To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines how achievement books produced by Egyptian state institutions have narrated and re-narrated the 1952 revolution. These books were centrally published by the Information Department, a crucial yet seldom studied organ in the emerging Ministry of Culture and National Guidance, as well as public relations units across different ministries. After a brief institutional history of the Ministry of Culture and National Guidance as a whole, in which I demonstrate how ‘culture’ and ‘media’ were originally intertwined in administrative terms, I argue that the state’s achievements were narrated according to a changing conception of the revolution between 1954 and 1970. This rhetoric cemented a distinctive version of history among Egyptian bureaucrats, in which long lists of achievements came to articulate the bureaucratic corps’ contributions to the revolution. Moreover, it aimed to counter colonial propaganda via a systematic presentation of ‘the true Egypt’ in numerous European languages. In short, achievement books recorded, disseminated, and embodied the revolution’s accomplishments for a domestic and an international audience.
Edited by
Latika Chaudhary, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California,Tirthankar Roy, London School of Economics and Political Science,Anand V. Swamy, Williams College, Massachusetts
Trade and finance together formed the third-largest livelihood type in colonial India. These two activities were interdependent because banks and moneylenders mainly financed commodity trade. The combined share of the two activities rose significantly in national income in the early twentieth century. Behind this growth, the expansion of transport infrastructure and an open economy with few barriers to foreign trade were responsible. It was not, however, a business without friction. A great deal of the historical scholarship around these activities asks how environmental risks, information asymmetry, law and politics shaped the decisions of merchants, lenders and firms, as this chapter shows.
Despite years of efforts to combat disinformation, we remain far from a satisfactory set of solutions. The rise of generative AI, which enables the creation of highly credible fake content at scale, suggests that the problem is likely to grow even more severe. Lessons from the recent pandemic also call for a reconsideration of how disinformation should be addressed. This paper proposes a new approach that focuses not only on regulating everyone who spreads false information, but also on those who hold epistemic power – individuals with the capacity to shape what others know or believe. Such a strategy has the potential to move the debate forward, as it avoids the most common objection to disinformation regulation: the fear of widespread censorship. The paper argues that an individual’s epistemic position can justifiably differentiate their legal duties, and that those who possess epistemic power should bear corresponding legal – specifically, criminal – responsibility for the abuse of that power in spreading disinformation.
Religious belief systems are often marked by internal dissonance. Mitigating this dissonance can lead to surprising religious phenomena, including blood libels, scapegoating, religious violence, the worship of saints and martyrs, asceticism, austerities, as well as processions, fasting, and clowning. In this study, Ariel Glucklich provides a new approach to understanding how religious actions emerge in the context of belief systems. Providing an innovative psychological and social understanding of the causes that stimulate believers to action, he examines a range of religious phenomena in India, Israel, Austria, Italy, and the United States. Glucklich's new theory enables recognition of the patterns that account for the full complexity of actions inspired by religious beliefs and systems. His systematic comparison of actions across traditional boundaries offers a novel approach to cause and effect in comparative religion and religious studies more broadly. Glucklich's book also generates new questions regarding a universal phenomenon that has escaped notice up to now.
This introductory chapter defines data science as a field focused on collecting, storing, and processing data to derive meaningful insights for decision-making. It explores data science applications across diverse sectors including finance, healthcare, politics, public policy, urban planning, education, and libraries. The chapter examines how data science relates to statistics, computer science, engineering, business analytics, and information science, while introducing computational thinking as a fundamental skill. It discusses the explosive growth of data (the 3Vs: velocity, volume, variety) and essential skills for data scientists, including statistical knowledge, programming abilities, and data literacy. The chapter concludes by addressing critical ethical concerns around privacy, bias, and fairness in data science practice.
This chapter provides for a summary overview of some of the great movements in economic science. We discuss theory falsification and the historical role of the observable in economics. We provide for a brief overview of behavioural and experimental economics, as well as computational and neuroeconomics. We conclude the chapter with some ideas on the value of information in the price process.
The Communist Party is building a digitally capable state to remain at the vanguard of social and political development in China. CPC leaders are advancing digitalization forcefully throughout the governance and economic system through various policy initiatives. Informatization serves both better governance and public service, by overcoming previous bottlenecks and spatial challenges in administration. It also enhances the party state’s surveillance and monitoring capabilities. The CPC’s goals for China’s future under its continued rule require a digital infrastructure and economy that is both efficacious and subject to the Party’s control. To this end, the CPC is building out a comprehensive governance architecture for cyberspace, including the world’s most expansive data regulatory regime. The current leadership regards these digital capabilities as a key part of its comprehensive governance model that will enable the CPC to implement its domestic and international vision for China in the coming years.
This introductory chapter defines data science as a field focused on collecting, storing, and processing data to derive meaningful insights for decision-making. It explores data science applications across diverse sectors including finance, healthcare, politics, public policy, urban planning, education, and libraries. The chapter examines how data science relates to statistics, computer science, engineering, business analytics, and information science, while introducing computational thinking as a fundamental skill. It discusses the explosive growth of data (the 3Vs: velocity, volume, variety) and essential skills for data scientists, including statistical knowledge, programming abilities, and data literacy. The chapter concludes by addressing critical ethical concerns around privacy, bias, and fairness in data science practice.
What causes Indonesian to lenite word-final /k/, American English to lenite word-final /t/, and Spanish to lenite word-final /s/? This article shows that all three observed lenition patterns can be motivated using a single principle: languages preferentially lenite segments that provide relatively low informativity compared to the amount of informativity those segments carry in other languages. In a comparison of a diverse sample of seven languages from the LDC CALLHOME and CALLFRIEND corpora, Indonesian /k/, American English /t/, and Spanish /s/ are found to have the lowest informativity, predicting that they would be more likely to be affected by sound change processes. In a subsequent regression-based corpus study, low informativity predicted the propensity of word-final lenition of all obstruents in American English after phonetic and phonological factors were controlled for. This article therefore provides a partial solution to the famous actuation problem (Weinreich et al. 1968) with respect to the actuation of lenition processes.
The failure to make LAI the default route over the same oral when both are available is a lost opportunity to improve outcomes for people with schizophrenia. A striking example is the lost opportunity to improve life expectancy. A sophisticated pharmacoepidemiologic study from Sweden matched antipsychotic prescriptions with mortality rates and found that receiving an LAI version improved longevity by about 30% compared to its equivalent oral counterpart. Published a decade ago, it seems to have had little impact within US mental health services. This paper attempts to explain some of the reasons for complacency in adapting LAIs as a preferred approach for oral that have an LAI option available. Hypotheses include (1) not appreciating the importance of accurate information to guide present and future treatment recommendations, (2) considering LAIs primarily for adherence interventions rather than their more general benefit as a superior information platform, (3) how fear of disclosing nonadherence is a primary cause of misinformation, and (4) complacency with status quo acceptance of misinformation without fully appreciating how it harms future outcomes. The outcome benefits that come from changing from the oral to the LAI, if available, will continue. Advances in formulation technology have greatly improved the safety and flexibility of recent LAIs compared to earlier formulations, and formulation advances will allow for additional antipsychotics currently limited to oral formulation to expand to having an LAI version readily available.
An immediacy condition is elaborated. It is argued that a Kantian intuition is immediate both in the sense that it is direct in its way of representing and in the sense that it is presentational in acquainting the perceiver with its object. It can thus be said to be both of and as of, in present-day terminology. It is representation of, or referential, by virtue of its “intuitive marks,” which are singular, and it is representation as of, or attributive, by virtue of its “predicates of intuition,” which are general. This has been overlooked by most Kant commentators. It may also have contributed to the epistemic downgrading of perceptions that has been ascribed to Kant. It is argued that an empirical intuition hooks on to tropes in the perceived scene by way of the intuitive marks, and that there is also perceptual attribution of proper and common sensibles to the concrete particulars by means of it. Finally, it is discussed how information that is carried by intuitions can be “unpacked” and thought through concepts in cognition of objects “in the proper sense.”
In item response theory (IRT), the conventional latent trait scale ($\theta $) is inherently arbitrary, lacking a fixed unit or origin and often tied to specific population distributional assumptions (e.g., standard normal). This limits the direct comparability and interpretability of scores across different tests, populations, or model estimation methods. This article introduces the “bit scale,” a novel metric transformation for unidimensional IRT scores derived from fundamental principles of information theory, specifically surprisal and entropy. Bit scores are anchored to the properties of the test items rather than the test-taker population. This item-based anchoring ensures the scale’s invariance to population assumptions and provides a consistent metric for comparing latent trait levels. We illustrate the utility of the bit scale through empirical examples: demonstrating consistent scoring when fitting models with different $\theta $ scale assumptions, and using anchor items to directly link scores from different test administrations. A simulation study confirms the desirable statistical properties (low bias and accurate standard errors) of Maximum Likelihood-estimated bit scores and their robustness to extreme scores. The bit scale offers a theoretically grounded, interpretable, and comparable metric for reporting and analyzing IRT-based assessment results. Software implementations in R (bitscale) and Python (IRTorch) are available and practical implications are discussed.
Using ethnographic material of new parents’ encounters with welfare workers during the process of claiming and receipt of universal family entitlements in Denmark and Romania, this article proposes the concept of bureaucratic translation. Drawing on Latourian conceptual foundations, we show that the communication of bureaucratic information is not only symbolically loaded, but invariably in need of ‘translation’. We highlight five interrelated processes of meaning-making parents have to engage in. Despite the universalism of entitlements, parents experience information offered by welfare workers as specialised knowledge that they should not legitimately be expected to have good command of. Their contestation stems from the tension between the helping ethos of universalist programmes and the inadequacies and insufficiencies of bureaucratic information offered. Bureaucratic translation illuminates the complexities of ‘learning costs’ underpinning administrative burden from citizens’ perspective, flagging difficulties even for the bureaucratically least challenging social programmes.
Information is a key variable in International Relations, underpinning theories of foreign policy, inter-state cooperation, and civil and international conflict. Yet IR scholars have only begun to grapple with the consequences of recent shifts in the global information environment. We argue that information disorder—a media environment with low barriers to content creation, rapid spread of false or misleading material, and algorithmic amplification of sensational and fragmented narratives—will reshape the practice and study of International Relations. We identify three major implications of information disorder on international politics. First, information disorder distorts how citizens access and evaluate political information, creating effects that are particularly destabilizing for democracies. Second, it damages international cooperation by eroding shared focal points and increasing incentives for noncompliance. Finally, information disorder shifts patterns of conflict by intensifying societal cleavages, enabling foreign influence, and eroding democratic advantages in crisis bargaining. We conclude by outlining an agenda for future research.
Chapter 4 examines the origins of modern territoriality in British India and surrounding regions. The cause was a shift in the disposition of colonial governance towards information, as officials dealt with a crisis of knowledge about Indian society and politics. The ryotwari settlement is a well-studied example of this shift in dispositions as reflected in revenue policy, but the rapid expansion of surveying activity starting in the 1790s in the Madras Presidency, especially including Colin Mackenzie’s survey of the state of Mysore (1799–1810), is another example. This explanation is contrasted with other possible explanations based on the diffusion of practices from Europe, or on the maximization of revenue. Finally, it is shown how, once the surveying of boundaries was well established in India, the British began using this practice outside of India proper, and how the emergence of modern territoriality from Persia to Siam depended on the Anglo-Indian surveying practice.
How we use dialogue to develop character and advance plot. Overcoming anxiety about dialogue; the dangers of avoiding dialogue. Reported speech lacks energy; dialogue enlivens a scene. Dialogue reveals character, indicates relationship and conveys information, but has to appear authentic. Strong dialogue combines multiple functions. Punctuating and attributing dialogue; adverbs qualifying tone.
The need to share news and information and circulate ideas about politics, commerce, and other issues, together with an accompanying desire to control how others circulated them, led British officials, American colonists, Native Americans, and people of African descent to develop overlapping and competing pathways of communication. Through formal structures such as the imperial Post Office and military communications, and through informal networks of individual connections, they attempted not only to connect with others but also to shape and control narratives about the world around them, and in particular brewing controversies over continental diplomacy and imperial policies. Their communication took three forms: oral – the spoken word was available to all; written – mostly in the form of manuscript correspondence; and print – which encompassed official announcements, pamphlets, and periodicals such as newspapers. Communication proved vital to all the inhabitants of North America in the 1760s and 1770s.
Health insurance does not work well when individuals have more information about illness than the insurer. Two problems arise as a consequence of this information gap. Moral hazard, which arises when individuals know more about their current needs than the insurer, generates an overutilization of care services. Adverse selection, caused by insureds having more information about future risk than insurers, leads high-risk individuals to buy high coverage (at a high premium) and low-risk individuals to buy lower coverage than optimal. This chapter covers these market failures and presents some evidence and thoughts about policies that have been used to reduce their negative effect, such as cost-sharing for dealing with moral hazard, and mandates and cross-subsidies for buying high coverage. I end by arguing that dealing with selection should not be a top priority.
The double-distortion argument holds that income taxation is more efficient than redistribution through changes in legal rules because a change in a legal rule distorts both the market to which the rule applies and, by altering incomes of market participants, the labor market as well. The argument succeeds only if it is possible to achieve the same distributive outcomes with the income tax as with changes to legal rules. This is not the case, however, because tax authorities cannot obtain information regarding the extent of the surplus available for redistribution without altering legal rules in individual markets and observing whether the effect is inframarginal (in which case there is surplus available for redistribution) or marginal (in which case there is not). This point is illustrated using the Ayres and Talley model of Coasean bargaining with divided entitlements.
Australia’s World Heritage-listed Great Barrier Reef experiences cumulative impacts from diverse activities, including regional catchment-sourced water pollution and the impacts of climate change. Regulating these threats engages a wide range of laws for intervention, which have been influenced by a regulatory mechanism for information – a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) undertaken a decade ago at the request of UNESCO. This chapter explores how the strategic assessment and associated interventions influence impacts from two major activities that contribute to water pollution and climate change – cattle grazing and coal mining. It shows that regulatory SEA can provide for entrenching and integrating ongoing information collection, analysis, and sharing. Moreover, SEA can directly influence diverse regulatory interventions to address cumulative impacts. It can link the functions of information and intervention, two of the regulatory functions advanced by this book’s CIRCle Framework. At the same time, opportunities remain to build stronger links between interventions for water quality and climate adaptation, and between climate change mitigation interventions and the Reef context.