To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We assessed the association between voluntary polymerase chain reaction testing of travellers and reported infection rates in the Ogasawara Islands compared with those in several other Tokyo islands. The implementation of polymerase chain reaction testing over a 2-year period was evaluated. Between September 2020 and September 2022, 38,943 of 45,900 travellers to the Ogasawara Islands underwent pre-travel polymerase chain reaction testing, with a notable increase in uptake during states of emergency. Ogasawara reported 385 positive coronavirus disease 2019 cases, with no hospitalizations or severe cases among residents, in contrast to the higher infection and hospitalization rates in Tokyo. Pre-boarding polymerase chain reaction tests were associated with lower reported infection rates in this island setting. These findings suggest that combining pre-travel testing with local mitigation measures, including case isolation systems, may help safeguard the communities of small, geographically isolated islands. These results may inform public health preparedness and response strategies for future infectious disease outbreaks.
To estimate illness incidence or prevalence from wastewater data, modelling approaches may benefit from incorporating faecal shedding parameters. We systematically searched PubMed and a public repository on shedding data and included 33 studies that met at least one of our objectives. Among 32 studies, the proportion of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with detectable virus in stool ranged from 18 to 100%, with a pooled estimate of 54% (95% CI: 52–56%). Stratification by four clinical severity categories, ranging from asymptomatic to critically ill, showed no significant differences among categories (p-value = 0.49). The proportion of individuals with detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in stool was higher in children (61%) than in adults (53%; p-value = 0.02). In half of the individuals who initially shed the virus in stool, it remained detectable for an estimated 22 days post-symptom onset. Three studies documented viral load kinetics, indicating a peak between days 3 and 9. Twenty-five studies reported maximum shedding durations ranging from 2 to 12 weeks. Our review summarizes the frequency, dynamics, and duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding in stool and may serve as a valuable foundation for modelling efforts involving faecal shedding indicators.
A previous study by our research group identified psychomotor and neurofunctional impairments following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study continues that investigation, aiming to evaluate whether these impairments persisted over time, as part of the broader characterisation of long COVID. Moreover, it was explored potential correlations with variables such as age, blood type, symptoms, and medical care.
Methods:
From an initial pool of 214 subjects, 30 post-COVID-19 participants and 30 healthy controls were selected after strict exclusion criteria. The assessments protocol included eight psychomotor tests – Fine Motor Development (Diadochokinesia, Puppets, Fan, and Paper) and Balance (Immobility, Static Balance on One Foot, Feet in Line, and Persistence) – as well as three cognitive screening tasks from the Mini-Mental State Examination: Episodic Memory After Distracters, Verbal Fluency, and Clock tests. Evaluations were performed at three time points: baseline (post-COVID-19), 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Participants were stratified by age (18–30, 31–45, and 46–64 years), symptoms profile, medical care, and blood type.
Results:
COVID-19 induced psychomotor and neurofunctional sequelae lasting at least 24 weeks post-infection. These impairments were more pronounced and persistent in the 31–45-years age group, while memory-related impairments were more evident in the 18–30 age group. Body pain, coryza, and sore throat were key symptoms linked to long-term sequelae. Rh-negative blood type was suggested as a potential risk factor.
Conclusion:
The findings support that long COVID included sustained psychomotor and neurofunctional sequelae, premature senescence, and associations with specific clinical and biological variables.
After the Zero COVID policy ended on December 7, 2022, ~90% of mainland Chinese were infected in a COVID-19 wave. This systematic review synthesized research estimating excess mortality during that wave in mainland China. We searched seven databases in May 2024 and updated our search in July–August 2025. Peer-reviewed research (Chinese or English), published since January 1, 2023, estimating excess deaths in the COVID-19 wave post-Zero-COVID was included. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Two authors independently conducted abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Seven articles were included. Two studies analysed the death records of a town and a district in Shanghai, estimating the excess mortality rates of 153.6% and 174.3%, respectively. Using indirect methods, four studies estimated national excess mortality (range: 0.71–1.87 million). Another study estimated excess mortality in Taiyuan. Studies used diverse methods to estimate excess deaths, resulting in widely varying and uncertain estimates. Choice of reference period, seasonality, and other factors affect expected mortality estimates.
Post-COVID condition (PCC) describes new or worsening symptoms that develop after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection and are persistent for months without alternative explanations. Common PCC symptoms include post-exertional malaise, fatigue, breathlessness, cough, dizziness, “brain fog,” and gastrointestinal symptoms, and they may occur in upwards of 10% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The physical, cognitive, and mental health sequalae seen in post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) are also common in PCC, particularly in COVID-19 patients that have survived critical illness. The pathophysiology of PCC remains poorly understood. Patients’ symptoms should be managed aggressively; management has significant overlap with the treatment approach to PICS patients. Dedicated PCC clinics or combined PICS/PCC clinics should include specific expertise in the diagnosis and management of symptoms relating to COVID-19, including fatigue, dyspnea, exertional intolerance, GI discomfort, psychological sequelae, and cognitive dysfunction, and actively collaborate with an interdisciplinary team of clinicians and staff with PCC expertise.
The activity of respiratory viruses (RVs) displays large variability in tropical regions, posing challenges for public health response strategies. Data from most RVs in south-eastern Mexico remain limited, particularly in the Yucatan Peninsula, the largest tourism hub in the country. This retrospective study analyses the regional epidemiology of RVs in Merida, the largest city in the region, using laboratory test data from a local hospital (January 2018–April 2024). Test results of 143292 RVs were collected, including 121976 for SARS-CoV-2, 19355 for influenza A and B viruses, and 1961 for 17 distinct RVs. We found that non-SARS-CoV-2 RVs circulated year-round, with higher activity in autumn and spring, while SARS-CoV-2 peaked in summer and winter. Influenza A virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza B virus reached their highest activity in autumn, earlier than in other regions of Mexico. Human metapneumovirus peaked during autumn-winter. Rhinovirus/enterovirus and parainfluenza showed year-round activity, with peaks in autumn and spring. Other coronaviruses were more frequent during winter-spring. In post-pandemic years (2022–2023), adenovirus outbreaks emerged, as well as an increased prevalence of non-SARS-CoV-2 RV co-infections. This study highlights the need for region-specific public health strategies, including optimized vaccination schedules, such as for influenza A virus, and enhanced diagnostic surveillance.
We estimated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of second monovalent and bivalent booster vaccines containing Omicron BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 and the protection conferred by natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Luxembourg. We conducted a test-negative case–control study among residents aged 60 years or older by integrating national socio-demographic, COVID-19 vaccination, and testing data, achieving full population coverage. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated absolute and relative VE of monovalent and bivalent boosters and natural immunity from prior infection. Our analysis included 5,390 test-positive cases and 11,048 test-negative controls matched by week of testing between September 2022 and April 2023. Absolute VE for monovalent and bivalent boosters decreased from 64.8% and 66.6% in the first month to 1.5% and 16.5% after 5–6 months, respectively. The bivalent was superior to the monovalent booster only in individuals without natural immunity (relative VE 25.7%, 95% confidence interval 11.4%; 37.7%). Natural immunity lasted longer than vaccine-induced immunity with 80.7% protected at 4–8 months and 44.9% at 15–25 months post-infection. Both second booster vaccines provided temporary protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection; bivalent boosters offered a slight benefit over monovalent boosters. Natural immunity appears to confer longer-lasting protection.
This study aimed to investigate the individual characteristics of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and its association with mental health symptoms among Chinese college students during COVID-19.
Methods
In total, 86,767 students completed the online survey in Guangdong province in June 2021. Data collected including socio-demographic and COVID-19-related information, IU, and mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, insomnia, and suicidal ideation). Latent profile analysis was used to classify IU subgroups. Logistic regression was used to identify IU risk factors.
Results
Four IU subgroups were identified, named low IU (n = 9,197, 10.6%), medium-low IU (n = 25,514, 29.4%), medium-high IU (n = 38,805, 44.7%), and high IU (n = 13,251, 15.3%). Scores of mental health symptoms varied from the degree of IU in the latent profiles. Mental health status was the worst in the high IU group. In addition, females, freshmen, and those perceiving more impacts from COVID-19 and spending longer time surfing COVID-19 information online were at risk of high IU.
Conclusions
Our findings showed that individuals differ in the total degree of intolerance of the uncertainties. Students with high IU were associated with worse mental health symptoms. Thus, taking actions to target individuals with high IU and developing their adaptive coping strategies are imperative during pandemics.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Denmark launched COVIDmeter, a national participatory surveillance platform collecting real-time, self-reported symptoms from a community cohort, aimed to support early signal detection of COVID-like illness. This study describes the community cohort, the reported symptoms among persons testing positive and evaluates COVIDmeter’s performance in detecting trends compared to other established surveillance indicators. A total of 143000 individuals registered as participants, of whom 98% completed at least one weekly questionnaire, resulting in approximately 5.8 million responses over the period from March 2020 to March 2023. Of those who tested positive, the most commonly reported symptoms overall were headache, fatigue, muscle or body aches, cough and fever. Trends in COVID-like illness followed similar patterns to other indicators, with COVID-like illness peaks often preceding increases in incidence and hospital admissions, suggesting early detection potential. The study demonstrated that participatory surveillance can serve as an early detection tool for tracking infection trends, particularly in the early stages of a pandemic. While subject to limitations such as selection bias and self-reporting inaccuracies and participatory symptom surveillance proved to be a rapid, scalable and cost-effective complement to traditional surveillance independent of virus testing, this highlights its relevance for future pandemic preparedness.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact on SARS-CoV-2 transmission prevention of mask wearing by index cases and their household contacts. A prospective study of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to household contacts aged ≥18 years was conducted between May 2022 and February 2024 in Spain. Contacts underwent a rapid antigen test on day zero and a real-time polymerase chain reaction test 7 days later if results were negative. The dependent variable was SARS-CoV-2 infection in contacts. Index case and contact mask use effects were estimated using the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Studied were 230 household contacts, mean (standard deviation) age 53.3 (16.6) years, and 47.8% (110/230) women. Following index case diagnosis, 36.1% of contacts (83/230) used a mask, and 54.3% (125/230) were exposed to a mask-wearing index case. Infection incidence in contacts was 45.2% (104/230) and was lower in contacts exposed to mask-wearing index cases (36.0% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.002). The logistic regression model indicated a protective effect for contacts of both index case mask use (aOR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.15–0.65) and vaccination (aOR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08–0.77). Index case mask use reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission to contacts, while mask effectiveness was not observed for contacts.
The COVID-19 pandemic, which has killed millions of people worldwide, continues to be marked by waves of reinfections. We aimed to assess the incidence and clinical characteristics of reinfection in COVID- 19 cohort.
Material and Methods
A single-center descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected from all patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via PCR from March 18, 2020, the onset of the first major COVID-19 wave, until the end of 2020. All PCR-positive patients were followed-up, and those who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity again at least 90 days after the initial onset were contacted via telemedicine.
Results
5814 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with PCR positive in the first wave were included. The incidence of reinfection among the cohort of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the initial wave of COVID-19 was 0.73%. Among healthcare workers, the 1-year reinfection rate was 2.14%, 3.9 times higher than non-healthcare workers. We observed that the clinical course was milder and less complicated in patients who had reinfection. In cases of reinfection among fully vaccinated individuals, statistically significantly fewer symptoms were observed.
Conclusions
We observed that healthcare workers are at approximately four times greater risk of reinfection. Reinfections generally presented with a milder clinical course.
Determining the factors that impact the risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2 is a priority as the virus continues to infect people worldwide. The objective was to determine the effectiveness of vaccines and other factors associated with infection among Canadian healthcare workers (HCWs) followed from 15 June 2020 to 1 December 2023. We also investigate the association between antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent infections with SARS-CoV-2. Of the 2474 eligible participants, 2133 (86%) were female, 33% were nurses, the median age was 41 years, and 99.3% had received at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine by 31 December 2021. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 was 0.91 per 1000 person-days. Prior to the circulation of the Omicron variants, vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated at 85% (95% CI 1, 98) for participants who received the primary series of vaccine. During the Omicron period, relative adjusted VE was 43% (95% CI 29, 54), 56% (95% CI 42, 67), and 46% (95% CI 24, 62) for 3, 4, and ≥ 5 doses compared with those who received primary series after adjusting for previous infection and other covariates. Exposure to infected household members, coworkers, or friends in the previous 14 days were risk factor for infection, while contact with an infected patient was not statistically significant. Participants with higher levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies had lower rates of infection than those with the lowest levels. COVID-19 vaccines remained effective throughout the follow-up of this cohort of highly vaccinated HCWs. IgG anti-RBD antibody levels may be useful as correlates of protection for issues such as vaccine development and testing. There remains a need to increase the awareness among HCWs about the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 from contacts at a variety of venues.
Pregnant women who contract the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) face an elevated risk of preterm birth, and their newborns are more prone to stillbirth or admission to a neonatal unit. Despite the World Health Organization declaring the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a global health emergency in May 2023, pregnant women continue to contract SARS-CoV-2. Limited information is available on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, understanding the safety of vaccination is crucial. Current evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy does not seem to heighten the risk of miscarriages. Moreover, vaccinations have demonstrated efficacy in safeguarding both pregnant women and their pregnancies
The objectives of this study were to determine how university and surrounding area characteristics are associated with student vaccination rates and vaccine exemption stringency.
Methods
This study collected data from publicly available university-associated and government-associated websites. The university and surrounding area characteristics were evaluated to elucidate how they impact student vaccination rates and ease of exemption from vaccine mandates using statistical correlations and linear regression.
Results
Lower student-to-faculty ratios and stricter university exemption strategies were significantly correlated with higher vaccination rates. Schools that did not allow for personal exemptions to vaccine mandates had significantly higher vaccination rates as compared to schools without vaccine mandates. Certain university and surrounding area characteristics, such as regional location and surrounding area vaccination rates, might serve as underlying factors in inconsistent vaccination rates on university campuses.
Conclusions
Associations were seen between some of the explanatory variables and student vaccination rates. However, more research needs to be conducted to better understand how these discussed factors affect university vaccination rates. This will allow public health professionals to be more prepared as new health concerns arise in the future.
Substate-level analysis reveals geographical variation in COVID-19 epidemiology and facilitates improvement of prevention efforts with greater granularity.
Methods
We analyzed daily confirmed COVID-19 case count in West Virginia and its 9 regions (March 19, 2020-March 9, 2023). Nonparametric bootstrapping and a Poisson-distributed multiplier of 4 were applied to account for irregular and under-reporting. We used the R package EpiEstim to estimate the time-varying reproduction number Rt with 7-day-sliding-windows (2020-2023) and non-overlapping-time-windows between 5 policy changes (2020 only). Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) between each region and West Virginia (2020, 2021, and 2022).
Results
Statewide Rt fluctuated over the study period, with the highest in March 2020 (close to 2) and the lowest Rt (<1) seen in June 2020. The Stay-at-home Order, Face Mask Mandate, and Virtual Learning Resumes saw 38.7% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 21.9%-57.5%), 10.6% (95% CrI, 3.2%-18.9%), and 9.4% (95% CrI, 3.2%-15.4%) corresponding decreases in Rt statewide. All regions experienced incidence rates different from the state. The IRRs ranged from 0.32 (95% CI, 0.32-0.33) (Northern region) to 1.90 (95% CI, 1.87-1.94) (Wood-Jackson region) in 2020.
Conclusions
Policies reducing human contacts, e.g., Stay-at-home Order and Virtual Learning Resumes, effectively reduced transmission statewide.
Sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss has been associated with infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. However, little is known regarding how this differs from sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss of other aetiologies. This systematic review summarises existing literature on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 associated sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss treatment and outcomes.
Methods
A literature search using Ovid was performed for studies which evaluated treatments and outcomes of patients with sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection.
Results
A total of 99 studies were identified, from which 14 studies were selected for inclusion - collectively including 154 patients. Nine of these studies were single participant case reports and five were larger case series. Corticosteroid treatment varied between studies in terms of administration route, dose, and duration. Only 63/154 patients in this review achieved complete resolution of their symptoms following steroid treatment.
Conclusion
Oral, intravenous, and intratympanic steroids demonstrate a good safety profile. However, the majority of patients are left with unresolved hearing loss.
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the context of COVID-19 is not fully understood. We assessed HRQoL using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® measures among 559 former COVID-19 patients and 298 non-infected individuals. HRQoL was captured once up to 2 years after the initial test. Additionally, we described associations of characteristics with impaired HRQoL. Overall, HRQoL scores were inferior among former patients. A meaningful group difference of at least three T-score points was discernible until 12 months after testing for fatigue (3.1), sleep disturbance (3.5), and dyspnoea (3.7). Cognitive function demonstrated such difference even at >18 months post-infection (3.3). Following dichotomization, pronounced differences in impaired HRQoL were observed in physical (19.2% of former patients, 7.3% of non-infected) and cognitive function (37.6% of former patients, 16.5% of non-infected). Domains most commonly affected among former patients were depression (34.9%), fatigue (37.4%), and cognitive function. Factors that associated with HRQoL impairments among former patients included age (OR ≤2.1), lower education (OR ≤5.3), and COVID-19-related hospitalization (OR ≤4.7), among others. These data underline the need for continued attention of the scientific community to further investigate potential long-term health limitations after COVID-19 to ultimately establish adequate screening and management options for those affected.
Within an infrastructure to monitor vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 and COVID-19 related deaths from November 2022 to July 2023 in seven countries in real-world conditions (VEBIS network), we compared two approaches: (a) estimating VE of the first, second or third COVID-19 booster doses administered during the autumn of 2022, and (b) estimating VE of the autumn vaccination dose regardless of the number of prior doses (autumnal booster approach). Retrospective cohorts were constructed using Electronic Health Records at each participating site. Cox regressions with time-changing vaccination status were fit and site-specific estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis. VE estimates with both approaches were mostly similar, particularly shortly after the start of the vaccination campaign, and showed a similar timing of VE waning. However, autumnal booster estimates were more precise and showed a clearer trend, particularly compared to third booster estimates, as calendar time increased after the vaccination campaign and during periods of lower SARS-CoV-2 activity. Moreover, the decrease in protection by increasing calendar time was more clear and precise than when comparing protection by number of doses. Therefore, estimating VE under an autumnal booster framework emerges as a preferred method for future monitoring of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.
Denmark is one of the leading countries in establishing digital solutions in the health sector. When SARS-CoV-2 arrived in February 2020, a real-time surveillance system could be rapidly built on existing infrastructure. This rapid data integration for COVID-19 surveillance enabled a data-driven response. Here we describe (a) the setup of the automated, real-time surveillance and vaccination monitoring system for COVID-19 in Denmark, including primary stakeholders, data sources, and algorithms, (b) outputs for various stakeholders, (c) how outputs were used for action and (d) reflect on challenges and lessons learnt. Outputs were tailored to four main stakeholder groups: four outputs provided direct information to individual citizens, four to complementary systems and researchers, 25 to decision-makers, and 15 informed the public, aiding transparency. Core elements in infrastructure needed for automated surveillance had been in place for more than a decade. The COVID-19 epidemic was a pressure test that allowed us to explore the system’s potential and identify challenges for future pandemic preparedness. The system described here constitutes a model for the future infectious disease surveillance in Denmark. With the current pandemic threat posed by avian influenza viruses, lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic remain topical and relevant.
The purpose of this study was to measure and examine the levels of IgG, IgM, and Spike antibody induced by inactivated vaccines, including CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV.
Methods
Two groups of healthy adults over 18 years old (50 participants per group), who had previously received 1 dose of either BBIBP-CorV or CoronaVac and receiving either a homologous booster of BBIBP-CorV or a heterologous booster of CoronaVac. Serum IgG, IgM, and Spike antibody levels against SARS-COV-2 were measured using magnetic particle chemiluminescence immunoassay and the ELISA method.
Results
The results showed that both spike antibody and IgG/IgM antibodies elicited by a CoronaVac booster following 1 dose of BBIBP-CorV were significantly higher than those elicited by either a homologous BBIBP-CorV booster or a heterologous BBIBP-CorV booster. The Spike antibody against SARS-COV-2 induced by the heterologous CoronaVac booster reached 200.3, which is substantially greater than that induced by the homologous BBIBP-CorV booster (127.5 pg/mL). Conversely, the Spike antibody against SARS-COV-2 induced by the heterologous BBIBP-CorV booster reached 53.93 pg/mL, which is substantially greater than that induced by the homologous CoronaVac booster (9.60 pg/mL).
Conclusions
In summary, CoronaVac is immunogenic as a booster dose following 1 dose of BBIBP-CorV and is immunogenically superior to both the homologous booster and the heterologous BBIBP-CorV booster.