Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:31:08.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Party System Institutionalization in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Kenneth Mori McElwain
Edited by
Allen Hicken  and
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Kenneth Mori McElwain
Affiliation:
theUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Allen Hicken
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The literature on party systems is composed of two related strands. Studies of emerging democracies typically ask whether the party system is institutionalized: are parties the primary legislative and electoral actors, with deep social roots and routinized patterns of interaction? Those of established democracies, on the other hand, are more concerned with whether the party system is in equilibrium: given status quo socioeconomic and political institutions, are the number of parties and ideological cleavages stable? As this volume’s editors propose, these two approaches are based on distinct conceptions about the role of parties in democracy. In a celebrated quote, Schattschneider (1942: 1) writes, “Political parties created modern democracy and modern democracy is unthinkable save in terms of parties.” In new democracies, parties are seen as organizations whose existence – before, during, and after democratization – is crucial but fragile. Scholars of established democracies, by contrast, assume that parties are here to stay and focus instead on more granular distinctions in the character of the party system.

My goal in this chapter is to integrate these two literatures through the lens of party system institutionalization in Japan. Japan has had the longest history of party politics in Asia, but its functions and salience have varied over time. Parties emerged during the autocratic Meiji period, and they played a valuable role in political liberalization. Despite being derailed by military governments during World War II, parties quickly became a focal point of legislative politics during and after the U.S. occupation. They took on many of the organizational characteristics of their prewar predecessors, and the primary partisan cleavage in Japan, interregional fiscal redistribution, retained its salience throughout. In this sense, the Japanese party system has been institutionalized for a long period of time: legislative politics – both in the autocratic and democratic periods – was the province of political parties that represented urban versus rural socioeconomic divisions in society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Party System Institutionalization in Asia
Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past
 , pp. 74 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Andy, and Scheiner, Ethan. 2004. “Adaptive Parties: Party Strategic Capacity under Japanese SNTV”. Electoral Studies 23: 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ray. 1998. The Effect of Electoral Reforms on Campaign Practices in Japan: Putting New Wine into Old Bottles. Asian Survey 38 (October): 986–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Raymond. 1994. Electoral Reform in Japan: How It Was Enacted and Changes It May Bring. Asian Survey 34(7): 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws. Comparative Political Studies 39(6): 679–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Thies, Michael F.. 1999. Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party. British Journal of Political Science 29: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Gerald L. 1971. Election Campaigning Japanese Style. Tokyo: Kodansha International Ltd.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald L. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
DeWit, Andrew, and Steinmo, Sven. 2002. The Political Economy of Taxes and Redistribution in Japan. Social Science Japan Journal 5(2): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duus, Peter. 1998. Modern Japan. 2nd ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fukatsu, Masami. 1995. Whither Goes the 1955 System?Japan Quarterly 42(2).Google Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro. 1970. Party in Power: The Japanese Liberal Democrats and Policy-Making. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibuki, Ken. 2005. Nihon Seitou-Shi: 1980–1947. Tokyo: Shougaku-sha.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo. 1984. Supportive Participation with Economic Growth: The Case of Japan. World Politics 36(3): 309–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo. 1999. An Ideological Survey of Japan’s National Legislators. Japan Echo (August).Google Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo, and Imai, Ryosuke. 2002. Evaluation of Party Leaders and Voting Behavior: An Analysis of the 2000 General Election. Social Science Japan Journal 5(1): 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Junko. 1998. When the Party Breaks Up: Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators. American Political Science Review 92(4): 857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Katzenstein, Peter, J. (Ed.) Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I. (Eds.). 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kobayashi, Yoshiaki. 1997. Politics in Japan, 1955–1993. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kohno, Masaru. 1997. Japan’s Postwar Party Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S., and Nyblade, Benjamin. 2005. “Presidentialization” in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media, and Elections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science 35: 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S., and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2011. The Rise and Fall of Japan’s LDP: Political Party Organizations as Historical Institutions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein (Eds.). 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1996. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Masumi, Junnosuke. 1985. Postwar Politics in Japan, 1945–1955. Translated by Carlile, L. E.. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori. 2008. Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single Party Dominance. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori. 2009. How Long Are Koizumi’s Coattails? Party-Leader Visits in the 2005 Election. In Reed, S. R., McElwain, K. M., and Shimizu, K. (Eds.), Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms. Palo Alto: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Google Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori. 2012. “The Nationalization of Japanese Elections.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12(3): 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori, and Umeda, Michio. 2011. Party Democratization and the Salience of Party Leaders. Social Science Japan Journal 62(1): 173–193.Google Scholar
Miyake, Ichiro, Nishizawa, Yoshitaka, and Kohno, Masaru. 2001. 55-Nen Taisei-ka no Seiji to Keizai: Jiji Yoron-chousa Data no Bunseki. Tokyo: Bokutaku-sha.Google Scholar
Narita, Norihiko. 1996. Seiji Kaikaku Houan no Seiritsu Katei: Kantei to Yotou no Ugoki wo Chuushin to shite. Hokudai Rippo-Katei Kenkyukai Shiryou 46(6).Google Scholar
Noble, Gregory W. 2010. The Decline of Particularism in Japanese Politics. Journal of East Asian Studies 10: 239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguchi, Yukio. 1997. The Persistence of the 1940 Setup. Japan Echo 24 (Special Issue): 81–89.Google Scholar
Ohmiya, Takeo. 1992. Senkyo-Seido to Giin-Teisuu no Zesei. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Hokuju Shuppan.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 100–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Edited by Katzenstein, P.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth B. 1996. The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1993. Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1995. The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1991. Structure and Behavior: Extending Duverger’s Law to the Japanese Case. British Journal of Political Science 29(1): 335–356.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., and Scheiner, Ethan. 2003. Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science 33: 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan, and Thies, Michael F.. 2009. Party-Centered, More Volatile: New Ballgame in Politics. The Oriental Economist8–9.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., and Thies, Michael F.. 2001a. The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan. In Shugart, M. S. and Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., and Thies, Michael F.. 2001b. The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan. In Shugart, M. S. and Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley M. 1997. Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, Jun. 2009. “Pork Barrel and Partisan Realignment in Japan.” In Reed, S. R., McElwain, K. M., and Shimizu, K. (Eds.), Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms. Palo Alto: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J. 2007. Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 1999. Urban Outfitters: City-Based Strategies and Success in Post-war Japanese Politics. Electoral Studies 18: 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Jacob M. 1997. Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan’s Postwar Political Machine. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 2002. Implications of the Effective Number of Parties for Cabinet Formation. Party Politics 8(2): 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takenaka, Harukata. 2002. Senzen Nihon ni Okeru Minshuka no Zasetsu: Minshuka Tojo Taisei Houkai no Bunseki. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Masaki. 2004. Electoral Reform in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Thies, Michael. 1998. When Will Pork Leave the Farm? Institutional Bias in Japan and the United States. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(4): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, Brian. 1996. Japan under Construction: Corruption, Politics, and Public Works. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woodall, Brian. 1999. The Politics of Reform in Japan’s Lower House Electoral System. In Grofman, B., Lee, S.-C., Winckler, E. A., and Woodall, B. (Eds.), Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, Yasushi, Koschmann, J. Victor, and Narita, Ryuichi (Eds.). 1998. Total War and “Modernization.”Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×