Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2012
We disagree with Dixon et al. by maintaining that prejudice is primarily rooted in aversive reactions toward out-group members. However, these reactions are not indicative of negative attributes, such as trait bigotry, but rather normative homophily for peers with similar perceived attributes. Cognitive biases such as stereotype threat perpetuate perceptions of inequipotential and subsequent discrimination, irrespective of individuals' personality characteristics.
Target article
Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
Related commentaries (13)
Are attitudes the problem, and do psychologists have the answer? Relational cognition underlies intergroup relations
Beyond prejudice to prejudices
From extreme emotions to extreme actions: Explaining non-normative collective action and reconciliation
Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists
Prejudice and personality: A role for positive-approach processes?
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective
Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?
Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry
The dangers of prejudice reduction interventions: Empirical evidence from encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel
The dominance of the individual in intergroup relations research: Understanding social change requires psychological theories of collective and structural phenomena
The politics of moving beyond prejudice
Understanding the psychological processes involved in the demobilizing effects of positive cross-group contact
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer
Author response
Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited