We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To identify politico-economic factors relating to policy surrounding the production, processing and trade of sugar in Indonesia and identify strategies to support improved integration of national nutrition and food security priorities with respect to sugar.
Design:
This study was a qualitative policy analysis, informed by political economy and power analysis approaches and drawing on both documentary policy data and interviews.
Setting:
Indonesia.
Participants:
Interviewees from various national and sub-national government and non-government sectors, with expertise in health and food safety (n 7), finance and economics (n 2), trade and industry (n 3) and others (n 4).
Results:
Sugar was articulated as a policy priority in three distinct ways: (1) sugar as an economic good; (2) sugar in relation to health and (3) sugar as a commodity for food security. High political priority was given to national economic development, as well as concerns relating to farmer rights and welfare. Nutrition priorities and objectives to reduce sugar consumption were addressed in health policies; however, they were not reflected in production and economic policies promoting sugar.
Conclusions:
Creating opportunities to diversify agricultural production and ensuring a just transition to protect the livelihoods of sugar farmers in Indonesia will be crucial in enabling the achievement of nutrition priorities to reduce sugar consumption.
Extant literature reveals how patients of marginalized social identities, socioeconomic status (SES), and medical experiences – especially patients of color and older adults – are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). Emerging evidence increasingly indicates CCT underrepresentation among patients of lower SES or rural origin, sexual and gender minorities, and patients with comorbid disability. This review applies an intersectional perspective to characterizing CCT representativeness across race and ethnicity, age, sexual and gender identity, SES, and disability. Four databases were systematically queried for articles addressing CCT participation inequities across these marginalizing indicators, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One hundred one articles were included in a qualitative evaluation of CCT representativeness within each target population in the context of their intersectional impacts on participation. Findings corroborate strong evidence of CCT underrepresentation among patients of color, older age, lower SES, rural origin, and comorbid disabling conditions while highlighting systemic limitations in data available to characterize representativeness. Results emphasize how observed inequities interactively manifest through the compounding effects of minoritized social identity, inequitable economic conditions, and marginalizing medical experiences. Recommendations are discussed to more accurately quantify CCT participation inequities across underserved cancer populations and understand their underpinning mechanisms.
To evaluate the motor proficiency, identify risk factors for abnormal motor scores, and examine the relationship between motor proficiency and health-related quality of life in school-aged patients with CHD.
Study design:
Patients ≥ 4 years old referred to the cardiac neurodevelopmental program between June 2017 and April 2020 were included. Motor skills were evaluated by therapist-administered Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second-Edition Short Form and parent-reported Adaptive Behavior Assessment System and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Inventory System Physical Functioning questionnaires. Neuropsychological status and health-related quality of life were assessed using a battery of validated questionnaires. Demographic, clinical, and educational variables were collected from electronic medical records. General linear modelling was used for multivariable analysis.
Results:
The median motor proficiency score was the 10th percentile, and the cohort (n = 272; mean age: 9.1 years) scored well below normative values on all administered neuropsychological questionnaires. In the final multivariable model, worse motor proficiency score was associated with family income, presence of a genetic syndrome, developmental delay recognised in infancy, abnormal neuroimaging, history of heart transplant, and executive dysfunction, and presence of an individualised education plan (p < 0.03 for all predictors). Worse motor proficiency correlated with reduced health-related quality of life. Parent-reported adaptive behaviour (p < 0.001) and physical functioning (p < 0.001) had a strong association with motor proficiency scores.
Conclusion:
This study highlights the need for continued motor screening for school-aged patients with CHD. Clinical factors, neuropsychological screening results, and health-related quality of life were associated with worse motor proficiency.
Given the dramatic growth in the financial burden of cancer care over the past decades, individuals with cancer are increasingly susceptible to developing social needs (e.g., housing instability and food insecurity) and experiencing an adverse impact of these needs on care management and health outcomes. However, resources required to connect individuals with needed social and community services typically exceed the available staffing within clinical teams. Using input from focus groups, key informant interviews, user experience/user interface testing, and a multidisciplinary community advisory board, we developed a new technology solution, ConnectedNest, which connects individuals in need to community based organizations (CBOs) that provide services through direct and/or oncology team referrals, with interfaces to support all three groups (patients, CBOs, and oncology care teams). After prototype development, we conducted usability testing, with participants noting the importance of the technology for filling a current gap in screening and connecting individuals with cancer with needed social and community services. We employ a patient-empowered approach that engages the support of an individual’s healthcare team and community organizations. Future work will examine the integration and implementation of ConnectedNest for oncology patients, oncology care teams, and cancer-focused CBOs to build capacity for effectively addressing distress in this population.
Declining labor force participation of older men throughout the 20th century and recent increases in participation have generated substantial interest in understanding the effect of public pensions on retirement. The National Bureau of Economic Research's International Social Security (ISS) Project, a long-term collaboration among researchers in a dozen developed countries, has explored this and related questions. The project employs a harmonized approach to conduct within-country analyses that are combined for meaningful cross-country comparisons. The key lesson is that the choices of policy makers affect the incentive to work at older ages and these incentives have important effects on retirement behavior.
A gap in the literature exists pertaining to a global research nurse/research midwife resources and communication skill set necessary to engage with participants of diverse populations and geographic regions in the community or home-based conduct of decentralized clinical trials.
Aims:
An embedded mixed methods study was conducted to examine research nurse/research midwife knowledge base, experiences, and communication skill sets pertaining to decentralized trials across global regions engaged in remote research: the USA, Republic of Ireland, United Kingdom, and Australia.
Methods:
An online survey was deployed across international research nurse/research midwife stakeholder groups, collecting demographics, decentralized trial experience, barriers and facilitators to optimal trial conduct, and the self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) and interpersonal communication competence (IPCC) instruments.
Results:
86 research nurses and research midwives completed the survey across all countries: The SPCC and IPCC results indicated increased clinical research experience significantly correlated with increased SPCC score (p < 0.05). Qualitative content analysis revealed five themes: (1) Implications for Role, (2) Safety and Wellbeing, (3) Training and Education, (4) Implications for Participants, and (5) Barriers and Facilitators.
Conclusions:
Common trends and observations across the global sample can inform decentralized trial resource allocation and policy pertaining to the research nurse/research midwife workforce. This study demonstrates shared cultural norms of research nursing and midwifery across varied regional clinical trial ecosystems.
It is never easy to write about death, particularly from the margins, and even less after 2020 and 2021. For us, ‘margins’ do not only imply a georeference – the location of a country and its relation to the centres of power – but also how ‘marginal’ states and subjects react to emergencies: the very fabric of the health, information and governmental systems. And margins themselves are multiple: within the Latin American contexts we write about, there are margins, and then there are margins. If it is true that a global pandemic necessarily has consequences for the human species, the experience of COVID-19 also has its specificities, depending on, among other things, geography, race, ethnicity and economic class. As one colleague lamented, “We may all be in the same ocean, but we are not in the same boat”. Latin America, a region historically characterized by grave inequality and a generalized distrust in public institutions, presents particular challenges.
In Western immunological discourse, the body is seen as a battle site between the individual and a series of foreign invaders, non-selves that threaten the integrity of the self. War is waged through the establishment of protection protocols and the acquisition of appropriate knowledge, actions that function to reaffirm the boundaries between self and non-self (Martin, 1990: 411). But these protocols and other immunological gestures block off precisely the forms of contact that permit care and empathy. Both physically and discursively, these gestures separate selves and others, wrapping them in protective plastic in an attempt to avoid contagion. However, in the context of a pandemic, biological and cultural immune systems are necessarily overwhelmed. Corruption flourishes and rumours flow, like the virus itself. The chaotic movement of information and access to health and other public services contributes to an atmosphere of uncertainty and anxiety around bodies in contact and shared spaces. “No one knows what's going to happen”, we are told. And those who have been ‘touched’ by the pandemic, those who have become sick or lost loved ones, find themselves trapped in their grief; the protocols put into place to protect them restrict their access to the ‘normal’ rituals that are supposed to help them deal with death and absence.
Daily driving behavior is ultimate measure of cognitive functioning requiring multiple cognitive domains working synergistically to complete this complex instrumental activity of daily living. As the world’s population continues to grow and age older, motor vehicle crashes become more frequent. Cognitive and brain reserve are developing constructs that are frequently assessed in aging research. Cognitive reserve preserves functioning in the face of greater loss of brain structure as experienced during cognitive impairment or dementia. This study determined whether cognitive reserve and brain reserve predict changes in adverse driving behaviors in cognitively normal older adults.
Participants and Methods:
Cognitively normal participants (Clinical Dementia Rating 0) were enrolled from longitudinal studies at the Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at Washington University. Participants (n=186) were ≥ 65 years of age, required to have Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data, neuropsychological testing data, as well as one full year of naturalistic driving data prior to the beginning of COVID-19 lockdown in the United States (March 2020). Naturalistic driving behavior data was collected via the Driving Real World In-vehicle Evaluation System (DRIVES). DRIVES variables included idle time, over speeding, aggression, number of trips, including those at day and night. MRI was performed on 3T Tesla using a research imaging protocol based upon ADNI that includes a high-resolution T1 MPRAGE for assessment of brain structures to produce normalized whole brain volume (WBV) and hippocampal volume (HV). WBV and HV were each assessed using tertiles comparing the top 66% with the bottom 33% where the bottom represented increased atrophy. The Word Reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT 4) was utilized as a proxy for cognitive reserve. WRAT 4 scores were compared with the top 66% and the bottom 33% where the bottom were poor performers. Linear-mixed-effect models adjusted for age, education, and sex.
Results:
Participants on average were older (73.7±4.9), college educated (16.6±2.2), and similar sex distribution (males=100, females=86). Analyses showed statistically significant differences in slopes where participants with increased hippocampal and whole brain atrophy were less likely to overspeed (p=0.0035; p=0.0003), drive aggressively (p=0.0016; p<0.0001), and drive during the daytime (p<0.0001; p<0.0001). However, they were more likely to spend more time idling (p=0.0005; p<0.0001) and drive during the nighttime (p=0.003; p=0.0002). Similar findings occurred with the WRAT 4 where participants with lower scores were less likely to overspeed (p=0.0035), drive aggressively (p=0.0024), hard brake (p=0.0180), and drive during the daytime (p<0.0001) while they were more likely to also spend more time idling (p=0.0012) and drive during the nighttime (p=0.0004).
Conclusions:
Numerous changes in driving behaviors over time were predicted by increased hippocampal and whole brain atrophy as well as lower cognitive reserve scores proxied by the WRAT 4. These changes show that those with lower brain and cognitive reserve are more likely to restrict their driving behavior and adapt their daily behaviors as they age. These results suggest older adults with lower brain and cognitive reserve are more likely to avoid highways where speeding and aggressive maneuvers are more frequent.
Spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), is an invasive insect that was first detected in the United States in 2014 and feeds on a wide variety of plants, with economic impacts on the agricultural, ornamental, and timber industries. Part of what likely contributes to the success of L. delicatula in its invaded range is that it appears to be chemically defended by sequestering toxins from its host plant(s), which may deter predators in the introduced range. To determine the identity and behavior of North American predators that feed on spotted lanternfly, we performed a community science study in which we asked members of the public to contribute reports of animals feeding on spotted lanternfly through a Facebook page. The largest group of reported predators was arthropods followed by birds. Araneae was the arthropod order with the most reports and Phasianidae was the most frequently reported bird family. Using Pearson's χ2 tests, we also identified significant relationships between predator behavior and (1) taxonomic group of the predator, (2) L. delicatula life stage, and (3) host plant L. delicatula was observed on. These results can help to guide future research on predator host shifting to spotted lanternfly and potential for biocontrol as a management tactic.
Aims and auditable outcomes: We aim to ensure 100% patients on clozapine have annual physical health checks. By ensuring all patients prescribed clozapine therapy receive an annual physical health check and medic review, we aim to improve patient safety and prevent serious harm from occurring in cases that could be avoided.
Methods
All patients aged over 18 years prescribed Clozapine, who were under the assessment and treatment service in Eastbourne, were identified using Carenotes, our electronic patient records system.
Results
78% of patients on clozapine had been reviewed by a doctor in the past 12 months. 32% of patients had attended a physical health review within the past 12 months. One patient had not had a medical review for several years.
Conclusion
Our audit has shown that there are no clear guidelines on the long term monitoring of clozapine in regards to physical health reviews and psychiatric assessment. Using best practice it appears annual review should be the minimal standard, however further evaluation of this is recommended at trust level.
In response to these results and the current guidance, we would like to implement the following:
• Create a database for all patients on Clozapine under the care of Eastbourne ATS.
• Create a spreadsheet looked after by one member of admin staff to be updated regularly
• The physical health lead nurse to be informed of physical health checks due by admin
Opportunities exist to leverage mobile phones to replace or supplement in-person supervision of lay counselors. However, contextual variables, such as network connectivity and provider preferences, must be considered. Using an iterative and mixed methods approach, we co-developed implementation guidelines to support the implementation of mobile phone supervision with lay counselors and supervisors delivering a culturally adapted trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy in Western Kenya. Guidelines were shared and discussed with lay counselors in educational outreach visits led by supervisors. We evaluated the impact of guidelines and outreach on the acceptability, feasibility, and usability of mobile phone supervision. Guidelines were associated with significant improvements in acceptability and usability of mobile phone supervision. There was no evidence of a significant difference in feasibility. Qualitative interviews with lay counselors and supervisors contextualized how guidelines impacted acceptability and feasibility – by setting expectations for mobile phone supervision, emphasizing importance, increasing comfort, and sharing strategies to improve mobile phone supervision. Introducing and discussing co-developed implementation guidelines significantly improved the acceptability and usability of mobile phone supervision. This approach may provide a flexible and scalable model to address challenges with implementing evidence-based practices and implementation strategies in lower-resourced areas.
Existing studies have identified the national rate of PVT for severely injured patients to be 9-16%, our ED has displayed a PVT incidence of 35.4%, suggesting a substantial difference in ED arrival. This study aims to explore descriptive demographics and injury characteristics of patients who arrived by PVT to our ED.
Method:
A prospective, single-center observational study conducted in Detroit, Michigan. Included patients aged 15 ≥ years who arrived at the ED by PVT for blunt or penetrating trauma. The sample population consisted of 128 patients from August 2019-April 2021. Each subject completed a survey regarding their injury and prehospital care. A retrospective chart review was conducted to acquire information on their injuries.
Results:
The mean age was 44.3 ± 20.3 years old, range 15-93. 51/128 female, 77/128 male. Patients comprised 93/128 African American, 19/128 Caucasian, 4/128 Asian, 4/128 Hispanic/Latino, and 8/128 other. The most common insurance was Medicaid, comprising 63/128 patients, 25/128 of patients had Medicare and 38/128 had private coverage. Utilizing ESI indices to evaluate severity levels, 73/128 arrived at the ED with an ESI level of 3, 47/128 level of 2, 5/128 level of 4, and 3/128 level of 1, the most severe. Majority of patients 36/128, presented with trauma-related injuries due to a fall. 25/128 presented with a laceration, and 22/128 presented after a motor vehicle crash. The upper extremities were the most common location of trauma 38/128 followed by the lower extremities 23/128. The mean ED length of stay was 11.18 hours.
Conclusion:
Overall, the findings from this study allowed us to characterize our population of PVT trauma patients through their demographics and injury characteristics. We were able to establish some descriptive characteristics that delineate the population of patients at our ED in Detroit, which is the first step in identifying why trauma patients choose varying modes of transportation.
We aimed to understand which non-household activities increased infection odds and contributed greatest to SARS-CoV-2 infections following the lifting of public health restrictions in England and Wales.
Procedures
We undertook multivariable logistic regressions assessing the contribution to infections of activities reported by adult Virus Watch Community Cohort Study participants. We calculated adjusted weighted population attributable fractions (aPAF) estimating which activity contributed greatest to infections.
Findings
Among 11 413 participants (493 infections), infection was associated with: leaving home for work (aOR 1.35 (1.11–1.64), aPAF 17%), public transport (aOR 1.27 (1.04–1.57), aPAF 12%), shopping once (aOR 1.83 (1.36–2.45)) vs. more than three times a week, indoor leisure (aOR 1.24 (1.02–1.51), aPAF 10%) and indoor hospitality (aOR 1.21 (0.98–1.48), aPAF 7%). We found no association for outdoor hospitality (1.14 (0.94–1.39), aPAF 5%) or outdoor leisure (1.14 (0.82–1.59), aPAF 1%).
Conclusion
Essential activities (work and public transport) carried the greatest risk and were the dominant contributors to infections. Non-essential indoor activities (hospitality and leisure) increased risk but contributed less. Outdoor activities carried no statistical risk and contributed to fewer infections. As countries aim to ‘live with COVID’, mitigating transmission in essential and indoor venues becomes increasingly relevant.
Cet article est un extrait de la recherche menée pour le Comité des droits de l’enfant de Hong Kong (HKCCR) qui examine la mise en œuvre à Hong Kong du droit des enfants d’être entendus dans les procédures les concernant, garanti par l’article 12 de la CIDE. Alors que les recherches commandées par le HKCCR s’é tendent à de multiples domaines, de l’éducation et la santé à l’élaboration de politiques constitutionnelles, ainsi qu’aux loisirs et à la culture notamment, cet article propose une analyse critique de la manière dont la voix des enfants est entendue dans le cadre juridique existant à Hong Kong. Les résultats de la recherche laissent penser que, bien que la législation relative au droit de l’enfant d’être entendu en vigueur à Hong Kong soit à bien des égards meilleure que dans d’autres États dont la législation a été examinée dans l’étude de la HKCCR, l’avis de des enfants est au mieux consultatif et, au pire, n’existe que dans les textes et non dans la pratique. Après avoir identifié les éléments qui font obstacle à une meilleure participation des enfants, cet article propose des recommandations afin d’améliorer la situation.
INTRODUCTION
This chapter will present the findings of research into how Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) has been implemented in Hong Kong’s legal sector. This research is part of a wider project commissioned by the Hong Kong Committee on Children’s Rights (HKCCR), a non-governmental organisation originally formed in 1992 to promote, advance and ensure the rights of the child in Hong Kong. The aim of the wider project was to establish an independent baseline study of the implementation of Article 12 across all relevant sectors in Hong Kong, from constitutional and high-level policy-making to health and education to matters of leisure, culture and built environment, amongst others.
People with lived experience of incarceration have higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to people without history of incarceration. Research conducted unethically in prisons and jails led to increased scrutiny of research to ensure the needs of those studied are protected. One consequence of increased restrictions on research with criminal-legal involved populations is reluctance to engage in research evaluations of healthcare for people who are incarcerated and people who have lived experience of incarceration. Ethical research can be done in partnership with people with lived experience of incarceration and other key stakeholders and should be encouraged. In this article, we describe how stakeholder engagement can be accomplished in this setting, and further, how such engagement leads to impactful research that can be disseminated and implemented across disciplines and communities. The goal is to build trust across the spectrum of people who work, live in, or are impacted by the criminal-legal system, with the purpose of moving toward health equity.
The Trial Innovation Network has established an infrastructure for single IRB review in response to federal policies. The Network’s single IRB (sIRBs) have successfully supported over 70 multisite studies via more than 800 reliance arrangements. This has generated several lessons learned that can benefit the national clinical research enterprise, as we work to improve the conduct of clinical trials. These lessons include distinguishing the roles of the single IRB from institutional Human Research Protections programs, establishing a consistent sIRB review model, standardizing collection of local context and supplemental, study-specific information, and educating and empowering lead study teams to support their sites.
Little is known about mental health problems of children and young people (CYP) involved with public and private law family court proceedings, and how these CYP fare compared to those not involved in these significant disruptions to family life.
Aims
This study examined records of depression/anxiety in CYP involved in public and private law proceedings using linked population-level data across Wales.
Method
Retrospective e-cohort study. We calculated the incidence of primary-care-recorded depression/anxiety among CYP involved in these proceedings and in a comparison group, using Poisson regression. Depression/anxiety outcomes following proceedings were evaluated using pairwise Cox regression, with age- and gender-matched controls of CYP who had no involvement with the courts.
Results
CYP in the public group had twice the risk of depression (adjusted incidence rate ratio aIRR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.9–2.6) and 20% higher risk of anxiety (aIRR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.0–1.5) relative to the comparison group. The private group had 60% higher risk of depression (aIRR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.7) and 30% higher risk of anxiety (aIRR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2–1.4). Following private law proceedings, CYP were more likely to have depression (hazard ratio HR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.7–2.1), and anxiety (HR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2–1.6) than the control group. Following public proceedings, CYP were more likely to have depression (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.7–2.5). Incidence of anxiety or depression following court proceedings was around 4%.
Conclusions
Findings highlight the vulnerability of CYP involved in family court proceedings and increased risk of depression and anxiety. Schools, health professionals, social and family support workers have a role to play in identifying needs and ensuring CYP receive appropriate support before, during and after proceedings.
De nombreux aspects du droit de la famille de Hong Kong demeurent inchangés depuis des années, malgré la nécessité d’une réforme mise en lumière par une jurisprudence abondante. Depuis plusieurs années maintenant, les tribunaux ont été saisi de contestations relatives à la nature exclusivement hétérosexuelle du mariage et cette année n’a pas été différente. Il semble désormais évident qu’une vaste contestation de la nature du mariage échouera devant les tribunaux, tandis qu’une lente réduction du privilège attaché à l’état matrimonial hétérosexuel se poursuivra, petit à petit, sur la base d’arguments antidiscriminatoires spécifiques à chaque cas. Comme les affaires portées devant les tribunaux cet année l’ont montré, la loi sur l’adoption est une nouvelle opportunité manquée de réforme, les enfants payant le prix fort en termes de délais inutiles pour aboutir à l’adoption. Le pouvoir judiciaire a peu de marge de manoeuvre pour que la loi demeure adaptée et pertinente sans franchir les limites d’un activisme judiciaire inadmissible. Le droit de la famille de Hong Kong a désespérément besoin d’une réforme législative globale, fondée sur des principes et des pratiques reconnues.
INTRODUCTION
This year's chapter on Hong Kong, like previous contributions, offers a review of recent developments in Hong Kong's family law in the absence of ‘grand plan’ legislative reform, and argues that, despite the ongoing best efforts of the judiciary to maintain the relevance of Hong Kong's family law, there is a desperate need for renewed engagement with the process of legislative reform in a number of key areas, with specific focus this year on marriage and adoption.
No one could deny that Hong Kong has had a difficult two years, with extensive civil rights protests starting in 2019, coupled in the past 12 months with the impact of COVID-19. Understandably, legislative reform of family law may not have been top of the agenda during these times. However, the fact is that there has been a lack of significant legislative innovation in family law for several years.
The issue of whether law should lead public opinion or vice versa is complex and well-traversed in jurisprudential debate, and not a subject that can be adequately addressed here.
Rapid whole genome sequencing (rapid WGS) is a powerful diagnostic tool that is becoming increasingly practical for widespread clinical use. However, protocols for its use are challenging to implement. A significant obstacle to clinical adoption is that laboratory certification requires an initial research development phase, which is constrained by regulations from returning results. Regulations preventing return of results have ethical implications in cases which might impact patient outcomes. Here, we describe our experience with the development of a rapid WGS research protocol, that balanced the requirements for laboratory-validated test development with the ethical needs of clinically relevant return of results.
The COVID-19 pandemic changed the clinical research landscape in America. The most urgent challenge has been to rapidly review protocols submitted by investigators that were designed to learn more about or intervene in COVID-19. International Review Board (IRB) offices developed plans to rapidly review protocols related to the COVID-19 pandemic. An online survey was conducted with the IRB Directors at Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) institutions as well as two focus groups. Across the CTSA institutions, 66% reviewed COVID-19 protocols across all their IRB committees, 22% assigned protocols to just one committee, and 10% created a new committee for COVID-19 protocols. Fifty-two percent reported COVID-19 protocols were reviewed much faster, 41% somewhat faster, and 7% at the same speed as other protocols. Three percent reported that the COVID-19 protocols were reviewed with much better quality, 32% reported slightly better quality, and 65% reported the reviews were of the same quality as similar protocols before the COVID-19 pandemic. IRBs were able to respond to the emergent demand for reviewing COVID-19 protocols. Most of the increased review capacity was due to extra effort by IRB staff and members and not changes that will be easily implemented across all research going forward.