To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The control of alcohol and other drugs (AOD) is an important feature of the global public policy landscape. There is widespread recognition that the ‘war on drugs’, rooted in international systems of drug control, has failed both on its own terms and because of the harms it has visited upon users and their communities. Although some states have moved towards liberalisation, the vast majority continue to heavily invest in punitive measures. Importantly, however, key ideas about drugs are coming under sustained pressure, and in some instances, beginning to break down, including the idea that drugs inevitably produce harms, including illness, injury and death, or that they produce other predictable, stable and consistent ‘effects’ (Fraser and Moore, 2011). There is evidence of this change in specific contexts including drug policy, health promotion and service provision. But what is happening in law courts? How are drugs being conceptualised in legal cases around the world? Scholars from a variety of disciplines have taken a keen interest in the ‘drug problem’, but there has been little scrutiny of how key cases in different jurisdictions have influenced the ways in which we understand, respond to and punish the use of various substances. The importance of such decisions extends beyond criminal matters and affects outcomes in a variety of legal spheres including immigration, welfare, family justice, education and employment law. Judging Drugs is the first book to chart the impact and significance of those cases in different parts of the world, and to consider how ideas about drugs are (or might be) changing across our courts. It thus comprises an important and distinctive addition to a body of scholarship that has sought to understand the ways in which drugs and ‘addiction’ have been subject to varying degrees of control and opprobrium. Importantly, contributors to this edited collection do not simply identify and summarise important legal cases from around the world. In this sense, the collection is not a ‘textbook’ of important case law. It is also not a textbook of cases with apparent precedent value.
Methadone maintenance therapy arose as a treatment for opiate use in the mid 1960s. At the time, neither drug use nor treatment for it were considered disabilities. When Vincent Dole, the Rockefeller Institute metabolic researcher who was one of the progenitors of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT), asked, ‘What kind of disablement does a drug produce?’ (Courtwright et al., 1989, p. 334), this was a prescient question.1 Dole’s team stabilised patient-subjects on methadone, hoping to displace reliance on shorter-acting opiates, and explored dosages that would enable ‘cooperative relationships with patients’ (Courtwright, et al., 1989, p. 336). Opposing detoxification and abstinence as the sole basis for treatment, Dole saw opioid use disorder as a metabolic condition that required ongoing pharmacological stability. Contrasting the stabilising effects of one opiate (methadone) to another (heroin), Dole emphasised that drugs should be judged in terms of their social effects – did they improve or undermine capacity for stable relationships with family members, treatment providers or employers? Did they produce ‘disablement’ or did they instead ‘enable’ capacities for productive citizenship? Such questions dominated the social contexts into which methadone maintenance was inserted. Making stable, productive citizens was adopted as the goal of methadone maintenance.
Supervised consumption sites (SCS) are spaces where people can use pre-acquired drugs under the supervision of trained staff who monitor for overdose and administer medical assistance, if necessary.1 By providing sterile drug use supplies, referrals to various services and education about safer injection practices, SCS function as harm reduction apparatuses for reducing overdose and the transmission of blood-borne infections like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) and other harms associated with drug use such as skin and soft tissue infections.2 While at least one unsanctioned SCS exists in the United States (Kral & Davidson, 2017), there are currently only three government-authorised sites in the country; two opened in 2021 in New York City and one opened in 2024 in Rhode Island. Another SCS was poised to open years earlier in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, until the US federal government sued Safehouse, the organisation set to manage the site, to prevent it from opening. The government argued that Safehouse would violate federal law if it opened an SCS because the US Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (1970) prohibits the operation of places where drugs are made or used illicitly.
The day after launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, in a public speech addressed to multiple audiences, Putin called for the ‘overthrow’ of the Ukrainian government, which he labelled a ‘gang of narcomany (‘drug addicts’) and neo-Nazis’ (Roth, 2022). We will return to the significance of this speech later; here we would add to the picture that after Russia’s initial invasion of Ukraine in 2014, in all territories under Russian occupation, opioid agonist therapy (OAT) programmes were immediately shut down, reflecting their status as being also banned in Russia.
This chapter provides multiple-choice questions designed to reinforce and expand your knowledge of substance use disorders and impulsive-compulsive disorders, including neurobiology of impulsivity and compulsivity, neurobiology of reward, mechanisms of drugs of abuse, treatments for substance use disorders, and treatments for impulsive-compulsive disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).
