Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:44:09.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Long in the Making: Taiwan’s Institutionalized Party System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Tun-jen Cheng
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary
Yung-ming Hsu
Affiliation:
Soochow University
Allen Hicken
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Introduction

By any criteria, major parties and the party system in newly democratized Taiwan are fairly institutionalized. The two leading parties – the Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) – are enduring, resilient, and well embedded in their support bases. Factions have existed within each party, and factional conflict can be acute, but factionalism has not undermined party coherence or identity. During the extended period of democratic transition, the two leading parties – at times, in accord with their affiliated partners – have competed fiercely but principally at the ballot box rather than in the streets or under the shadow of democracy-inhibiting forces such as the military or insurgents. By and large, the two political camps have accepted electoral competition as the only legitimate avenue to power, the emotional confrontation on the street over the contested result of the presidential election in 2004 being a notable exception. The magnitude of electoral volatility has been small by comparison with other young democracies in the region. Typically, the dominant KMT ebbed and the DPP flowed, both incrementally rather than abruptly. With the deepening of democratization, electoral volatility increased, especially in recent elections, but the spikes were transitional, caused by a major electoral reform that has effectively eliminated all small parties.

Type
Chapter
Information
Party System Institutionalization in Asia
Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past
, pp. 108 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, Andre, Bowler, Shuan, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen. 2003. Political Institutions and the Malaise of East Asian New Democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies 3(1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen. 2006. Strategizing Party Adaptation: The Case of the Kuomintang. Party Politics 12(3): 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen. 2008. Embracing Defeat: the PRI and the KMT after 2000. In Friedman, Edward and Wong, Joseph (Eds.), Learning to Lose, pp. 127–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Hsu, Yung-min. 1996. Issue Dynamics, Opposition Factionalism, and Party Realignment. In Tien, Hung-mao (Ed.), Taiwan’s Elections and Democratic Transition, pp. 137–173. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Hsu, Yung-min. 2007. Party System, Coalition Politics and Cross-Strait Relations. In Chow, Peter (Ed.), Economic Integration, Democratization, and National Security in East Asia, pp. 56–82. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Liao, Da-chi. 2006. Testing the Immune System of a Newly Born Democracy. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2(1): 81–102.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Lin, Gang. 2007. Competitive Election. In Gilley, Bruce and Diamond, Larry (Eds.), Political Change in China: Comparisons with Taiwan, pp. 161–183. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Clark, Caleb. 2003. Lee Teng-hui and the Emergence of a Competitive Party System in Taiwan. In Lee, Wei-chin and Wang, T. Y. (Eds.), Sayonara to the Lee Teng-hui Era, pp. 91–112. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1991. SNTV and d’Hondt are “Equivalent.”Electoral Studies 10(2): 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Emerson, . 1994. Seat Bonuses under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan. Comparative Politics 26(2): 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Bruce. 1997. Democratization in China and Taiwan. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Edward. 2007. China’s Incorporation of Taiwan: The Manipulation of Community Tensions. In Chow, Peter (Ed.), Economic Integration, Democratization, and National Security in East Asia, pp. 29–55. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ho, Szu-yin, and Liu, I-chou. 2003. The Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of the Taiwan People in the 1990s. In Lee, Weic-chin and Wang, T. Y. (Eds.), Sayonara to the Lee Teng-hui Era, pp. 149–184. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Huang, Teh-fu. 1996. Elections and the Evolution of the Kuomintang. In Tien, Hung-mao (Ed.), Taiwan’s Elections and Democratic Transition, pp. 105–136. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lei, Fei-long. 1992. The Electoral System and Voting Behavior in Taiwan. In Cheng, Tun-jen and Haggard, Stephan (Eds.), Political Change in Taiwan, pp. 149–176. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Liu, I-chou. 1990. The Electoral Effect of Social Context Control on Voters: The Case of Taipei, Taiwan. Ph.D. dissertation in Political Science. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2(2): 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, Shing-yuan, and Chen, Yih-yan. 2003. Political Cleavage and Party Competition: An Analysis of the 2001 Legislative Yuan Election. Journal of Electoral Studies 10(1): 7–40 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Shyu, Huoyan. 2002. Partisan’s Territory Lines Redrawn in Taiwan: A Comparison of the Electoral Bases of the DPP, KMT and PFP. Soochow Journal of Political Science 14: 83–134 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Tien, Hungmao, and Cheng, Tun-jen. 1997. Crafting Democratic Institutions in Taiwan. The China Journal (37): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yeh-li. 2001. Comparative Electoral Systems. Taipei: Wu-nan [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Yu, Eric Chen-hwa. 2008. Dynamics of Partisanship, National Identity, and Issue Cleavages in the DPP Era. Paper presented at the Conference on Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan, Stanford University, May 30–31, 2008.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×