Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-57z57 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T11:44:06.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proposing the DN(C)-model of material evidence for well-calibrated claims about past cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

David J. Grüning*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany david.gruening@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de Department of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
Lukas J. Grüning
Affiliation:
Winckelmann Institute, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany lukas.jan.gruening@student.hu-berlin.de
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Stibbard-Hawkes presents a much-needed case for distinguishing between different types of evidence for cognition in past cultures. However, he does not outline an applicable approach for moving forward in making claims about the cognition of past cultures. We present an initial model for calibrating both absolute and comparative claims about past cultures' cognition and other traits.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable