Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T16:49:25.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slowing life history (K) can account for increasing micro-innovation rates and GDP growth, but not macro-innovation rates, which declined following the end of the Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2019

Michael A. Woodley of Menie
Affiliation:
Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1160 Brussels, BelgiumMichael.Woodley@vub.ac.behttps://www.vub.be/CLEA/cgi-bin/homepage.cgi?email=michael.woodley03%5bat%5dgmail.com Unz Foundation Junior Fellow, Palo Alto, CA 94301
Aurelio José Figueredo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721ajf@u.arizona.eduhttps://psychology.arizona.edu/users/aurelio-figueredo
Matthew A. Sarraf
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher.mas626@cornell.edu

Abstract

Baumard proposes that life history slowing in populations over time is the principal driver of innovation rates. We show that this is only true of micro-innovation rates, which reflect cognitive and economic specialization as an adaptation to high population density, and not macro-innovation rates, which relate more to a population's level of general intelligence.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable