism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. & Turner, J. C. (1994) Stereotyping and social reality. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Piven, F. F. & Cloward, R. A. (1977) Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Vintage.Google Scholar
Salt, C. & Layzell, J. (1985) Here we go! Women's memories of the 1984/85 miners' strike. Co-operative Retail Services.Google Scholar
Scarman, L. (1981) The Brixton disorders, 10–12 April, 1981: Report of an inquiry by the Rt. Hon. The Lord Scarman, O.B.E. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Stott, C., Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2012) From prejudice to collective action. In: Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change, ed. Dixon, J. & Levine, M., pp. 286–303, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: The social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S., pp. 33–47. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar