Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T01:48:34.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The science of consciousness must include its more advanced forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

Andrew Vonasch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32305-4301 vonasch@psy.fsu.edu baumeister@psy.fsu.edu https://psy.fsu.edu/~baumeisterticelab/vonasch.html http://www.psy.fsu.edu/faculty/baumeister.dp.html
E. J. Masicampo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109. masicaej@wfu.edu http://college.wfu.edu/psychology/about-the-department/faculty-and-staff/e-j-masicampo/
Roy F. Baumeister
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32305-4301 vonasch@psy.fsu.edu baumeister@psy.fsu.edu https://psy.fsu.edu/~baumeisterticelab/vonasch.html http://www.psy.fsu.edu/faculty/baumeister.dp.html

Abstract

Morsella et al. argue that science should not focus on high forms of consciousness. We disagree. An understanding of high forms of consciousness is invaluable to the scientific study of consciousness. Moreover, it poses challenges to the passive frame theory. Specifically, it challenges the notions that conscious thoughts are not connected and that consciousness serves skeletomotor conflict only.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable