Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T06:02:22.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Program Management

from Part II - Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

By
Peerasit Patanakul  and
Jeffrey K. Pinto
Edited by
Shankar Sankaran ,
Ralf Müller  and
Nathalie Drouin
Shankar Sankaran
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Ralf Müller
Affiliation:
BI Norwegian Business School
Nathalie Drouin
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Project Management , pp. 106 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bueno, J. C. (2010). Who’s afraid of political risks? Retrieved from http://kluwerconstructionblog.com/2010/08/12/whos-afraid-of-political-risks/.Google Scholar
Chaos, (2014). The Standish Group.Google Scholar
Chaos Report, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16(4), 579–604, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600406.Google Scholar
Davies, A. & Mackenzie, I. (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games, International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 773–790, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.004.Google Scholar
Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) (2011). Tasmanian government project management guidelines. Retrieved from www.egovernment.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/147511/Tasmanian_Government_Project_Management_Guidelines_V7_0_July_2011_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). From Nobel prize to project management: Getting risks right. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 5–15.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Over budget, over time, over and over again: Managing major projects. In Morris, P., Pinto, J., & Soderlund, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Project Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321–344.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2016). The fallacy of beneficial ignorance: A test of Hirschman’s Hiding Hand. World Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards (GAPPS), retrieved from: http://globalpmstandards.org/tools/complexity-rating/program-typology/.Google Scholar
Gray, R. J. (1997). Alternative approaches to programme management. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 5–9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00014-2.Google Scholar
Hexter, J. & Mischke, J. (2013). Fixing the world’s infrastructure problems. Harvard Business Review, Apr 11, retrieved from: www.hbr.org/2013/04/fixing-the-worlds-infrastructu#prclt-82stesn8.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1967). The Principle of the Hiding Hand. The Public Interest, Winter, 10–23.Google Scholar
International Project Management Association (IPMA) (2006). ICB – IPMA Competence Baseline, Version 3.0, Nijkerk, The Netherlands: International Project Management Association.Google Scholar
International Project Management Association (IPMA) (2013). IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline, Nijkerk, The Netherlands: International Project Management Association.Google Scholar
Jones, L. R. & Euske, K. J. (1991). Strategic misrepresentation in budgeting. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 1(4), 437–460.Google Scholar
Lycett, M., Rassau, A., & Danson, J. (2004). Programme management: A critical review. International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 289–299, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinsuo, M. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 794–803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.013.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, A. v., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Veenswijk, M. (2008). Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), 591–600, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milosevic, D.Z., Martinelli, R.J., Wadell, J.M. (2007). Program Management for Improved Business Results. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Morris, P. W. G. (2013). Reconstructing Project Management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2003). Managing Successful Programmes. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Patanakul, P. (2013). Key drivers of effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 4–17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2199993.Google Scholar
Patanakul, P., Kwak, Y. H., Zwikael, O., & Liu, M. (2016). What impact the performance of large-scale government projects? International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 452–466, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.001.Google Scholar
Pellegrinelli, S. (2011). What’s in a name: Project or programme? International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 232–240, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.009.Google Scholar
Pellegrinelli, S., Partington, D., Hemingway, C., Mohdzain, Z., & Shah, M. (2007). The importance of context in programme management: An empirical review of programme practices. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 41–55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.002.Google Scholar
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2008). The Standard for Program Management, 2nd Ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.Google Scholar
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2013). The Standard for Program Management. 3rd Ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.Google Scholar
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2016). The High Cost of Low Performance: Pulse of the Profession. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.Google Scholar
Santiago, F. (2012). Why is benefits management so hard to do? Project Times, June 5, Retrieved from: www.projecttimes.com/articles/why-is-benefits-management-so-hard-to-do.html.Google Scholar
Teller, J., Unger, B. N., Kock, A., & Gemunden, H. G. (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 596–607, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.020.Google Scholar
Thiry, M. (2002). Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 221–227, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00072-2.Google Scholar
Thiry, M. (2004). ‘For DAD’: A programme management life-cycle process. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 245–252, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00064-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. & Conboy, K. (2013). Contemporary project portfolio management: Reflections on the development of an Australian competency standard for project portfolio management, International Journal of Project Management, 31(8), 1089–1100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.005.Google Scholar
Zwikael, O., Pathak, R. D., Singh, G., Ahmed, S. (2014). The moderating effect of risk on the relationship between planning and success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 435–441, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.002.Google Scholar
Zwikael, O. & Smyrk, J. R. (2011). Project Management for the Creation of Organizational Value. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×