Interventions at frequently used suicide locations that restrict access to means, encourage help-seeking, and increase the likelihood of intervention by a third party are effective in preventing suicide at such sites. However, there have been concerns that such efforts may displace suicides to other sites. It is important to synthesize the evidence on suicide displacement effects.

We conducted a systematic search of Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google for eligible studies from their inception to February 20, 2025. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the pooled effects of interventions on suicides at frequently used locations and other sites, and on overall suicides involving the same method.

Our search identified 17 studies. Meta-analyses showed a reduction in suicides at the intervention sites (pooled incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.04–0.21) and no evidence of changes in suicides at other sites after restricting access to means was deployed alone. The pooled IRR for nearby sites (same type) was 0.99 (95% CI 0.72–1.38); for other sites (same type), it was 0.99 (95% CI 0.76–1.29); and for other sites (different/unspecified type), it was 1.19 (95% CI 0.90–1.58). There was an overall reduction in suicides involving the same method during the post-intervention period (IRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65–0.92). Similar patterns were observed when restricting access to means was assessed alone or with other interventions.

Suicide numbers at other sites did not change after interventions such as restricting access to means were deployed at frequently used locations.

Individuals who die by suicide tend to share more characteristics with those who attempt suicide using violent methods than with those who employ nonviolent means. To date, limited research has been published on the demographic characteristics of individuals who engage in violent suicide attempts.

This study aimed to examine trends in the characteristics of violent suicidal behavior in comparison to nonviolent suicidal behavior.

Patients included in the study were consecutively admitted between 2016 and 2021 to the Dr. Manninger Jenő National Trauma Center and the Psychiatric and Toxicology Wards of Péterfy Sándor Hospital in Budapest, Hungary, for medical treatment following violent or nonviolent suicide attempts. Differences in demographic characteristics, risk factors associated with violent suicidal behavior, and methods of attempt were analyzed using Chi-square tests and logistic regression models.

A total of 298 inpatients (46.1% male, 53.9% female), aged between 18 and 65 – representing the economically active population – were included in the study. The sample comprised 145 individuals who attempted suicide using nonviolent methods (73% female, 27% male) and 153 who used violent methods (64.7% male, 35.3% female). Of the total sample, 22 individuals (12.1%) died during treatment due to severe medical complications. Among male attempters, the highest proportion fell within the economically active age range of 18–55 years, whereas among female attempters, the 18–35 age group represented the highest proportion. The most common violent methods, in descending order of frequency, were stabbing (49.7%), jumping from a height (29.8%), and jumping in front of a train (7.7%). The most frequently diagnosed psychiatric disorders among the sample were major depressive disorder (42.2%), anxiety disorders (44.9%), and bipolar disorder (12%). The leading reported motives for violent suicide attempts, in decreasing order of frequency, were marital conflict (32.4%), divorce/separation/break-up (30.2%), and severe or chronic somatic illnesses (12%). When comparing the two subgroups, the strongest risk factors associated with violent suicide methods included male gender, older age, and residence in the capital city.

Previous studies suggest that risk factors are largely indistinguishable between individuals who engage in violent versus nonviolent suicide attempts. However, individuals who attempted suicide using violent methods exhibited characteristics more closely aligned with those who died by suicide than with the remainder of the sample. The majority of data in this study were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic – a period marked by multiple overlapping crises – which may have played a disproportionately large role in the emergence of suicide risk.

Improving media adherence to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines is crucial for preventing suicidal behaviors in the general population. However, there is currently no valid, rapid, and effective method to evaluate the adherence to these guidelines.

This comparative effectiveness study (January–August 2024) evaluated the ability of two artificial intelligence (AI) models (Claude Opus 3 and GPT-4O) to assess the adherence of media reports to WHO suicide-reporting guidelines. A total of 120 suicide-related articles (40 in English, 40 in Hebrew, and 40 in French) published within the past 5 years were sourced from prominent newspapers. Six trained human raters (two per language) independently evaluated articles based on a WHO guideline-based questionnaire addressing aspects, such as prominence, sensationalism, and prevention. The same articles were also processed using AI models. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman correlations were calculated to assess agreement between human raters and AI models.

Overall adherence to WHO guidelines was ~50% across all languages. Both AI models demonstrated strong agreement with human raters, with GPT-4O showing the highest agreement (ICC = 0.793 [0.702; 0.855]). The combined evaluations of GPT-4O and Claude Opus 3 yielded the highest reliability (ICC = 0.812 [0.731; 0.869]).

AI models can replicate human judgment in evaluating media adherence to WHO guidelines. However, they have limitations and should be used alongside human oversight. These findings may suggest that AI tools have the potential to enhance and promote responsible reporting practices among journalists and, thus, may support suicide prevention efforts globally.

Suicidal ideation and behaviours are common among adolescents, posing significant challenges. Parents have a protective role in mitigating this risk, yet they often feel ill-equipped to support their adolescents, and their specific support needs are not well understood.

To explore the lived experiences of parents with suicidal adolescents and identify their support needs in the context of a therapist-assisted online parenting programme.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three stakeholder groups based in Australia: nine parents with lived experience caring for a suicidal adolescent, five young people who experienced suicidality during adolescence and five clinical/research experts in youth mental health/suicide prevention. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret findings.

Three key themes highlight the experience of parenting a suicidal adolescent: the traumatising emotional experience, uncertainty and parent empowerment. Six themes described parents’ support needs: validation and support, practical and tailored strategies, rebuilding the parent–adolescent relationship, parental self-care, flexible and accessible modes of delivery, and understanding non-suicidal self-injury.

Findings highlight key themes of parenting a suicidal adolescent and parental support needs. An online parenting programme could offer parents flexible access to evidence-based parenting strategies. Yet, a purely digital approach may not address the complexities of the parent-adolescent dynamic and provide adequate tailoring. As such, a hybrid approach incorporating therapist support can provide parents with both the compassionate support and practical guidance they seek.

This article describes an innovative program to provide safe, evidence-based psychiatric care at the Baltimore Convention Center Field Hospital (BCCFH), set up for COVID-19 patients, to alleviate overextended hospitals.

This article describes the staffing and workflows utilized at the BCCFH including universal suicide risk assessment and co-management of high acuity patients by an NP-led psychiatry service.

The Columbia-Suicide Screening Rating Scale (C-SSRS) proved feasible as a suicide screening tool. Using the SAFE-T protocol, interdisciplinary teams cared for moderate and low risk patients. The NP psychiatry service evaluated over 70 patients, effecting medication changes in more than half and identified and transferred several decompensating patients for higher-level psychiatric care. Group therapy attendees demonstrated high participation. There were no assaults, self-harm incidents, or suicides.

The BCCFH psychiatry/mental health program, a potential model for other field hospitals, promotes evidence-based, integrated care. Emphasizing safety, including suicide risk, is crucial within alternate care sites during disasters. The engagement of dually-certified (psychiatric and medical) nurse practitioners boosts safety and provides expertise with advanced medication management and psychotherapeutic interventions. Similar future sites should be ready to handle chronically ill psychiatric patients, detect high-risk or deteriorating ones, and develop therapeutic programs for patient stabilization and support.

Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.

Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.

High-risk (n = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- (n = 2149) and low-risk (n = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.

Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.

While past research suggested that living arrangements are associated with suicide death, no study has examined the impact of sustained living arrangements and the change in living arrangements. Also, previous survival analysis studies only reported a single hazard ratio (HR), whereas the actual HR may change over time. We aimed to address these limitations using causal inference approaches.

Multi-point data from a general Japanese population sample were used. Participants reported their living arrangements twice within a 5-year time interval. After that, suicide death, non-suicide death and all-cause mortality were evaluated over 14 years. We used inverse probability weighted pooled logistic regression and cumulative incidence curve, evaluating the association of time-varying living arrangements with suicide death. We also studied non-suicide death and all-cause mortality to contextualize the association. Missing data for covariates were handled using random forest imputation.

A total of 86,749 participants were analysed, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 51.7 (7.90) at baseline. Of these, 306 died by suicide during the 14-year follow-up. Persistently living alone was associated with an increased risk of suicide death (risk difference [RD]: 1.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3–2.5%; risk ratio [RR]: 4.00, 95% CI: 1.83–7.41), non-suicide death (RD: 7.8%, 95% CI: 5.2–10.5%; RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.38–1.74) and all-cause mortality (RD: 8.7%, 95% CI: 6.2–11.3%; RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.42–1.79) at the end of the follow-up. The cumulative incidence curve showed that these associations were consistent throughout the follow-up. Across all types of mortality, the increased risk was smaller for those who started to live with someone and those who transitioned to living alone. The results remained robust in sensitivity analyses.

Individuals who persistently live alone have an increased risk of suicide death as well as non-suicide death and all-cause mortality, whereas this impact is weaker for those who change their living arrangements.