To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By 1709 Dublin was second in importance only to London in the burgeoning British Empire. An ever increasing number of ships from Europe, Jamaica and elsewhere, transiting through Irish ports, brought with them luxury goods such as wines, spirits and lemons. In an effort to get around one inconvenience of the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–13), French wine was sometimes rebranded as ‘Irish wine’ before being sent on to London. Another thriving industry was linen production, largely controlled by traders from northern counties, although Dublin retained its position as the chief marketplace for linen that was whitened. Yet the city's wide streets and gracious buildings belied the poverty of many of its residents. Charity remained largely in the hands of local churches and David Dickson suggests that the Protestant poor may have been better catered for than Catholics, as parishes had systems in place to raise taxes to support them. In 1706 the workhouse in St James's opened its doors, but here the focus was on work, with little provision for healthcare, and while in 1710 Dr Richard Steevens left money to fund a hospital ‘for maintaining and curing from time to time such sick and wounded persons whose Distemper and Wounds are curable’, it was another decade before anything resembling a voluntary hospital would be operational in the city.
This book chronicles the great Palatine migration of 1709, the descendants of which are scattered throughout Ireland, Britain, America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and elsewhere. It is also a book about identity, and specifically the difficulty which arises from ascribing identities to groups of migrants. Such imputations can prove difficult to shake off, which happened with the ‘poor Protestant Palatines fleeing persecution’, as they are still recalled three hundred years later. Perhaps this is not surprising given that, in an eighteenth-century public relations exercise, the pens of luminaries such as Daniel Defoe, Jonathan Swift and Joseph Addison were set to work framing and reframing Palatine identity, following the arrival of at least 13,500 migrants in London in one six-month period.
This book highlights overlapping social and religious networks which enabled the Palatine migration to take place in the first instance. It explains how, in an era of rapid colonial expansion, plans were afoot as early as 1705 to move large groups of European migrants to the New World. But issues surrounding religious dissent informed the welcome afforded to Palatines in both Britain and Ireland and help to explain why the numbers of Palatines remaining in Ireland is underestimated.
The Palatines were not the only large group to depart Europe in a thirty-year timeframe. Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 by King Louis XIV saw an estimated 200,000 Huguenots flee France with an estimated 40,000 settling in England, while it is estimated 10,000 Huguenots settled in Ireland.
Open City and The Other Crucifix explore another component of flight—the frustrations that come with unrealized dreams. This chapter examines the American Dream as one of the motivating factors for flight and its inaccessibility by the migrant upon arrival in America. What emerges in these two novels is that, regardless of the promise of freedom and liberty, the realities are different. Julius in Open City and Jojo in The Other Crucifix struggle to overcome social exclusion and the economic barriers to improvement. The references to similar migrant experiences in the scenes in Brussels in Open City again speak to a broader conception of fragility and brokenness in migrant life abroad. While Jojo arguably achieves his dream, the novel's end suggests that the upward climb to social integration has only just started.
Teju Cole's Open City can be read as a prologue to The Other Crucifix in terms of the promise of migration and the subsequent reversal of the migrant's expectations. Its protagonist, Julius, is from Nigeria, on a psychiatric fellowship conducting a clinical study of affective disorders in the elderly. Based in New York City, a place that can be characterized as an “open city” with endless possibilities and where dreams are accomplished, Julius goes through a process of psychological turmoil as he comes face to face with the realities of life in the West. Like Jojo Badu, Julius's sense of migration is based on the ideologies associated with the promise of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” which they would have read about back home in Ghana and Nigeria and are now striving to achieve in the United States.
Peter the Deacon, hagiographer, chronicler, classical scholar, forger, and serial liar, is not as familiar to Anglophone medievalists as other similar (if perhaps less outrageous) figures such as Abbo of Fleury and Osbert of Clare. Yet he is hardly unknown to the wider world of medieval scholarship. It was indeed more than a century ago that the German historian Erich Caspar published a brilliant pioneering monograph that revealed his many-sided, if seemingly bizarre, intellectual activity. More recently, if still some considerable time ago, the Harvard classicist and medievalist Herbert Bloch devoted a number of studies over half a century to aspects of Peter's work, as well as to the wider intellectual and religious environment of the abbey of Montecassino in the early and central Middle Ages. Other distinguished scholars have also made significant contributions to our understanding of Peter the Deacon, notably Paul Meyvaert, Hartmut Hoffmann, Jean-Marie Martin, and my own doctoral supervisor John Cowdrey. Why then might this be a good moment to attempt a reassessment of this interesting, if in the last resort perhaps relatively peripheral, figure in the history of medieval monasticism?
First, because for all the fine studies devoted to the various works that Peter produced during some twenty-five or so years of busy – one might almost say compulsive – writing, there has been no real attempt since Caspar's book of 1909 to draw these threads together in a summary that places his career in its proper context.
This article examines hagiographical evidence for medieval Brittany's rich culture, in particular its traditions about Arthur: legends that attest to the region's connections with Tatlock's ‘great world’ and yet are distinctively Breton. The Arthurian Latin-Breton Saints’ Lives considered here are rarely discussed in medieval scholarship, and the larger argument that they support – that they testify to a vibrant medieval Breton culture – is seldom advanced. Indeed, the disparaging remark in the epigraph to this article still represents widespread attitudes towards medieval Brittany, which both British and French historians have characterised as ‘peripheral, backward, and, because of its Celtic history, different and atypical’. This stance towards modern Brittany appears to exist even at a national level. The French state's aggressive attempts to promote (French) linguistic uniformity in previously predominantly Breton-speaking areas, thus promoting ‘an internalised sense of inferiority and shame’, may be viewed as just one example. The history of such perceptions of Brittany as far-flung and rustic goes back much further. It is telling that the region's westernmost department is called in French ‘Finistère’, derived from the Latin finis terræ, meaning ‘the end of the earth/land’. However, historian Caroline Brett's recent work indirectly challenges conceptions of medieval Brittany as a cultural backwater through demonstrating heavy Breton involvement in English and French political and dynastic affairs between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries, and close cultural ties between Brittany and Wales. The present examination of Arthur's hagiographical characterisation reinforces the case for medieval western Brittany's cultural sophistication.
Book VI is most usefully perceived as a discussion of government considered in its three functions: judicial, legislative, and executive. It is further testimony to Gower's growing sense of the inadequacy of the three estates as a device for a socio-political analysis of England in the late fourteenth century. The book begins with a scathing account of legal practitioners, starting with the pleaders, the experts of the common law consulted by individuals involved in suits brought before the royal courts. Supposedly guarantors of the king's justice which his judges are obligated to deliver, corrupt lawyers are driven by avarice and concerned primarily with the acquisition of property, twisting the law through sophistry and trickery. The judges, sheriffs, bailiffs, and witnesses, who likewise share responsibility for the failure of justice in the realm, are attacked in their turn for their own avaricious misconduct. Although Gower's major judicial concern is the common law, he also evidences knowledge of the other legal codes – customary, civil and canon – present in fourteenthcentury England.
The legislative branch is assailed in its expression as king's councils, in which his counsellors presumably advise the monarch of the best courses of action. Although parliament was becoming increasingly important, Gower does not include it in his discussion. Legislatures were not seen in his day as the inevitable outcome of a government's perceived need for guidance from constituent assemblies. The history of the papacy, which mirrors imperial and regal courts, offers a fruitful comparison.
The rise of the court as the most important stage for politics was a major trend in the nineteenth century. Here the political infighting between different factions took place, here the victories over rival factions had to be won. Successful political careers were made at the court and nowhere else. The capital thus was also the place where a new elite emerged. The emerging political centres tried to push through a growing bureaucratisation, best visible in an array of new offices and titles among the king's entourage. Nonetheless, the number of new offices does not inevitably indicate a growing bureaucratisation. Offices were often awarded to loyal clients as were slaves, estates and the spoils of war. More important, however, was the marginalisation of power loci outside the court as the centre tried to grab the political and economic decision-making from the local authorities. This, however, was a fragile and often incomplete process, where established patterns of power-broking mingled with the new models enforced by the political centre. For the expanding states like Buganda and Rwanda, the logistical and infrastructural challenges were enormous. Military expeditions had to be organised and supported with food and labour; newly acquired territories had to be incorporated and administered. War, however, was only one dimension of this expansion. Interlacustrine states intensified their diplomacy with each other and with other powers outside the region. Trade brought an influx of new goods and of new actors. To manage these contacts, the interlacustrine powers needed skilful diplomats and administrators. New offices developed from the households of the ruler, while others were created from scratch, based on new understandings of territorial administration and state power. Some societies adopted successful models from their neighbours, other were forcefully pushed to do so by the hegemonic powers of the region.
Among several detailed, step-by-step medieval guides to contemplative technique that were composed within the century between about 1165 and 1270, two stand out as particularly influential: Richard of St. Victor's De contemplatione maior (alternatively called “The Mystical Ark” or “Benjamin Major” in English) and greatly influenced by it, composed around one hundred years later, Bonaventure's Itinerarium mentis in Deum (“The mind's journey into God”). In this chapter, I focus on the central importance of “envisioning,” a particular kind of mental visio, as the primary engine of meditation for theological contemplation. In medieval monastic life envisioning was a learned craft practice, not reserved only to momentary rapture (though for a very few, it might include such a rare, divine gift), nor was it a medical or drug-induced condition (though my own students have sometimes assumed it must have been). Indeed, the craft of mental envisioning was not thought to be different from reasoning, but the first essential step in every sort of rationally imagined composing.
Rhetoric is a profoundly social art, directed primarily to composition with the goal not of “self-expression” nor of communicating over a distance to some statistically constructed market of consumers, but of publicly persuading a particular audience of various people who are physically present with you in a particular place and time to do something, such as to believe you because they have enough trust (fides) in what you say to be willing to believe and act as you have convinced them to do.
Oxford's colleges are home to one of the richest concentrations of medieval charters anywhere in Britain and Ireland. If this fact has not exactly gone unnoticed, it is not since the days of Herbert Salter (1863–1951), whose knowledge of Oxford and its history made him the undisputed heir to Anthony Wood (1632–1695), that they have been worked on systematically as a collective whole. This article focuses on what is easily the largest single collection of charters within Oxford, which is today housed at Magdalen College, where Salter himself held a research fellowship from 1918 to 1939. It does so within the context of scribal identification – and self-identification – in the period before c. 1300. As any undergraduate student of medieval history soon learns, this was a crucial period for the development of the written word in northern Europe, the mechanics of which, in England, have been traced most memorably – and most influentially – by Michael Clanchy. It is nevertheless one in which most scholarly attention has focused on the literary and documentary cultures found in medieval England's most celebrated abbeys, cathedrals, and major urban centres, of which Oxford itself was one.
This article takes a different approach by exploring the activities of those working as charter scribes in what might be considered somewhat more ‘ordinary’ – although no less important – settings, specifically those found in medieval England's small towns, villages, and hamlets (what might otherwise be referred to as its ‘hinterlands’).
5.1 Introduction: Viking Raids on Churches and the Political Imperative
As was shown in Chapter 4, after 850, Viking theft of church metalwork is unheard of, and church burning – perhaps to extort protection payments, if English and Frankish evidence be a guide – is rare. Since they run counter to the tendency to report some raids in greater detail after c. 850, there seems little doubt that both of these were real developments. Such modified behaviour must be linked with Viking aims and strategies, perhaps with settlement at Dublin and elsewhere. This would also explain sparing churches within a radius of thirty-five kilometres of Dublin, noted in Chapter 3. A further significant development was alliance with Gaelic Irish leaders to raid churches, first noticed in 842 and again in 850. At this level at least, political considerations began to play a part. A direct link between Viking raiding and involvement in Irish dynastic politics is studied closely in the chapters that follow this. Alfred Smyth long ago proposed that Viking politico-military alignments determined the choice of some churches raided in the first half of the tenth century. Poul Holm made a similar point about several later ninth-century raids.
These are valid insights, and in an earlier publication I detected such a dimension to many Viking church raids in the second half of the ninth century. After 850 up to 900, some three quarters of Viking raids on churches may be linked with various degrees of confidence to documented relations between Vikings and Gaelic Irish dynasts.