To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To map the spread of research on legumes, including beans, peas and other pulses; to identify research gaps and opportunities relating to the use of legumes for improved human nutrition, health and environmental outcomes; and to develop a novel method for clarifying research priorities.
Design:
Prospective mapping review, identifying and mapping ongoing research (2019–2023) across the value chain.
Setting:
UK.
Participants/sample:
Academic research studies in three databases.
Results:
Fifty ongoing research projects were identified, revealing a focus on the two ends of the value chain: production (twenty-one projects) and consumption (twenty-one projects). Only four projects encompassed the entire value chain from producer to consumer. Research on production includes the role of legumes in crop rotations for soil health and reduced fertiliser use, productivity interventions and improved breeds. Research on consumption includes dietary and health outcomes, predominantly cardiometabolic impacts, and legumes as an alternative protein source. Few projects focused on the middle of the value chain (four projects on product development) with none focused on processing, food service or retail.
Conclusions:
Further interdisciplinary projects, linking producers to consumers and with a greater focus on middle-chain actors, are needed. The food processing/manufacturing, food service and retail sectors hold significant power in food systems practice and governance. They play a crucial role in transitioning to a healthier and more sustainable food system. Understanding the drivers and barriers for these food systems actors in increasing production and consumption of beans, peas and pulses is required to inform future food policy and practice.
Promoting a ‘timely’ diagnosis is a global policy directive.
Aims
This review adopts an intersectional approach, visually mapping the existing literature to highlight gaps in the evidence base on barriers and facilitators to dementia diagnosis.
Method
A systematic approach was undertaken, following the PRISMA guidelines, updating previous reviews. The literature search was conducted on PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete and Scopus. In line with mapping review methodology, we report the current state of the literature by describing the number of studies that outline barriers and facilitators to seeking help for a dementia diagnosis, split by social categorisation.
Results
On the 7 June 2024, a total of 45 studies were identified. Our mapping demonstrated the majority of studies were derived from high-income countries and did not specify whether they were exploring barriers and facilitators through a specific social lens. Ethnicity was one of the few social categories where a range of evidence was reported. Other categories, such as socioeconomic status, gender and sexual orientation, received limited research attention.
Conclusions
Our mapping review suggests the large body of work within this field tends to treat people with dementia and their carers as homogenous and androgenous groups. To better inform this key policy directive, studies are needed that explore the influence of social determinants on people’s experiences of seeking a dementia diagnosis. Such work would create a richer, more nuanced evidence base that better elicits ways of addressing inequalities and inequities that arise at this key stage of people’s dementia care journey.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.