This case report presents the case of a 25-year-old woman who developed ketamine addiction following a single sub-anaesthetic dose of intranasal ketamine in a pilot study investigating intranasal racemic ketamine for acute suicidality. She had a history of depression, obsessive–compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorder and anorexia nervosa, and she had sporadically used alcohol and cannabis. Following the intervention, she reported a transient reduction in suicidal ideation but later sought illicit ketamine to recreate its calming effects on intrusive thoughts. Subsequently she also started abusing cocaine and 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC). Within weeks she had escalated to daily use, which led to financial distress, housing instability and a suicide attempt when access was cut off. Although she initially ceased use, she later relapsed into ketamine and cocaine addiction. This case highlights the addictive risk of ketamine, even in controlled settings. Given ketamine’s rising use in psychiatric treatment, careful screening, monitoring and awareness of addiction potential are essential. Future research should evaluate patient-specific risk factors and dosing strategies to minimise abuse liability.
Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) has risen among women globally and is disproportionately higher in prisons. In Indonesia, correctional facilities still lack any structured and evidence-based psychological therapy. To address this gap, we developed the Indonesia Substance Use Reduction for Female Therapy (Indo-SURFT).
Methods:
A single-arm unblinded design with a 3-month follow-up was conducted among incarcerated women with MUD. Participants completed 12 sessions over six weeks. Assessments included user perception ratings, Addiction Severity Index (ASI), Visual Analog Scale for craving, University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale, Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20), and WHO Quality-of-Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF).
Results:
A total of 33 incarcerated women with MUD participated and the median age was 35 (21–57). All of the participants had complete attendance during the 6-week program. By week 12, participants rated the Indo-SURFT module as useful (Mdiff = 0.484, 95%CI [0.235, 0.732], p < 0.001, d = 0.482). Employment-related ASI scores improved post-intervention (B = −0.076, p = 0.002) and at follow-up (B = −0.106, p = 0.004). Psychiatric domain of ASI remained stable post-intervention but increased after follow-up (B = 0.200, p ≤ 0.001). Craving declined post-treatment but rose at follow-up (B = 1.247, p = 0.036). SRQ-20 increased over time, while WHOQOL-BREF declined.
Conclusions:
Indo-SURFT is tolerable and feasible for women with MUD in incarceration. Participants highly rated the module and delivery. The module demonstrates initial improvement in functional domain and curbs craving level during treatment. Maintenance sessions may be required to fully maintain and enhance improvements. These findings support Indo-SURFT’s as a potential intervention but requires further multisite investigation to enhance generalizability.
Every day, judges determine vital questions about 'addiction', 'drugs', and the rights of those who use them. Despite the law's crucial role in handling drug 'problems', and in shaping drug practices, effects and outcomes, drug scholars have often overlooked case law. In a rapidly changing drug policy landscape, how is the law managing drug effects and harms, stigma, addiction, agency and responsibility? Why do we regulate drugs? Are drug offenders responsible for their actions? Is drug use a disability? Is drug treatment a human right? Do drugs cause harm? And might drug law itself be harmful? Authors in this volume take a variety of approaches to these questions and more. Drawing on critical theory, all consider new ways of thinking about 'drug problems'. This vital new collection enables a deeper, critical understanding of how the law 'works' to shape knowledge about, as well as 'judge', drug use and its effects.
Sexual minority (lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer and other non-heterosexual) people experience significant disparities in addiction problems compared with heterosexual people.
Aims
We aimed to answer the question, what are the barriers and facilitators to accessing drug/alcohol addiction treatment services for sexual minority adults?’.
Method
A systematic review was conducted by searching Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Sociological Abstracts for any English-language primary research article (qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods) relevant to the study aims, from inception up to 18 April 2025. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT-2018). Barriers and facilitators were categorised into ‘service-related’ and ‘patient-related’ dimensions of accessibility, and synthesised narratively.
Results
We screened 3282 abstracts, with full-text review of 238 articles; 62 studies met the inclusion criteria. Common service-related barriers included explicit harassment, discrimination, violence or abuse toward sexual minority people in services and lack of expertise or ‘culturally competent’ provision for their specific addiction problems. Facilitators included affirming, non-judgemental staff attitudes and sexual minority-specific treatment or outreach services. Patient-related barriers included ambivalence around drug/alcohol use and a fear of stigma (e.g. around sexualised drug use). Facilitators included signposting to services via community networks or peer advocates, and allowing patients to set their own treatment goals.
Conclusions
Although barriers and facilitators vary across global contexts and time periods, both qualitative and quantitative research highlighted similar key issues. Implementing practical changes to address these may improve sexual minority people’s access to addiction services, reducing the burden of addiction-related health inequity for this community.
The ’Introduction’ lays the intellectual foundation for the book by situating mind-altering substances within the broader arc of human cultural, neurological, and technological evolution. It argues that altered states of consciousness — whether chemically, behaviourally, or digitally induced — are not peripheral but central to the human experience. The chapter outlines how the search for transcendence, novelty, and meaning has driven innovations in medicine, ritual, and technology across millennia. It introduces the concept of ’experiential adaptation’ to describe how societies continually modify consciousness in response to environmental, social, and symbolic pressures. The introduction also maps out the interdisciplinary methodology of the book, drawing from anthropology, neuroscience, history, digital media studies, and future forecasting. It prepares the reader to navigate a narrative that stretches from Palaeolithic natural and artificial, healthy and pathological, sacred and simulated.
Recent studies suggest an association between sympathies for violent protest and terrorism, and major depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and psychiatric disorders in subgroups of radicalised people and in lone-actor terrorists.
Aims
The aim of this study is to identify and analyse all documented terrorist attacks in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD), where the motive for terrorism is questioned due to suspected mental health issues.
Method
This study is based on a semi-quantitative, epidemiological analysis of all incidents from 1970 to the first half of 2021, as reported in the GTD. Incidents in which the act of terrorism was questionable because of alleged mental illness were included. Temporal factors, location, target type, attack and weapon type, perpetrator type and number of casualties were collated.
Results
One hundred and two incidents in the period 1970–2020 and five incidents in 2021 were studied. The majority occurred in the period 2011–2020. The incidents resulted in a total of 99 fatal and 217 non-fatal injuries. Twenty-nine perpetrators died during the attacks.
The majority of the attacks occurred in the USA, followed by France and the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Armed assaults were the most frequently identified attack type (67%).
In North America, the incidence was as high as 8.2 and 3.4% of the total number of terrorist attacks in the periods 2001–2010 and 2021, respectively. Most of the perpetrators acted as lone actors. Five assailants were detained in a psychiatric facility after the judicial probe, 18 were convicted and 9 had not been sentenced.
Conclusions
The possible relation between terrorism and mental illness or addiction is a recent phenomenon in the GTD. The prototypical case consists of a lone actor suffering from an assumed mental illness committing an armed assault. Only a minority of perpetrators were unable to stand trial in this series.
Reinforcement and addiction are commonly attributed to dopamine and its release along the pathway from the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens. This chapter traces the historical development of research linking dopamine to reinforcement, reward prediction error, and incentive salience. It then evaluates the evidence for and against the dopamine theory of addiction and discusses challenges in testing this theory in human studies. The chapter concludes with a speculative exploration of potential dopamine-based treatments for addiction.
Substance use has consistently been linked with cognitive impairments. However, most previous studies have focused on highly selective samples of individuals with chronic substance use disorders and have typically relied solely on self-reports. The associations between recreational use patterns of single or multiple substances and cognitive functioning in representative samples remain unclear.
Methods
We measured over 100 substances and their metabolites over the past 3 months in 850 young adults (48.6% female, Mage = 24.4) from a community-based cohort, using quantitative hair analysis. We assessed sustained attention, working memory, declarative memory, and a total cognitive performance index using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. We regressed cognition on hair substance concentrations, adjusting for sex, household socioeconomic status, migration background, education, gaming experience, and self-reported daily tobacco and alcohol use.
Results
In their hair samples, 386 (45.5%) participants tested positive for at least one psychotropic substance other than alcohol and nicotine. Higher hair concentrations of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Cohen’s d = 0.40) and codeine (d = 0.22) were associated with lower sustained attention; higher concentrations of ketamine (d = 0.59) with worse declarative memory. Higher hair concentrations of cocaine and a higher polysubstance use severity index (PSUSI) were associated with both reduced attention (cocaine: d = 0.21; PSUSI: d = 0.30) and declarative memory (cocaine: d = 0.20; PSUSI: d = 0.29).
Conclusions
In this community sample of young adults, substance use was highly prevalent and associated with reduced cognitive performance, with small-to-moderate effect sizes. Cognitive consequences of recreational substance use may have been previously underestimated.
“Dual disorders” (DD) refers to the co-occurrence of addiction and other mental health conditions, which often interact and complicate care. Despite scientific evidence showing shared brain mechanisms, current diagnostic systems treat them separately, leading to fragmented treatment and stigma. The World Association on Dual Disorders urges adopting “dual disorders” as a unified term to improve clarity, care integration, and outcomes.
This chapter challenges the conventional wisdom of how users of social media platforms such as Instagram, X, or TikTok pay for service access. It argues that rather than merely exchanging data for services, users unknowingly barter their attention, emotions, and cognitive resources – mental goods that corporations exploit through technologically managed systems like targeted advertising and habit-forming design. The chapter explores how these transactions are facilitated not by legal contracts but by code, which allows social media companies to extract value in ways that traditional legal conceptual frameworks cannot capture. It further highlights the negative externalities of these exchanges, such as cognitive impairments and mental health issues, framing them as pollution byproducts of the attention economy. By examining both the visible and hidden dimensions of this technologically mediated exchange, the chapter calls for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that govern our interactions with digital platforms rather than rushing to propose new legal solutions.
Narratives and frames have shaped the overdose crisis since its early stages. Efforts to control knowledge about the role of opioids in chronic pain have influenced clinical guidelines and prescribing behaviour. Dominant narratives shape policy by influencing how problems are defined, and which solutions are considered appropriate. A more nuanced understanding of how framing shapes interactions among stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, advocacy groups, industry, educators, and regulators, can clarify these dynamics. Engaging multiple perspectives, rather than relying on a single dominant narrative, offers a more effective path for addressing complex public health emergencies such as the overdose crisis.
Cortical thickness reductions associated with chronic methamphetamine use exhibit a non-uniform spatial distribution across brain regions. A potential neurobiological mechanism underlying for this heterogeneous pattern may involve the structural and functional organization of cortical connectivity networks, which could mediate the propagation of neuroanatomical alterations. Here, we aimed to explore how brain network architecture constrains cortical thickness alterations and their clinical relevance.
Methods
The 3D-T1 images were acquired from 139 patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) and 119 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. We first characterized distributed cortical thinning patterns in patients with MUD, then evaluated the relationships between regional atrophy and (1) multimodal nodal centrality measures (structural, morphological, and functional) and (2) atrophy profiles of structural connected neighbors. Individual network-weighted cortical abnormality maps were used to identify distinct MUD biotypes and related to clinical features through k-means clustering and partial least squares regression.
Results
Cortical thinning patterns demonstrated significant associations with nodal centrality across all modalities, as well as cortical thinning of connected neighbors revealing a network-dependent atrophy architecture. Fronto-temporal regions emerged as critical epicenters, showing both high nodal centrality and strong correlations with connected neighbors’ thinning severity. We found that the individual differences in network-weighted cortical abnormality corresponded to clinical symptom variability, and distinguished two MUD biotypes associated with drug use.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that cortical thinning in MUD is influenced by the brain connectome architecture, providing a mechanistic framework for understanding individual variability in addiction progression.
This ethnographic study reassesses the role of opium in Iran’s economic landscape, challenging dominant narratives that frame opium users as unproductive and burdensome. Based on fieldwork conducted between 2010 and 2018 in the Pars Special Economic Energy Zone (PSEEZ), the research examines how construction workers use opium to endure and enhance productivity under extreme environmental and economic pressures. It critiques a century-long anti-opium discourse—rooted in the Iranian Constitutional Movement (1905–1911) and perpetuated through shifting regimes of criminalization and medicalization—that consistently associates opium use with economic idleness. Through autoethnographic reflection and archival analysis, the article first outlines this dominant discourse, then constructs a counternarrative in which laborers deliberately integrate opium into their daily practices to sustain bodily performance and contribute to Iran’s petroindustrial expansion. Described as “narco-nomad science,” this practice enables the formation of resilient working bodies and repositions opium as an active agent within circuits of capitalist production. Drawing on actor-network theory and assemblage thinking, the study foregrounds the material agency of opium. It offers new analytical frameworks for understanding its role in labor, infrastructure, and the political economy of the PSEEZ.
Howard CH Khoe, National Psychiatry Residency Programme, Singapore,Cheryl WL Chang, National University Hospital, Singapore,Cyrus SH Ho, National University Hospital, Singapore
Chapter 28 covers the topic of opioid use disorder. Through a case vignette with topical MCQs for consolidation of learning, readers go through the management of a patient with opioid use disorder from from first presentation to subsequent complications of the condition and its treatment. Topics covered include symptoms and diagnosis of acute intoxication and withdrawal symptoms of opioids and management including that of use in pregnant women.