Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T04:08:03.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computation, perception, and mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2022

Jerome A. Feldman Open the ORCID record for Jerome A. Feldman [Opens in a new window]
Jerome A. Feldman*
Affiliation:
ICSI and University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA94704, USA. Feldman@icsi.berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advances in behavioral and brain sciences have engendered wide ranging efforts to help understand consciousness. The target article suggests that abstract computational models (such as integrated information theory [IIT]) are ill-advised. This commentary broadens the discussion to include mysteries of subjective experience that are inconsistent with current neuroscience. It also discusses progress being made through demystifying specific cases and pursuing evolutionary considerations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e48
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkenius, A., & Kelber, A. (2004). Colour constancy in diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207, 3307–3316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobb, M. (2020). The idea of the brain: A history. Profile.Google Scholar
D'Anna, E., Valle, G., Mazzoni, A., Strauss, I., Iberite, F., Patton, J., … Micera, S. (2019). A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Science Robotics, 4, eaau8892.Google ScholarPubMed
Feldman, J. (2012). Mysteries of visual experience. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08612Google Scholar
Feldman, J. (2020) On the Evolution of Subjective Experience. http//arXiv.org/abs/2008.08073Google Scholar
Fox, D., Goodale, M. A., & Bourne, J. A. (2020). The age-dependent neural substrates of blindsight. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(4), 242–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesse, J., & Tsao, D. Y. (2020). The macaque face patch system: A turtle's underbelly for the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(12), 695–716. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-00393-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iriki, A., … (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7(14), 2325–2330.Google ScholarPubMed
Iriki, A., & Taoka, M. (2012). Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: A scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool use and language from the control of reaching actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 10–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melloni, L., … (2021). Making the hard problem of consciousness easier. Science (New York, N.Y.), 372(6545), 911–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merker, B. (2007). Consciousness without cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 63–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pazzaglia, M. (Ed.) (2020). Embodying tool use: From cognition to neurorehabilitation. Frontiers Research Topic. Published on 11 February 2020. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar