Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T09:35:01.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evolution of (intergroup) peace hinges on how we define groups and peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

Anne C. Pisor*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA anne.pisor@wsu.edu kristopher.m.smith@wsu.edu https://www.kristophermsmith.com/ Department of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Kristopher M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA anne.pisor@wsu.edu kristopher.m.smith@wsu.edu https://www.kristophermsmith.com/
Jeffrey P. Deminchuk
Affiliation:
School of Politics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA jeffrey.deminchuk@wsu.edu https://socialitylab.org
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Glowacki defines peace as harmonious relationships between groups maintained without the threat of violence, where groups can be anything from families to nation states. However, defining such contentious concepts like “peace” and “groups” is a difficult task, and we discuss the implications of Glowacki's definitions for understanding intergroup relationships and their evolutionary history.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable