Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T22:34:32.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

All that glitters is not gold: The false-symbol problem in archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Claudio Tennie Open the ORCID record for Claudio Tennie [Opens in a new window]  and
Ronald J. Planer
Claudio Tennie*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Working Group Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany claudio.tennie@uni-tuebingen.de https://sites.google.com/view/claudiotennie
Ronald J. Planer
Affiliation:
School of Liberal Arts, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia rplaner@uow.edu.au https://scholars.uow.edu.au/ronald-planer
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stibbard-Hawkes forcefully alerts us to the pitfall of false-negative reasoning in symbolic archaeology. We highlight the twin problem of false-positive reasoning in what we call the “false-symbol problem.” False symbols are intuitively special entities that, owing to their non-utilitarian nature, invite symbolic interpretation. But they are not symbolic. We link the false-symbol problem to work in comparative primate cognition, taking “primate art” as our main example.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e18
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fuentes, A., Kissel, M., Spikins, P., Molopyane, K., Hawks, J., & Berger, L. R. (2023). Burials and engravings in a small-brained hominin, Homo naledi, from the late Pleistocene: Contexts and evolutionary implications. eLife, 12, RP89125. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89125.1Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2013). Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature, 24, 219–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reindl, E., Beck, S. R., Apperly, I. A., & Tennie, C. (2016). Young children spontaneously invent wild great apes’ tool-use behaviors. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, 1825.Google Scholar
Tennie, C. (2023). The earliest tools and cultures of hominins. In Tehrani, J. J., Kendal, J. & Kendal, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of cultural evolution, awaiting print. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tennie, C., Braun, D. R., Premo, L. S., & McPherron, S. P. (2016). The Island Test for cumulative culture in Paleolithic cultures. In Haidle, M. N., Conard, N. J. & Bolus, M. (Eds.), The nature of culture. Series: Vertebrate paleobiology and paleoanthropology (pp. 121–133). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Premo, L. S., Braun, D. R., & McPherron, S. P. (2017). Resetting the null hypothesis: Early stone tools and cultural transmission. Current Anthropology, 58, 652–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, G. C., & Suomi, S. J. (1997). Modification of clay forms by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). International Journal of Primatology, 18, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar