Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- 7 Review of Methods Used in Global Work and Family Research
- 8 Meta-Analysis as a Tool to Synthesize Global Work–Family Research Findings
- 9 Conducting Qualitative Work–Family Research across Cultures
- 10 Leveraging Archival Data in Global Work–Family Research: The Case of Time Use Data
- 11 Best Practices in Scale Translation and Establishing Measurement Equivalence
- 12 Getting the Global Band Together: Best Practices in Organizing and Managing International Research Teams
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
12 - Getting the Global Band Together: Best Practices in Organizing and Managing International Research Teams
from Part III - Methodological Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- 7 Review of Methods Used in Global Work and Family Research
- 8 Meta-Analysis as a Tool to Synthesize Global Work–Family Research Findings
- 9 Conducting Qualitative Work–Family Research across Cultures
- 10 Leveraging Archival Data in Global Work–Family Research: The Case of Time Use Data
- 11 Best Practices in Scale Translation and Establishing Measurement Equivalence
- 12 Getting the Global Band Together: Best Practices in Organizing and Managing International Research Teams
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Based on their experience with organizing multinational work-family (and other) studies involving teams of researchers from as many as 30 countries, the authors discuss nine important issues involved in conducting such studies. Suggested are procedures for 1) defining the scope of the study; 2) assembling the international team; 3) developing written agreements over data dissemination and publication; 4) managing the project; 5) selecting a base language for instrument development and project communication; 6) data collection and management; 7) data processing; 8) dealing with potential political and societal issues, and 9) publishing results. The issues are illustrated by the Collaborative International Study of Managerial Stress (CISMS) in which the authors were part of the organizing team. Successfully conducting large-scale multinational projects is challenging because of differences in language and location, making preplanning and developing detailed policies and procedures important.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 230 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., Poelmans, S. A., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., … Woo, J.-M. (2014). The link between national paid leave policy and work–family conflict among married working parents. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(1), 5–28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apps.12004Google Scholar
Bernin, P., Theorell, T., Cooper, C. L., Sparks, K., Spector, P. E., Radhakrishnan, P., & Russinova, V. (2003). Coping strategies among Swedish female and male managers in an international context. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(4), 376–391. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.376Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1994). Values Survey Module 1994 Manual. Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Limburg.Google Scholar
Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L., O’Driscoll, M. P.,… Kinnunen, U. (2008). Family-supportive organization perceptions, multiple dimensions of work–family conflict, and employee satisfaction: A test of model across five samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 92–106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., Kao, S.-F., Cooper, C. L., Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., O’Driscoll, M.,… Spector, P. E. (2009). Work resources, work-to-family conflict, and its consequences: A Taiwanese-British cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(1), 25–44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013988Google Scholar
Masuda, A. D., Poelmans, S. A., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L.,… Moreno-Velazquez, I. (2012). Flexible work arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison of three country clusters. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(1), 1–29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.xGoogle Scholar
Miller, K., Greyling, M., Cooper, C., Lu, L., Sparks, K., & Spector, P. E. (2000). Occupational stress and gender: A cross-cultural study. Stress Medicine, 16(5), 271–278. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700%28200010%2916:5%3C271::AID-SMI862%3E3.0.CO;2-G3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niblo, D. M., & Jackson, M. S. (2004). Model for combining the qualitative emic approach with the quantitative derived etic approach. Australian Psychologist, 39(2), 127–133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001701843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., et al. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429–452.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., Alonso, A., & Spector, P. E. (2000). Linguistic Effects on Translated Organizational Measures: A Study of Bilinguals. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Toronto, August.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., & Spector, P. E. (2012). Administrative, measurement, and sampling issues in large-scale cross-national research: UN or NATO approach? [References] Conducting Multinational Research: Applying Organizational Psychology in The Workplace (pp. 123–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S. A., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., O’Driscoll, M.,… Widerszal-Bazyl, M. (2007). Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work–family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 805–835. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00092.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I.,… Yu, S. (2004). A cross-national comparative study of work–family stressors, working hours, and well-being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 119–142. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02486.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., O’Driscoll, M., Sparks, K., Bernin, P.,… Yu, S. (2001). Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: An ecological level international study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 815–832. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., O’Driscoll, M., Sparks, K., Bernin, P.,… Yu, S. (2002). Locus of control and well-being at work: How generalizable are Western findings? Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 453–466. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069359Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sparks, K., Bernin, P., Buessing, A., Dewe, P.,… Yu, S. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(2), 269–281. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00058Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015). Methodological and substantive issues in conducting multinational and cross-cultural research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), null. doi:doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414–111310Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Siu, O. L., Salgado, J., & Ma, J. (2004). Eastern versus Western control beliefs at work: An investigation of secondary control, socioinstrumental control, and work locus of control in China and the US. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(1), 38–60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00160.xGoogle Scholar
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of Culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018938Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002Google Scholar
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In Carroll, R. & Cohen, R. (Eds.), A Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology (pp. 398–420). New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Yang, L.-Q., Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L.,… Woo, J.-m. (2012). Individualism-collectivism as a moderator of the work demands-strains relationship: A cross-level and cross-national examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 424–443. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.58Google Scholar