Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T22:52:02.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural interconnectedness and in-group cooperation as sources of innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2019

Natalia B. Dutra Open the ORCID record for Natalia B. Dutra [Opens in a new window]
Natalia B. Dutra*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Evolução do Comportamento Humano, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, 59064-741, Brazil. nbdutra@gmail.comnataliadutra.strikingly.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that the increased rate of innovation in eighteenth-century England cannot be understood without accounting for the unprecedented level of contact between England and other societies as a consequence of sixteenth-century colonialism. I propose cultural interconnectedness and in-group cooperation as two potential alternative explanations for the psychological changes and innovative behavior described by Baumard.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e198
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Derex, M. & Boyd, R. (2015) The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nature Communications 6(1):Article 8398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9398.Google Scholar
Derex, M. & Boyd, R. (2016) Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113(11):2982–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518798113.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (2000) The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations, revised edition. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Francois, P., Fujiwara, T. & van Ypersele, T. (2018) The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and the laboratory. Science Advances 4(9):eaat2201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2201.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2009) The evolution of innovation-enhancing institutions. In: Innovation in cultural systems: Contributions in evolution anthropology, ed. Shennan, S. J. & O'Brien, M. J.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2013) The British Empire: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwaba, T., Luhmann, M., Denissen, J. J. A., Chung, J. M. & Bleidorn, W. (2018) Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 115(1):118–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp000015.0Google Scholar
Sol, D., Sayol, F., Ducatez, S. & Lefebvre, L. (2016) The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1690):20150187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0187.Google Scholar