Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T21:27:08.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compensation in autism is not consistent with social motivation theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Lucy Anne Livingston
Affiliation:
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom. lucy.livingston@kcl.ac.ukfrancesca.happe@kcl.ac.uk
Punit Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom. p.shah@bath.ac.ukwww.punitqshah.com
Francesca Happé
Affiliation:
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom. lucy.livingston@kcl.ac.ukfrancesca.happe@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

Growing evidence, as presented by Jaswal & Akhtar, indicates that social motivation is not universally reduced in autism. Here, we evaluate and extend this argument in light of recent evidence of “compensation” in autism. We thereby argue that autistic “compensators” – exhibiting neurotypical behaviour despite persistent difficulties in social cognition – indicate intact or potentially heightened social motivation in autism.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable