Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-cp4x8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T07:45:57.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Grammar

from Part VI - Language Skills and Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2025

By
S. Susan Marandi
Edited by
Glenn Stockwell  and
Yijen Wang
Glenn Stockwell
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Yijen Wang
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Get access

Summary

After briefly touching upon the relevance of online communication to language learning and the learning of grammar in today’s world, the chapter opens with an introduction to the theoretical and historical background of grammar teaching. It then moves on to introduce some of the more popular and accessible forms of technology-based grammar instruction, elucidating how each one ties in with grammar teaching principles and pedagogical practices. Following this, relevant research practices are introduced, followed by recommendations for research and practice. The chapter ends with predictions for the future of technology-enhanced grammar teaching and learning.

Keywords

corrective feedback (CF)interactive feedbackfocus on form vs. focus on forms (FonF vs. FonFs)data-driven learning (DDL)concordancingcollaborative online writinginput hypothesisoutput hypothesisuptakegrammar
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning , pp. 494 - 510
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Abrams, Zs. I. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10125/44681Google Scholar
Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401700012XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (Ed.). (2009). Corpora and language teaching. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44447Google Scholar
Bodnar, S., Cucchiarini, C., de Vries, B. P., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2017). Learner affect in computerised L2 oral grammar practice with corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1302964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P. (2017). Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: Feedback and error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30(4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346–251X(02)00047-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gains, J. (1999). Electronic mail: A new style of communication or just a new medium? An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889–4906(97)00051-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, J., & Ma, S. (2019). The effect of two forms of computer-automated metalinguistic corrective feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10125/44683Google Scholar
Gimenez, J. C. (2000). Business e-mail communication: Some emerging tendencies in register. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889–4906(98)00030-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Han, S., & Shin, J.-A. (2017). Teaching Google search techniques in an L2 academic writing context. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 172–194. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2017/hanshin.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hedjazi Moghari, M., & Marandi, S. (2017). Triumph through texting: Restoring learners’ interest in grammar. ReCALL, 29(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–15. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learningGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H.-C., & Lo, Y.-F. (2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10125/44659Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data‐driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1–16. https://moodle.ils.uw.edu.pl/pluginfile.php/10011/mod_resource/content/2/Tim%20Johns%20and%20DDL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., & Waller, D. (2015). Corpus linguistics for grammar: A guide for research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kılıçkaya, F. (2019). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1668811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lan, Y.-J., Kan, Y.-H., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2016). Oral-performance language tasks for CSL beginners in Second Life. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 60–79. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2016/lanetal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2017). Using corpora to develop learners’ collocational competence. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 153–171.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259–278). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marandi, S. S. (2017). Virtual walls and bans: E-learning/CALL hegemonies in the Iranian context. In Colpaert, J., Aerts, A., Kern, R., & Kaiser, M. (Eds.), CALL in Context: Proceedings of the XVIIIth International CALL Conference, UC Berkeley, California (pp. 488–495). University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Marandi, S. S. (2023). Virtual supremacy and electronic imperialism: the hegemonies of e-learning and Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Learning, Media and Technology, 49(4), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2207832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, S., & Oh, S. (2018). Unlearning overgenerated be through data-driven learning in the secondary EFL classroom. ReCALL, 30(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peachey, N. (2023). ChatGPT in the language classroom. Peachey Publications.Google Scholar
Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W. et al. (2023). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(9), 828–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puentedura, R. R. (2006, November 28). Transformation, technology, and education in the state of Maine [Web log post]. www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2006_11.htmlGoogle Scholar
Puentedura, R. R. (2013, May 29). SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation [Web log post]. www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reppen, R. (2010). Using corpora in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C.-W. (2019). The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 72, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026765839100700204Google Scholar
Shemesh, H. (2023, January 24). The ultimate guide for using ChatGPT for English learning. The Accent’s Way, 289. https://hadarshemesh.com/magazine/chatgpt-for-learning-englishGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (2004). How to use corpora in language teaching. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S., & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, S.-C. (2020). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Ablex.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wach, A., Zhang, D., & Nichols-Besel, K. (2021). Grammar instruction through multinational telecollaboration for pre-service teachers. ReCALL, 34(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y.-F. (2018). New language knowledge construction through indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1414852CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

In this book chapter, Heift and Vyatkina explore four technology-based pedagogies for teaching and learning grammar: tutorial CALL, ICALL, DDL, and CMC. The authors provide an overview of the historical framework and offer practical guidelines for integrating technology into L2 grammar classrooms. The chapter presents a comprehensive examination of technology’s role in L2 grammar teaching and learning, providing educators with valuable insights and strategies to enhance their classroom practices.

This article explores the effectiveness of online individualized corrective feedback in improving grammatical error correction skills among EFL learners. It highlights the potential of personalized feedback in facilitating language learning and emphasizes the importance of integrating technology into language education for effective feedback delivery.

Heift, T., & Vyatkina, N. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 grammar. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 26–44). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, C.-J. (2022). Online individualized corrective feedback on EFL learners’ grammatical error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2118783CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Grammar
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.036
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Grammar
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.036
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Grammar
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.036
Available formats
×