Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:27:25.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Facilitating the Development of Expertise

An Individual to Organizational Perspective

from Part I - Fundamental Issues in Learning and Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

By
Alena D. Marand  and
Raymond A. Noe
Edited by
Kenneth G. Brown
Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Training and Employee Development , pp. 38 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. 2008. Building micro foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics 29: 489–502.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., and Kraiger, K. 2009. Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 451–474.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G., and Morris Lampert, C. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal 22: 521–543.Google Scholar
Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., and Volberda, H. W. 2010. Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies 47: 1343–1364.Google Scholar
Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P. J. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14: 33–46.Google Scholar
Argote, L., ed. 2013. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Argote, L., and Ingram, P. 2000. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 150–169.Google Scholar
Argote, L., and Miron-Spektor, E. 2011. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science 22: 1123–1137.Google Scholar
Argyris, C., and Schon, D. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Reading, MA: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W. Jr., Edens, P. S., and Bell, S. T. 2003. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 234–245.Google Scholar
Augier, M., and Teece, D. J. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science 20: 410–421.Google Scholar
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1992. Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: A resource based analysis. Advances in Strategic Management 8: 39–61.Google Scholar
Barney, J., and Felin, T. 2013. What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives 27: 138–155.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. N., and Erdogan, B. 2014. Delineating and reviewing the role of newcomer capital in organizational socialization. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 439–457.Google Scholar
Bear, D. J., Tompson, H. B., Morrison, C. L., Vickers, M., Paradise, A., Czarnowsky, M., Soyars, M., and King, K. 2008. Tapping the Potential of Informal Learning: An ASTD Research Study. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar
Becker, M. C. 2004. Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 643–678.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. 1993. Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., and Huang, J. L. 2010. Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management 36: 1065–1105.Google Scholar
Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., and Zenger, T. R. 2012. Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal 33: 587–610.Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. M., and Stuart, H. W. 1996. Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5: 5–24.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., and Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47: 795–817.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12: 198–213.Google Scholar
Brown, K. G., and Sitzmann, T. 2011. Training and employee development for improved performance. In Zedeck, S., ed., APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 469–503. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Buchholtz, A. K., Ribbens, B. A., and Houle, I. T. 2003. The role of human capital in postacquisition CEO departure. Academy of Management Journal 46: 506–514.Google Scholar
Burns, T. E., and Stalker, G. M. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Champaign, IL: Academy for Entrepreneurial LeadershipGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., Eriksen, B., Håkonsson, D. D., and Snow, C. C. 2006. Organization Design: The Evolving State-of-the-Art. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Cabrera, A., and Cabrera, E. F. 2002. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies 23: 687–710.Google Scholar
Cabrera, E. F., and Cabrera, A. 2005. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16: 720–735.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., and Kryscynski, D. 2012. Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review 37: 376–395.Google Scholar
Choi, W., and Jacobs, R. L. 2011. Influences of formal learning, personal learning orientation, and supportive learning environment on informal learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly 22: 239–257.Google Scholar
Coff, R., and Kryscynski, D. 2011. Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital–based competitive advantages. Journal of Management 37: 1429–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S. 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 653–698.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coletti, A. L., Sedatole, K. L., and Towry, K. L. 2005. The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review 80: 477–500.Google Scholar
Colombo, M. G., and Grilli, L. 2005. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy 34: 795–816.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., and Noe, R. A. 2000. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 678–707.Google Scholar
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., and Trougakos, J. P. 2012. Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 33: 64–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creed, W. D., and Miles, R. E. 1996. Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity cost of controls. In Tyler, T. R. and Kramer, R. M., eds., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 16–38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., and White, R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24: 522–537.Google Scholar
Csaszar, F. A. 2013. An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organization Science 24: 1083–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. N. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 50: 352–364.Google Scholar
Damodaran, L., and Olphert, W. 2000. Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behaviour and Information Technology 19: 405–413.Google Scholar
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M. and Bingham, C. B. 2009. Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly 54: 413–52.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., and Myers, C. G. 2012. Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5: 258–279.Google Scholar
Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35: 1504–1511.Google Scholar
Doornbos, A. J., Simons, R. J., and Denessen, E. 2008. Relations between characteristics of workplace practices and types of informal work-related learning: A survey study among Dutch Police. Human Resource Development Quarterly 19: 129–151.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. 2000. Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities 1: 24.Google Scholar
Ducan, R. B., and Weiss, A. 1979. Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In Staw, B., ed., Research in Organizational Behavior, 1: 75–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 350–383.Google Scholar
Edmonson, A. C. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science 13: 128–146.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32: 543–576.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–1121.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., and Bingham, C. B. 2010. CROSSROADS-microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science 21: 1263–1273.Google Scholar
Ellinger, A. D. 2005. Contextual factors influencing informal learning in a workplace setting: The case of reinventing itself company. Human Resource Development Quarterly 16: 389–415.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., and Dweck, C. S., eds. 2013. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., and Tesch-Römer, C. 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100: 363–406.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., and Hoffman, R. R., eds. 2006. Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 1976. A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 1981. The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review 6: 309–319.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 2012. The impact of socializing. In Wanberg, C., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Socialization, 215–229. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C., and O’Neill, O. A. 2014. The role of socialization, orientation, and training programs in transmitting culture and climate and enhancing performance. In Schneider, B. and Barbera, K. M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture, 44–64. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science 11: 611–629.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. 2003. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change 12: 727–752.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., and Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 94–118.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., and Madsen, T. L. 2012. Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies 49: 1351–1374.Google Scholar
Fiol, C. M., and Lyles, M. A. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review 10: 803–813.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., and Lane, P. J. 2000. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review 25: 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2003. Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: An evaluation and a stocktaking. Industrial and Corporate Change 12: 185–201.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Knudsen, C., eds. 2013. Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garicano, L., and Wu, Y. 2012. Knowledge, communication, and organizational capabilities. Organization Science 23: 1382–1397.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B., and Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47: 209–226.Google Scholar
Gittell, J. H. and Weiss, L. 2004. Coordination networks within and across organizations: A multi-level framework. Journal of Management Studies 41: 127–153.Google Scholar
Good, D., and Michel, E. J. 2013. Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of Psychology 147: 435–453.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 1991. A resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review (Spring): 114–135.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 109–122.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., and Puranam, P. 2009. Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science 20: 422–440.Google Scholar
Gully, S., and Chen, G. 2010. Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcome. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 3–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., and Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49: 693–706.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T., Podolny, J. M., and Pfeffer, J. 2001. So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 18: 21–57.Google Scholar
Hatch, N. W., and Dyer, J. H. 2004. Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 25: 1155–1178.Google Scholar
Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal 15: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herling, R. W. 2000. Operational definitions of expertise and competence. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2: 8–21.Google Scholar
Herling, R. W., and Provo, J. 2000. Knowledge, competence, and expertise in organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2: 1–7.Google Scholar
Hinds, P. J., Patterson, M., and Pfeffer, J. 2001. Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 1232–1243.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., and Healey, M. P. 2011. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 32: 1500–1516.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., and Klein, G. 1995. Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Rational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62: 129–158.Google Scholar
Hoopes, D. G., and Madsen, T. L. 2008. A capability-based view of competitive heterogeneity. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: 393–426.Google Scholar
Hoopes, D. G., and Postrel, S. 1999. Shared knowledge, glitches, and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal 29: 837–865.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2: 88–115.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. G. J., and Ropo, A. 1995. Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. The Leadership Quarterly 6: 379–412.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. 2003. Structured On-the-job Training: Unleashing Employee Expertise in the Workplace. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. L. 1997. The taxonomy of employee development: Toward an organizational culture of expertise. In Torraco, R. J., ed., AHRD Conference Proceedings, 278–283. Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resources Development.Google Scholar
Jaffee, D. 2001. Organization Theory: Tension and Change. New York: McGraw-Hill: 1–315.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., and Volberda, H. W. 2008. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies 45: 982–1007.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1998. The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. 1990. Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. and Hough, L., eds., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1: 75–130. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Kim, D. H. 1993. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review 35: 35–50.Google Scholar
Kim, D. H. 1998. The link between individual and organizational learning. In D. A. Klein, ed., The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital, 41–62. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heineman.Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Mathieu, J. E., Cordery, J. L., Rosen, B., and Kukenberger, M. 2011. Managing a new collaborative entity in business organizations: Understanding organizational communities of practice effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 96: 1234.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3: 383–397.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7: 502–518.Google Scholar
Kor, Y. Y., and Leblebici, H. 2005. How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms’ financial performance? Strategic Management Journal 26: 967–985.Google Scholar
Kostopoulos, K. C., and Bozionelos, N. 2011. Team exploratory and exploitative learning: psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group and Organization Management 36: 385–415.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, K. G., Weissbein, D. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Salas, E. 2000. A multilevel approach to training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In Klein, K. J. and Kozlowski, S. W. J., eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, 157–210. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., and Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. and Kozlowski, S. W. J., eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, 3–90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., and Nijs, H. 2009. Learning conditions for non-formal and informal workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 21: 369–383.Google Scholar
Lado, A. A., and Wilson, M. C. 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review 19: 699–727.Google Scholar
Langfred, C. W. 2004. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal 47: 385–399.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13: 111–125.Google Scholar
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., and Taylor, M. S. 2007. Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review 32: 180–194.Google Scholar
Levitt, B., and March, J. G. 1988. Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.Google Scholar
Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., and Graham, I. D. 2009. Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science 4: 11.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. S., and Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Uncertainty imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics 13: 418–438.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A., and Rumelt, R. P. 2003. The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal 24: 903–927.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71–87.Google Scholar
Martin, H. J. 2010. Improving training impact through effective follow-up: Techniques and their application. Journal of Management Development 29: 520–534.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., and Chen, G. 2010. The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management 37: 610–641.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., and Tesluk, P. E. 2010. A multilevel perspective on training and development effectiveness. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 405–442. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maurer, I., Bartsch, V., and Ebers, M. 2011. The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies 32: 157–185.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., and Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science 14: 91–103.Google Scholar
Miller, , D., and Shamsie, J. 1996. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal 39: 519–543.Google Scholar
Miller, L. 2012. State of the Industry, 2012. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar
Miner, A. S., and Haunschild, P. R. 1995. Population-level learning. In Cummings, L. and Staw, B. M., eds., Research in Organizational Behavior 17, 115–166.Google Scholar
Mom, T. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., and Volberda, H. W. 2009. Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science 20: 812–828.Google Scholar
Murase, T., Doty, D., Wax, A. M. Y., DeChurch, L. A., and Contractor, N. S. 2012. Teams are changing: Time to think networks. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5(1): 41–44.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23: 242–266.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. A., and Zenger, T. R. 2002. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organization Science 13: 547–566.Google Scholar
Noe, R. A. 2013. Employee Training and Development, 6th ed. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D., and Klein, H. J. 2014. Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 245–275.Google Scholar
Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., and Marand, A. D. 2013. Individual differences and informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 83: 327–335.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5: 14–37.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., and Von Krogh, G. 2009. Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science 20: 635–652.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., and Tushman, M. L. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review (April): 74–83.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., and Tushman, M. L. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185–206.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., and Tushman, M. L. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives 27: 324–338.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. 1992. A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. New York: Springer US.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, A., and Mitchell, W. 2009. Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: The impact of within-firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strategic Management Journal 30: 1065–1091.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., and Rueter, H. H. 1994. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 484–510.Google Scholar
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14: 179–191.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., and Moliterno, T. P. 2011. Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review 36: 127–150.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., and Baughman, K. 2006. The structure and function of human capital emergence: A multilevel examination of the attraction-selection-attrition model. Academy of Management Journal 49: 661–677.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., and Borman, W. C. 2003. Hiring for knowledge-based competition. In Jackson, S. E., DeNisi, A., and Hitt, M. A., eds., Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management, 155–161. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., and Plamondon, K. E. 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 612–624.Google Scholar
Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., Sego, D. J., and Smith, E. M. 1995. The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks. Training Research Journal 1: 29–49.Google Scholar
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., and Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20: 685–695.Google Scholar
Reed, R., and DeFillippi, R. J. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 15: 88–102.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J. W., and Siggelkow, N. 2003. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Science 49: 290–311.Google Scholar
Rogan, M., and Mors, M. L. 2014. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science 25: 1860–1877.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior 7: 1–37.Google Scholar
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., and Smith-Jentsch, K. A. 2012. The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13: 74–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, M. A., and Phelps, C. C. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53: 1113–1126.Google Scholar
Sears, J., and Hoetker, G. 2014. Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal 35: 48–67.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N. 2001. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal 44: 838–857.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D. A. 2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 14: 650–669.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D. A. 2005. Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: Linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search. Strategic Organization 3: 85–115.Google Scholar
Simon, H. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 125–134.Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., and Weinhardt, J. M. 2015. Training engagement theory: A multilevel perspective on the effectiveness of work-related training. Journal of Management, in press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., and Clark, K. D. 2005. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal 48: 346–357.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., and Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science 16: 522–536.Google Scholar
Stalk, G., Evans, P., and Shulman, L. E. 1992. Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review (March–April): 57–69.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, M., and Youndt, M. A. 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48: 450–463.Google Scholar
Sung, S. Y., and Choi, J. N. 2012. Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 118: 4–13.Google Scholar
Swanson, R. A. 1994. Analysis for Improving Performance: Tools for Diagnosing Organizations and Documenting Workplace Expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 27–43.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., and Yukl, G. 1992. Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 399–441.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., McNall, L. A., and Salas, E. 2010. Informal learning and development in organizations. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 303–332. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., and Cohen, D. 2012. Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5: 2–24.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 39–63.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–1350.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.Google Scholar
Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I., and Kavanagh, M. J. 1995. Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacy, M., and Wiersema, F. 1993. Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review (January–February): 84–93.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J., and Schein, E. 1979. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior 1: 209–264.Google Scholar
Volberda, H. W., and Lewin, A. Y. 2003. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies 40: 2111–2136.Google Scholar
Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., and Nonaka, I. 2000. Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, S., and Noe, R. A. 2010. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review 20: 115–131.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.Google Scholar
Winter, S. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In Teece, D. J., ed., The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, 159–184. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. 1995. Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. In Montgomery, C. A., ed., Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm, 147–178. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24: 991–995.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27: 185–203.Google Scholar
Zander, U., and Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science 6: 76–92.Google Scholar
Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13: 339–351.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×