No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2026
The tripartite relationship model is unlikely to reflect how relationships are represented in the mind, given considerable difficulty in wresting clear conceptual distinctions from it. Instead, it offers a descriptive framework for organizing findings. Here, we present examples of conceptual difficulties of the model and elaborate on the functional importance of third-party inference based on our agent-based modeling work.
Target article
Cognitive representations of social relationships and their developmental origins
Related commentaries (30)
Attachment bonds: a foundation for understanding social relationships
Babies can be good at relationships and other things too: arguments for moral cognition in infancy
Beyond the dyad: how do cognitive representations of social networks develop?
Cognitive representations of social relationships: Innate structures or cultural shaping?
Computational models of social cognition should incorporate social relationships as core primitives
Computing relational strength: an implausible component of early naïve sociology
Do infants recognize relationships indirectly?
Early developmental origins of social knowledge
Early sociomoral reasoning encompasses more than interpersonal relationships
From pairs to patterns: combinatorial processes and relational reasoning in the processing of social relations
How to explain the strength of the bond? The normative missing link
How to get from here to a relational social psychology
Infant representations of social relationships: the need to consider the social world
Intuitive sociology or intuitive social psychology?
Moral somatic marker: new directions for the mechanisms underlying morality in preverbal infants
Overcoming the shortcomings of the computer metaphor of the infant mind by embodying social relations
Perceptual-cue-based mechanisms for recognizing social agents and their roles in social interactions
Relational core cognition is for understanding the meaning of social life, not just enduring interpersonal relationships
Relational models are too elaborate for basic social relationship reasoning
Relationships do not depend on prior knowledge, instead knowledge develops within relationships
Representations are constructed: where are the questions about the dynamics of the first interactions and the security of the attachment bond?
Representations of equality or partiality? Unequal distributions as cues to social relationships
Shift to a new paradigm: realizing the relational models
Social connection and mental state reasoning
Social groups include social relationships
The evolution and development of infant social relationship reasoning: a Tinbergenian analysis
The evolution of core social knowledge
Toward a unified theory of social relationships and social networks
Two modes of equality matching: positive and negative direct reciprocity
What are the conceptual primitives of relationships? An agent-based modeling approach
Author response
Cognitive primitives, learning, and the structure of early social relationship cognition