Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:56:52.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Party System Institutionalization: Reflections Based on the Asian Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Scott Mainwaring
Edited by
Allen Hicken  and
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Scott Mainwaring
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Allen Hicken
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

In this concluding chapter, I offer some reflections on party system institutionalization based on the Asian cases examined in this volume. I take up four themes that are central to the book. First, I analyze why party system institutionalization remains an important theme for political scientists. In democracies and semi-democracies, some of the most important differences among party systems revolve around variance in institutionalization. Differences in party system institutionalization have important consequences both in competitive and authoritarian regimes.

Second, I argue that the most fundamental distinction among the cases analyzed in this volume is among competitive party systems, hegemonic party systems, and party-state systems. Competitive party systems are anchored in semi-democratic or democratic regimes. Elections are the route to executive and legislative power, and they are organized primarily around parties. Parties also structure legislatures in these systems. Hence, they are key to gaining access to power and to governing. Hegemonic party systems and party-state systems function within authoritarian regimes. Parties are important in these systems, but elections are not the primary route to executive or legislative power. Parties perform different functions in these nondemocratic regimes. Failure to observe a distinction among these three kinds of systems can lead to conceptual confusion and measurement problems, and to difficulty in understanding the relationship between party system institutionalization and democracy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Party System Institutionalization in Asia
Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past
 , pp. 328 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basedau, M., and Stroh, A.. 2008. Measuring Party Institutionalization in Developing Countries: A New Research Instrument Applied to 28 African Political Parties. German Institute of Global and Area Studies Working Paper No. 69 (February). Available at .
Bellin, E. 2012. Reconsidering the Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East. Comparative Politics 44(2): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, J. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Croissant, A. and Völkel, P.. 2012. Party System Types and Party System Institutionalization: Comparing New Democracies in East and Southeast Asia. Party Politics 18(2): 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J., and Weldon, S.. 2007. Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics 13(2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, R. H. 1992. Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies 24(4): 488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flores Macías, G. A. 2012. After Neoliberalism? The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., and Schickler, E.. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, K. F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermet, G., Rose, R., and Rouquié, A. (Eds.). 1978. Elections without Choice. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
Hicken, A. 2006. Stuck in the Mud: Parties and Party Systems in Democratic Southeast Asia. The Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2(2): 23–46.Google Scholar
Hicken, A. 2008. Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicken, A., and Kuhonta, E.. 2011. Shadows from the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia. Comparative Political Studies 44(5): 572–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, K. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross National Survey. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. P. 2002. Streams of Least Resistance: The Institutionalization of Political Parties and Democracy in Indonesia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.
Jones, M. P. 2010. Political Parties and Party Systems in Latin America. In Scartascini, C., Stein, E., and Tomassi, M. (Eds.), How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, pp. 19–46. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M.. 2008. Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2007. The World Bank (June). Available at .
Levitsky, S. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S., and Way, L.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. I. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. I. 2007. Institutionalization of Party Systems? Stability and Fluidity among Legislative Parties in Africa’s Democracies. Government and Opposition 42(2): 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J., and Stepan, A.. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan, S. (Eds.). 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, pp. 1–64. New York: Free Press.
Loaeza, S. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional: La larga marcha, 1939–1994. Oposición leal y partido de protesta. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S. P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. P., Brinks, D., and Pérez-Liñán, A.. 2007. Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945–2004. In Munck, G. L. (Ed.), Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods, pp. 123–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. P., and Scully, T. R. (Eds.). 1995. Party Systems in Latin America. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, pp. 1–34. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, S. P., and Torcal, M.. 2006. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. In Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W. (Eds.), Handbook of Political Parties, pp. 204–227. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. W. 1997. Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 2011. Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, R. G. 2001. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Moser, R. G., and Scheiner, E.. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary across New and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, G. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5(1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, A. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, A., and Mainwaring, S. P.. 2013. Regime Legacies and Levels of Democracy: Evidence from Latin America. Comparative Politics 45: 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, V., and Svåsand, L.. 2002. Party Institutionalization in New Democracies. Party Politics 8: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, R. B. 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa: A Comparative Study of Ghana, Senegal, Gambia, and Benin. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, G., and Sartori, G.. 1983. Polarization, Fragmentation, and Competition in Western Democracies. In Daalder, H. and Mair, P. (Eds.), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, pp. 307–340. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. 1995. Under- and Overinstitutionalization: Some Ideal Typical Propositions Concerning Old and New Party Systems. University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute for International Studies Working Paper #213 (March).
Schedler, A. (Ed.). 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Seawright, J. 2012. Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. 2005. Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule. World Politics 57 (April): 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, H. 2001. Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 34(1): 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P. J. 2006. Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy. Contemporary Southeast Asia 28(1): 88–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ufen, A. 2008. Political Party and Party System Institutionalization in South East Asia: Lessons for Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. The Pacific Review i327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, C. (Forthcoming). Estabilidad sin raíces: la institucionalización del sistema de partidos brasileño. In Torcal, M. (Ed.), Los problemas de la institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos en América Latina. Barcelona: CIDOB.
Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary 1963: 895

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×