Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:15:03.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Building Deep Specialization through Intentional Learning Activities

from Part III - Designing the Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, P. A. 2003. Development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher 32: 1014.Google Scholar
Ansburg, P. I., and Dominowski, R. L. 2000. Promoting insightful problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior 34: 30–60.Google Scholar
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., and Seibert, D. 2004. Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 344370.Google Scholar
Barneff, S., and Koslowski, B. 2002. Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 237267.Google Scholar
Barzilai, S., and Blau, I. 2014. Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers and Education 70: 6579.Google Scholar
Bell, B. S., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2002. A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management 27(1): 14–49.Google Scholar
Bersin, J. 2009. Deep specialization for competitive advantage. http://www.astd.org/Publications/Newsletters/LX-Briefing/LXB-Archives/2009/11/Deep-Specialization-for-Competetive-Advantage (accessed November 27, 2009).Google Scholar
Bongers, P. J., Diederick van Hove, P., Stasssen, P. S., Dankelman, J., and Schreuder, H. 2015. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: Can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Surgical Education 72: 184191.Google Scholar
Borton, G. 2007. Measuring the business impact of employee proficiency and employee job life cycle. Management Services (Autumn): 28–33.Google Scholar
Bowling, S. R., Khasawneh, M. T., Kaewkuekool, S., Jiang, X. C., and Gramopadhye, A. K. 2008. Evaluating the effects of virtual training in an aircraft maintenance task. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 18: 104116.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. P. 1999. What’s real about virtual reality? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19(6): 16–27.Google Scholar
Burton, A. M., Shadbolt, N. R., Rugg, G., and Hedgecock, A. P. 1990. The efficacy of knowledge elicitation techniques: A comparison across domains and levels of expertise. Knowledge Acquisition 22: 167178.Google Scholar
Byham, W. C. 2008. Strong Start to Job Success. White paper. Development Dimensions International, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Caligiuri, P., and Tarique, I. 2014. Individual-level accelerators of global leadership development. In Osland, J. S., Li, M, and Wang, Y, eds., Advances in Global Leadership, 8: 251267.Google Scholar
Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., and van Merriënboer, J. J. 2014. How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review 12: 1429.Google Scholar
Cerasoli, C. P., Alliger, G. M., Donsbach, J. S., Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S., and Orvis, K. A. 2014. What is informal learning and what are its antecedents? An integrative and meta-analytic review. Research Note 2014-03. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Belvoir, VA.Google Scholar
Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction 8: 293332.Google Scholar
Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E., and Vasyukova, E. 2005. The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19: 151165.Google Scholar
Chatham, R. E. (2009). The 20th century revolution in military training. Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments. In K. A. Ericsson, ed., Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments, 27–60. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cockayne, W., and Darken, R. 2004. The application of human ability requirements to virtual environment interface design and evaluation. In D. Diaper and N. Stanton, eds., The Handbook of Task Analysis of Human Computer Interaction, 401–421. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Dall’Alba, G., and Sandberg, J. 2006. Unveiling professional development: A critical view of stage models. Review of Educational Research 76: 383412.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Flanders, J. L., and Peterson, J. B. 2008. Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20: 278290.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. 2006. Intuitive, deliberative, and calculative models of expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., and Hoffman, R. R., eds., Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 1728. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., and Dreyfus, S. E. 1986. Mind over Machine. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., and Dreyfus, S. E. 2005. Peripheral vision expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies 26: 779792.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., and Davidi, I. 2005. After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5): 857–871.Google Scholar
Ely, K., Zaccaro, S. J., and Conjar, E. A. 2009. Leadership development: Training design strategies for growing adaptability in leaders. In C. Cooper and R. Burke, eds., The Peak Performing Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ericsson, E. 1996. The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. 2004. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine 79: S70S81.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. 2006. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., and Hoffman, R. R., eds., Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 683706. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., and Charness, N. 1994. Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist 49: 725.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., and Tesch-Römer, C. 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100: 363406.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., and Roring, R. W. 2009. Toward a science of exceptional achievement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1172: 199217.Google Scholar
Fadde, P. J., and Klein, G. A. 2010. Deliberate performance: Accelerating expertise in natural settings. Performance Improvement 49: 514.Google Scholar
Farrington-Darby, T., and Wilson, J. R. 2006. The nature of expertise: A review. Applied Ergonomics 37: 1732.Google Scholar
Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., and Fiore, S. 2012. Differential impact of two types of metacognitive prompting provided during simulation-based training. Computers in Human Behavior 28: 696702.Google Scholar
Ford, J. K., and Kraiger, K. 1995. The application of cognitive constructs to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T., eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 148. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ford, J. K., and Meyer, T. 2014. Advances in training technology: Meeting the workplace challenges of talent development, deep specialization and collaborative learning. In M. D. Coovert and L. F. Thompson, eds., The Psychology of Workplace Technology, 43–76. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ford, J. K., and Schmidt, A. M. 2000. Emergency response training: Strategies for enhancing real-world performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials 75: 195215.Google Scholar
Ford, J. K., Quiñones, M. A., Sego, D. J. and Sorra, J. S. 1992. Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology 45: 511527.Google Scholar
Germain, M. L., and Tejeda, M. J. 2012. A preliminary exploration on the measurement of expertise: An initial development of a psychometric scale. Human Resource Development Quarterly 23: 203232.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Glaser, R., and Chi, M. T. H. 1988. Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R., Glaser, and M. J. Farr, eds., The Nature of Expertise, XV–XXVIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. K., Anand, D. K., Brough, J. E., Schwartz, M., and Kavetsky, R. A. 2008. Training in Virtual Environments. College Park, MD: Calce Press.Google Scholar
Hague, S., and Srinivasan, S. 2006. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 10: 5158.Google Scholar
Hatano, G., and Inagaki, K. 1986. Two courses of expertise. In Stevenson, H., Azuma, J., and Hakuta, K., eds., Child Development and Education in Japan, 262272. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R. 1996. How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., and Fleck, J., eds., Exploring Expertise, 81100. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., ed., 2007. Expertise Out of Context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., and Hanes, L. F. 2003. The boiled frog problem. IEEE: Intelligent Systems (July–August): 6871.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., Ford, K. M., and Novak, J. D. 2006. A method for eliciting, preserving, and sharing the knowledge of forecasters. Weather and Forecasting 21: 416428.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., and Klein, G. 1995. Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62: 129158.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Ward, P., Feltovich, P. J., DiBello, L., Fiore, S. M., and Andrews, D. H. 2014. Accelerated Expertise. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. 1991. Symbolic connectionism: Toward third generation theories of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. and Smith, J., eds., Towards a General Theory of Expertise, 301335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, S. D., Wickens, C. D., Carolan, T. F., and Cumming, J. M. 2013. The influence of cognitive load on transfer with error prevention training methods: A meta-analysis. Human Factors 55: 864874.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Risk Management of Knowledge Loss in Nuclear Industry Organizations. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R., Kafry, D., and Zedeck, S. 1980. Expectations of behaviorally anchored rating scales. Personnel Psychology 33: 595640.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S. 2007. Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review 19: 509539.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 2003. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38: 2331.Google Scholar
Kanar, A. M., and Bell, B. S. 2013. Guiding learners through technology-based instruction: The effects of adaptive guidance design and individual differences on learning over time. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4): 10671081.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., and Ployhart, R. E. 2014. The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during, and after the Great Recession. Journal of Applied Psychology 99: 361389.Google Scholar
Kinchin, I. M., and Cabot, L. B. 2010. Reconsidering the dimensions of expertise: From linear stages towards dual processing. London Review of Education 8: 153166.Google Scholar
Kinicki, A. J., Bannister, B. D., Hom, P. W., and DeNisi, A. S. 1985. Behaviorally anchored rating scales vs. summated rating scales: Psychometric properties and susceptibility to rating bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement 45: 535549.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., and van Merriёnboer, J. J. G. 2008. Ten steps to complex learning: A new approach to instruction and instructional design. In Good, T. L., ed., 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, 244253. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41: 7586.Google Scholar
Klein, G. 1997. Developing expertise in decision making. Thinking and Reasoning 3: 337352.Google Scholar
Klein, G. 2004. The Power of Intuition. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Klein, G. A., and Hoffman, R. R. 1993. Seeing the invisible: The perceptual cognitive aspect of expertise. In Rabinowitz, M., ed., Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction, 203226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., and Klahr, D. 2008. Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science 342: 935937.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K., and Ford, J. K. 2007. The expanding role of workplace training: Themes and trends influencing training research and practice. In Koppes, L. L, ed., Historical Perspectives in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 281309. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lajoie, S. P. 2003. Transitions and trajectories for studies of expertise. Educational Researcher 32: 2125.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. R., Oestergaard, J., Ottesen, B. S., and Soerensen, J. L. 2012. The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: A systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 91: 10151028.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. R., Soerensen, J. L., Grantcharov, T. P., Dalsgaard, T., Schouenborg, L., Ottosen, C., Schroeder, T. V., and Ottesen, B. S. 2009. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: Randomized controlled trial. BMJ 338: b1802.Google Scholar
Lord, R.G. and Hall, R.J. 2005. Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skills. The Leadership Quarterly 16: 591615.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist 59(1): 1419.Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. 2004. Leadership development through experience. The Academy of Management Executive 18: 127130.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. D., and Brutus, S. 1998. Management Development Through Job Experiences. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., and Morrow, J. E. 1994. Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 544560.Google Scholar
McGaghie, W. D., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E., Barsuk, J. H., and Wayne, D. B. 2012. Does simulation based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academy Medical 86: 706711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J., Woolf, N., van Winkelen, C., and Morgan, C. 2009. Cognition in strategic decision making. A model of non-conventional thinking capacities for complex situations. Cognition in Strategic Decision Making 27: 209232.Google Scholar
Moon, B., Hoffman, R., and Ziebell, D. 2009. How did you do that? Utilities develop strategies for preserving and sharing expertise. Electric Perspectives 34 (January–February): 2029.Google Scholar
Najjar, M. 2008. On scaffolding adaptive teaching prompts within virtual labs. International Journals of Distance Education Technologies 6(2): 3554.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. K., Zaccaro, S. J., and Herman, J. L. 2010. Strategic information provision and experiential variety as tools for developing adaptive leadership skills. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 62: 131142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S. 1992. Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane and K. J. Gilhooly, eds., Advances in the Psychology of Thinking, 1–44. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Oransanu, J., and Connolly, T. 1993. The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Oransanu, R. Calderwood, and C. E. Zsambok, eds., Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, 3–20. Norwood, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Prietula, M. J., and Simon, H. A. 1989. The experts in your midst. Harvard Business Review 67: 120124.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., and Baxter, G. P. 2000. Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In Schraw, G. and Impara, J. C., eds., Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, 4397. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., and Plamondon, K. E. 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 612624.Google Scholar
Quinn, R. E., and Cameron, K. S. 1988. Paradox and transformation: A framework for viewing organization and management. In R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron, eds., Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., and Teachout, M. S. 1995. The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology 48: 887910.Google Scholar
Salas, E., and Rosen, M. A. 2009. Experts at work: Principles for developing expertise in organizations. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 99134. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Schaefer, P. S., Shadrick, S. B., Beaubien, J., and Crabb, B. T. 2008. Training effectiveness assessment of Red Cape: Crisis action planning of execution (Research Report 1885). Arlington, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. 1993. Career Anchors, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shadrick, S. B., and Lussier, J. W. 2004. Assessment of the “think like a commander” training program. Research Report 1824. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Shadrick, S. B., and Lussier, J. W. 2009. Training complex cognitive skills: A theme-based approach to the development of battlefield skills. In Ericson, K. A., ed., Development of Professional Expertise, 286311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shadrick, S. B., Lussier, J. W., and Fultz, C. 2007. Accelerating the development of adaptive performance: Validating the Think Like a Commander training (ARI Research Report 1868). Arlington, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Shea, J. B., and Morgan, R. L. 1979. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 179187.Google Scholar
Smith, E., Ford, J. K., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 1997. Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In Quiñones, M. and Ehrenstein, A., eds., Training for the 21st Century: Applications of Psychological Research, 89118. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S. 1995. Excellent software professionals: Experience, work activities, and perceptions by peers. Behaviour and Information Technology 14: 289299.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S. 1998. Expertise in professional software design: A process study. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 703715.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S. 2000. Expertise at work: Experience and excellent performance. In Cooper, C. and Robertson, I., eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 15: 223264. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S., and Kleine, B. 2000. Deliberate performance at work: A study with insurance agents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73: 87102.Google Scholar
Sung, S. Y., and Choi, J. N. 2014. Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35: 393412.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., and Cerasoli, C. P. 2013. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors 55: 231245.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, M., and Salas, 2010. Informal learning and development in organizations. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 303–332. New York: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. J., Russ-Eft, D. F., and Chan, D. W. 2005. A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 692–709.Google Scholar
Tesluk, P. E., and Jacobs, R. R. 1998. Toward an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology 51: 321355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, K., and de Beer, M. M. 2007. Playing a winning game: An implementation of critical thinking training. In R. R. Hoffman, ed., Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalist Decision Making, 177–198. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. 2000. The development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. High Ability Studies 11: 939.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. and Verhelst, N. D. 2002. The psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 18: 165178.Google Scholar
Van der Maas, H. L. J., and Wagenmakers, E. 2005. A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. American Journal of Psychology 118: 2960.Google Scholar
van Merriёnboer, J. J., and Kirshchner, P. A. 2007. Ten Steps to Complex Learning. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., and Kester, L. 2003. Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, D. J., and Shanteau, J. 2003. Empirical assessment of expertise. Human Factors 45: 104116.Google Scholar
Wulf, G., and Shea, C. H. 2002. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 185211.Google Scholar
Young, J. Q., van Merriёnboer, J., Durning, S., and Cate, O. T. 2014. Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE guide no. 86. Medical Teacher 36: 371384.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Banks, D., Kiechel-Koles, L., Kemp, C., and Bader, P. 2009. Leader and team adaptation: The influences and development of key attributes and processes. Tech. Rep. No. #1256. U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Ziebell, D. 2008. Program on Technology Innovation: Accelerating the Achievement of Mission-Critical Expertise: A Research Roadmap. Report 1016710. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J., Sestokas, J. M., Burns, C. A., Bell, J., and Manning, D. 2012. Methods and tools for training crisis response. Research Note 2012-07. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Zwick, T. 2006. The impact of training intensity on establishment productivity. Industrial Relations 45: 2646.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×