Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T03:01:05.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental evidence suggests intergroup relations are, by default, neutral rather than aggressive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

Hirotaka Imada
Affiliation:
School of Economics & Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi City, Kochi, Japan himada2022@gmail.com n.mifune@gmail.com; https://www.kochi-tech.ac.jp/profile/en/mifune-nobuhiro.html
Nobuhiro Mifune*
Affiliation:
School of Economics & Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi City, Kochi, Japan himada2022@gmail.com n.mifune@gmail.com; https://www.kochi-tech.ac.jp/profile/en/mifune-nobuhiro.html
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

The target article offers a game-theoretical analysis of primitive intergroup aggression (i.e., raiding) and discusses difficulties in achieving peace. We argue the analysis does not capture the actual strategy space, missing out “do-nothing.” Experimental evidence robustly shows people prefer doing nothing against out-group members over cooperating with/attacking them. Thus, the target article overestimates the likelihood of intergroup aggression.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable