Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T14:19:35.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abstraction: An alternative neurocognitive account of recognition, prediction, and decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Valerie F. Reyna
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853 vr53@cornell.edu https://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/research/labs/lrdm/publications
David A. Broniatowski
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC20052. broniatowski@gwu.edu https://www2.seas.gwu.edu/~broniatowski/index.html

Abstract

Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable