Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2012
Dixon et al. have highlighted the importance of a political conceptualisation of intergroup relations that challenges individualising models of social change. As important as this paper is for the development of critical debates in psychology, we can detect at least three issues that warrant further discussion: (a) the cultural and historical conditions of structural inequality and its perception, (b) the marginalisation of post-colonial works on collective mobilisation, and (c) acknowledging the complex perspectives and politics of those targeted by prejudice.
Target article
Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
Related commentaries (13)
Are attitudes the problem, and do psychologists have the answer? Relational cognition underlies intergroup relations
Beyond prejudice to prejudices
From extreme emotions to extreme actions: Explaining non-normative collective action and reconciliation
Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists
Prejudice and personality: A role for positive-approach processes?
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective
Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?
Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry
The dangers of prejudice reduction interventions: Empirical evidence from encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel
The dominance of the individual in intergroup relations research: Understanding social change requires psychological theories of collective and structural phenomena
The politics of moving beyond prejudice
Understanding the psychological processes involved in the demobilizing effects of positive cross-group contact
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer
Author response
Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited