We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The decline in fertility is one of the major problems worldwide that could affect family structure. Many studies have been conducted to assess attitudes toward fertility and childbearing around the world, but there’s a lack of research about that in Saudi Arabia (SA). The study aims to assess women’s attitudes toward fertility and childbearing in SA and to investigate its association with sociodemographic, medical, and psychological factors.
Objectives
Aim of the Study: The purpose of the study is to assess women’s attitudes toward fertility and childbearing in Saudi Arabia and to investigate its association with sociodemographic, medical and psychological variables.
Specific Objectives:
1. To assess women’s attitudes toward fertility and childbearing in Saudi Arabia.
2. To investigate association between attitudes toward childbearing with sociodemographic characteristics in Saudi Arabia.
3. To investigate association between attitudes toward childbearing with medical and psychiatric history in Saudi Arabia.
4. To investigate association between attitudes toward childbearing with the childbearing preferences in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
This cross-sectional study of a convenient sample of 2172 women in SA in Dec 2022 and Jan 2023. Data were collected through a survey link that contains:1)Sociodemographic data, 2) medical and psychiatric history, 3) childbearing preference and 4) the Arabic version of the Attitudes toward Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). Data were analyzed by SPSS 25 ;We described the variables in means ± SD or percentage as appropriate. Student’s t-test and ANOVA were performed to analyze differences between the components and background characteristics.
Results
Individuals in the age group of 18-25 years (25.54± 9.08, p<0.001), unmarried (25.23 ± 8.87, p<0.001), and diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder (24.76 ±9.51, p<0.002) scored lower in importance of future of childbearing. In terms of hindrance at present and childbearing preparation, individuals in the age group of 18-25 years (25.66 ± 8.66, p<0.001) (18.53 ± 5.08, p<0.001) respectively, unmarried (25.71± 8.58, p<0.001) (18.46 ± 5.08, p<0.001) respectively, and students (25.92 ± 8.82, p<0.001) (18.55 ± 5.15, p=0.001) respectively were more likely to score high. Participants who had not made a decision about having children (9.36±3.32, p<0.001) scored lower in the female identity domain.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that the younger age group (18-25 years) and those with psychiatric illnesses scored lower in the importance for future of childbearing compared to women of older age group (36-49 years ) and those without psychiatric illnesses. On the other hand, college students showed more concerns related to childbearing hindrance and preparation.
This study aims to assess the knowledge and awareness, and to identify the practice reflection of knowledge concerning Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) on hospital visitor’s daily life.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study, conducted in 2 tertiary referral hospitals in Riyadh Saudi Arabia, from February 2015 to February 2016. A total random sample of 305 hospital visitors consented to participate. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire consisting of questions regarding awareness and practice of measures to prevent the spread of infection.
Results:
Study showed that participants have a fair knowledge regarding the cause of MERS (N = 228; 74.8%). Nearly half of them (47%) stated that camels are the source of the spread of MERS. Approximately 70% of the participants preferred both sanitization and wearing facemasks as preventive measures for MERS. However, only 3.95% practiced not eating camel products, such as milk and meat.
Conclusions:
Although hospital visitors showed some knowledge and positive awareness in several aspects of MERS awareness, there are weak areas where knowledge and awareness were not up to recommended guidelines. Continued educational programs are needed to improve awareness and knowledge of all the public toward MERS-coronavirus infection. This study may assist in the development of future strategies on preventive measures of the disease.