Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-gcwzt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T17:59:24.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Virtual Reality

from Part III - Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2025

By
Kristi Jauregi Ondarra ,
Sabela Melchor-Couto  and
Silvia Canto
Edited by
Glenn Stockwell  and
Yijen Wang
Glenn Stockwell
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Yijen Wang
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Get access

Summary

Virtual reality (VR) is considered one of the most promising emerging technologies for learning. Its incorporation in education offers teachers and students endless opportunities to enjoy embodied experiences that would otherwise be inaccessible in a classroom setting (e.g. visiting Mount Everest or experiencing the cellular defense system from inside your body). The increasing popularity of VR has stimulated educators’ and researchers’ interest to explore its learning potential in education. In the present chapter we explore the historical development of VR, we discuss the pedagogical theories underpinning its use, describe its potential for language education, analyze empirical research, and make suggestions for future research.

Keywords

virtual worldsvirtual realityvirtual exchange
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning , pp. 213 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow.Google Scholar
Alfadil, M. M. (2017). VR game classroom implementation: Teacher perspectives and student learning outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Northern Colorado. http://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations.Google Scholar
Awada, G., & Diab, H. B. (2018). The effect of Google Earth and wiki models on oral presentation skills of university EFL learners. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(1), 36–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1169829.pdfGoogle Scholar
Berns, A., & Reyes-Sánchez, S. (2021). A review of virtual reality-based language learning apps. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, A., González-Pardo, A., & Camacho, D. (2011). Implementing the use of virtual worlds in the teaching of foreign languages (Level A1). In Czepielewski, S. (2011) (Ed.), Learning a language in virtual worlds: A review of innovation and ICT in language teaching methodology (pp. 33–40). Warsaw Academy of Computer Science.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (2008). From language education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (2012). Conceptualizing intercultural (communicative) competence and intercultural citizenship. In Jackson, J. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 85–98). Routledge.Google Scholar
Canto, S., & Jauregi Ondarra, K. (2017). Language learning effects through the integration of synchronous socializing network opportunities in language curricula: The case of video communication and Second Life. Language Learning in Higher Education Journal, 7(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2017-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canto, S., de Graaff, R., & Jauregi, K. (2014). Telecollaborative tasks for negotiation of intercultural meaning in virtual worlds and video-web-communication. In González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 183–212). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. (2016). EFL learners’ strategy use during task-based interaction in Second Life. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2306Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Smith, T. S., York, C. S., & Mayall, H. J. (2020). Google Earth Virtual Reality and expository writing for young English learners from a Funds of Knowledge perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, P. (1997). Health and safety issues associated with virtual reality: A review of current literature. Advisory Group on Computer Graphics (AGOGG) Technical Reports. www.agocg.ac.uk/reports/virtual/37/37.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.), The handbook of research for educational communications and technology 4th ed. (pp. 723–734). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgunsöz, E., Yildirim, G., & Yildirim, S. (2018). The effect of virtual reality on EFL writing performance. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 278–292. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/1329Google Scholar
Dourda, K., Bratitsis, T., Griva, E., & Papadopoulou, P. (2014). Content and language integrated learning through an online game in primary school: A case study. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 12(3), 243–258. www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=285Google Scholar
Ebadi, S., & Ebadijalal, M. (2020). The effect of Google Expeditions virtual reality on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1975–2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1854311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2012). Investigating the performance of tasks. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Language teaching research and language pedagogy (pp. 195–235). Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. The International Scientific Conference: eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Gruber, A., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2020). User experience of public speaking practice in virtual reality. In Zheng, R. Z. (Ed.), Cognitive and affective perspectives on immersive technology in education (pp. 235–249). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3250-8.ch012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, M., Huang, H., Grant, S., & Henderson, L. (2009). Language acquisition in Second Life: Improving self-efficacy beliefs. In Atkinson, R. J., & McBeath, C. (Eds.), Same places, different spaces. Proceedings Ascilite Auckland (pp. 464–474). University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Herrera, B. (2020). Realidad virtual inmersiva en Facebook Spaces: Análisis del grado de interacción oral y copresencia en un curso online de español como lengua extranjera. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/64682Google Scholar
Hsu, L. (2015). EFL learners implicit theory of intelligence and the application of MMORPG in EFL Learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 52, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2015040104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Roscoe, R. D., Johnson‐Glenberg, M. C., & Craig, S. D. (2021). Motivation, engagement, and performance across multiple virtual reality sessions and levels of immersion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, A., & Moonen, M. (2011). Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 24, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi Ondarra, K., Gruber, A., & Canto, S. (2020). When international avatars meet: Intercultural language learning in virtual reality exchange. In Frederiksen, K. M., Larsen, S., Bradley, L., & Thouësny, S. (Eds.), CALL for widening participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020 (pp. 138–142). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi Ondarra, K., Canto, S., & Melchor-Couto, S. (2022). Virtual worlds and second language acquisition. In Ziegler, N., & González-Lloret, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and technology (pp. 311–326). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351117586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi Ondarra, K., Gruber, A., & Canto, S. (2021). Pedagogical experiences in a virtual exchange project using high-immersion virtual reality for intercultural language learning. In Zoghlami, N., Brudermann, C., Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., Bradley, L., & Thouësny, S. (Eds.), CALL and professionalisation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 155–160). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 2012, 21(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development Vol. 1. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2019). Virtual memory palaces: Immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, M. (2015). Willingness to communicate in English in active worlds. In Turula, A., & Chojnacka, M. (Eds.), CALL for bridges between school and academia (pp. 129–142). Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar
Lai, K.-W. K., & Chen, H. J. H. (2021). A comparative study on the effects of a VR and PC visual novel game on vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 312–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1928226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Y. J. (2014). Does Second Life improve Mandarin learning by overseas Chinese students? Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 36–56. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44365Google Scholar
Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16–31. www.lltjournal.org/item/2898Google Scholar
Lan, Y.-J., Kan, Y.-H., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2016). Oral-performance language tasks for CSL beginners in Second Life. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 60–79. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44482Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legault, J., Zhao, J., Chi, Y.-A., Chen, W., Klippel, A., & Li, P. (2019). Immersive virtual reality as an effective tool for second language vocabulary learning. Languages, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. J., & Lan, Y. L. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: Past, present, and future. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486–497. www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.486Google Scholar
Liou, H. C. (2012). The roles of Second Life in a college computer-assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.597766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Dede, C. Huang, R., & Richards, J. (Eds.) (2017). Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (Smart Computing and Intelligence). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_2Google Scholar
Lloyd, A., Rogerson, S., & Stead, G. (2017). Imagining the potential for using virtual reality technologies in language learning. In Carrier, M., Damerow, R. M., & Bailey, K. M. (Eds.), Digital language learning and teaching: Research, theory, and practice (1st ed., pp. 222–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Madini, A. A., & Alshaikhi, D. (2017). VR for teaching ESP vocabulary: A myth or a possibility. International Journal of English Language Education, 5(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v5i2.11993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martirosov, S., Bureš, M., & Zítka, T. (2021). Cyber sickness in low-immersive, semi-immersive, and fully immersive virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 19, 1–18. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1007/s10055-021-00507-4Google Scholar
Melchor-Couto, S. (2017). Foreign language anxiety levels in Second Life oral interaction. ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchor-Couto, S. (2018). Virtual world anonymity and foreign language oral interaction. ReCALL, 30(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchor-Couto, S., & Herrera, B. (2023). Immersive virtual reality: Exploring possibilities for virtual exchange. In Potolia, A., & Derivry-Plard, M. (Eds.), Virtual exchange for intercultural language learning and teaching: Fostering communication for the digital age (pp. 92–114). Routledge.Google Scholar
Parmaxi, A. (2020). Virtual reality in language learning: A systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. (2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL, 24(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M., Wang, Q., & Mirzaei, M. S. (2019). The use of network-based virtual worlds in second language education: A research review. In Kruk, M. (Ed.), Assessing the effectiveness of virtual technologies in foreign and second language instruction (pp. 1–25). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7286-2.ch001Google Scholar
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risager, K. (2012). Linguaculture. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3418–3421). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0709Google Scholar
Rogers, S. (2019). Virtual reality: The learning aid of the 21st century. Forbes.Google Scholar
Rupp, M. A., Kozachuk, J., Michaelis, J. R., Odette, K. L., Smither, J. A., & McConnell, D. S. (2016). The effects of immersiveness and future VR expectations on subjective experiences during an educational 360° video. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60(1), 2101–2105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601477Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (1999). Immersion vs. interactivity: Virtual reality and literary theory. SubStance, 28(2), 110–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivner, O., Madewell, J., Buckley, C., & Perez, N. (2019). Best practices in the use of augmented and virtual reality technologies for SLA: Design, implementation, and feedback. In Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (Ed.), Teaching language and teaching literature in virtual environments (pp. 55–72). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1358-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Y. C. (2015). A virtual walk through London: Culture learning through a cultural immersion experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.851703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, M., Spanlang, B., & Corominas, D. (2010). Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 29(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, T. Y., Chen, H. H.-J., & Todd, G. (2020). The impact of a virtual reality app on adolescent EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 892–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1752735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In Van den Branden, K. (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 1–17). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wang, F., Burton, J. K., & Falls, J. (2012). A three-step model for designing initial Second Life-based foreign language learning activities. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 324–333.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Lan, Y. L., Tseng, W. T., Lin, Y.T R., & Gupta, C. L. (2019). On the effects of 3D virtual worlds in language learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 891–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1598444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehner, A. K., Gump, A. W., & Downey, S. (2011). The effects of Second Life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y., Chen, Y., & Ryder, L. H. (2019). Effects of using mobile-based virtual reality on Chinese L2 students’ oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1604551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, K. (2018). Computer-assisted learning of communication (CALC): A case study of Japanese learning in a 3D virtual world. ReCALL, 30(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, K. (2019). The effective use of a 3D virtual world in a JFL classroom: Evidence from discourse analysis. In Zimmerman, E., & McMeekin, A. (Eds.), Technology supported learning in and out of the Japanese language classroom: Pedagogical, theoretical, and empirical developments (pp. 227–251). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Yang, F. C. O., Lo, F. Y. R., Hsieh, J. C., & Wu, W. C. V. (2020). Facilitating communicative ability of EFL learners via high-immersion virtual reality. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 30–49. www.jstor.org/stable/26915405Google Scholar
York, J., Shibata, K., Tokutake, H., & Nakayama, H. (2020). Effect of SCMC on foreign language anxiety and learning experience: A comparison of voice, video, and VR-based oral interaction. ReCALL, 33, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Bowman, D. A., & Jones, C. N. (2019). Exploring effects of interactivity on learning with interactive storytelling in immersive virtual reality. 2019 11th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-Games.2019.8864531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Brewer, R. A., & Wagner, M. (2010). Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.205-231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

In this article, Blyth explores immersive technologies as tools for foreign language education, with a specific focus on augmented reality (AR) and VR. The discussion ranges from historical perspectives to future challenges, shedding light on the potential of these technologies.

This book chapter offers a comprehensive overview of VWs as a technology-mediated approach to facilitate SLA. It provides insights into research studies and practical applications by exploring the potential benefits of VWs in promoting language proficiency, cultural understanding, and communicative competence.

This book chapter explores the best practices for incorporating AR and VR technologies in the context of SLA. The authors discuss topics such as the design, implementation, and feedback mechanisms related to these technologies.

Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi Ondarra, K., Canto, S., & Melchor-Couto, S. (2022). Virtual worlds and second language acquisition. In Ziegler, N., & González-Lloret, M. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and technology (pp. 311–326). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351117586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivner, O., Madewell, J., Buckley, C., & Perez, N. (2019). Best practices in the use of augmented and virtual reality technologies for SLA: Design, implementation, and feedback. In Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (Ed.), Teaching language and teaching literature in virtual environments (pp. 55–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1358-5_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×